大型环境项目的多属性决策与公众风险认知

J. Harvey, P. Norman, S. Joyce
{"title":"大型环境项目的多属性决策与公众风险认知","authors":"J. Harvey, P. Norman, S. Joyce","doi":"10.1080/14664530490896609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment of societal risk perception is a different process compared to traditional risk assessment based on probabilistic risk evaluation methods. Where uncertainty and subjectivity exist, a structured decision making method that can capture public risk perception would help designers to progress toward sustainable product design. In this article a multiple attribute decision making methodology is tested using two groups of experts to assess possible public perceptions of gasification plants. Issues associated with the methodology are discussed.","PeriodicalId":212131,"journal":{"name":"Risk Decision and Policy","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-attribute decision making and public perceptions of risk in relation to large scale environmental projects\",\"authors\":\"J. Harvey, P. Norman, S. Joyce\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14664530490896609\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assessment of societal risk perception is a different process compared to traditional risk assessment based on probabilistic risk evaluation methods. Where uncertainty and subjectivity exist, a structured decision making method that can capture public risk perception would help designers to progress toward sustainable product design. In this article a multiple attribute decision making methodology is tested using two groups of experts to assess possible public perceptions of gasification plants. Issues associated with the methodology are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Decision and Policy\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Decision and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14664530490896609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Decision and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14664530490896609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

社会风险感知评估是一个不同于传统的基于概率风险评估方法的风险评估过程。在不确定性和主观性存在的情况下,一种能够捕捉公众风险感知的结构化决策方法将有助于设计师朝着可持续产品设计的方向发展。在这篇文章中,一个多属性的决策方法进行了测试,使用两组专家评估可能的公众对气化厂的看法。讨论了与方法相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-attribute decision making and public perceptions of risk in relation to large scale environmental projects
Assessment of societal risk perception is a different process compared to traditional risk assessment based on probabilistic risk evaluation methods. Where uncertainty and subjectivity exist, a structured decision making method that can capture public risk perception would help designers to progress toward sustainable product design. In this article a multiple attribute decision making methodology is tested using two groups of experts to assess possible public perceptions of gasification plants. Issues associated with the methodology are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信