{"title":"Set和Set操作","authors":"Tim Pilachowski","doi":"10.1201/9781315273761-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subsets and predicates. For these notes we'll look at one set U , called the universal set, and its subsets. In later notes, we'll build new sets out of old ones using the product construction and the powerset construction. The universal set U corresponds to the domain of discourse in predicate logic when we're only considering unary predicates on that domain. Let, for instance, U be the set of integers, usually denoted Z. A couple of unary predicates for this domain are S(x): \\x is a perfect square,\" and P (x): \\x is a positive integer.\" These two predicates correspond to two subsets of U . The rst corresponds to the set of perfect squares which includes 0; 1; 4; 9; etc., and the second corresponds to the set of positive integers which includes 1; 2; 3; etc. The subset that corresponds to a unary predicate is called the extent of the predicate. There's such a close correspondence between a unary predicate and it's extent that we might as well use the same symbol for both. So, we can use S for the subset of perfect squares, or S for the predicate which indicates with the notation S(x) whether an integer x is a perfect square or not. There are a couple of ways to use notation to specify a set. One is by listing its elements, at least the rst few, and hoping the reader can understand your intent.","PeriodicalId":348406,"journal":{"name":"Introductory Concepts for Abstract Mathematics","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sets and Set Operations\",\"authors\":\"Tim Pilachowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1201/9781315273761-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Subsets and predicates. For these notes we'll look at one set U , called the universal set, and its subsets. In later notes, we'll build new sets out of old ones using the product construction and the powerset construction. The universal set U corresponds to the domain of discourse in predicate logic when we're only considering unary predicates on that domain. Let, for instance, U be the set of integers, usually denoted Z. A couple of unary predicates for this domain are S(x): \\\\x is a perfect square,\\\" and P (x): \\\\x is a positive integer.\\\" These two predicates correspond to two subsets of U . The rst corresponds to the set of perfect squares which includes 0; 1; 4; 9; etc., and the second corresponds to the set of positive integers which includes 1; 2; 3; etc. The subset that corresponds to a unary predicate is called the extent of the predicate. There's such a close correspondence between a unary predicate and it's extent that we might as well use the same symbol for both. So, we can use S for the subset of perfect squares, or S for the predicate which indicates with the notation S(x) whether an integer x is a perfect square or not. There are a couple of ways to use notation to specify a set. One is by listing its elements, at least the rst few, and hoping the reader can understand your intent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Introductory Concepts for Abstract Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Introductory Concepts for Abstract Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315273761-15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Introductory Concepts for Abstract Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315273761-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Subsets and predicates. For these notes we'll look at one set U , called the universal set, and its subsets. In later notes, we'll build new sets out of old ones using the product construction and the powerset construction. The universal set U corresponds to the domain of discourse in predicate logic when we're only considering unary predicates on that domain. Let, for instance, U be the set of integers, usually denoted Z. A couple of unary predicates for this domain are S(x): \x is a perfect square," and P (x): \x is a positive integer." These two predicates correspond to two subsets of U . The rst corresponds to the set of perfect squares which includes 0; 1; 4; 9; etc., and the second corresponds to the set of positive integers which includes 1; 2; 3; etc. The subset that corresponds to a unary predicate is called the extent of the predicate. There's such a close correspondence between a unary predicate and it's extent that we might as well use the same symbol for both. So, we can use S for the subset of perfect squares, or S for the predicate which indicates with the notation S(x) whether an integer x is a perfect square or not. There are a couple of ways to use notation to specify a set. One is by listing its elements, at least the rst few, and hoping the reader can understand your intent.