Irina Dincă
{"title":"Configurarea Paradigmei Terţului Inclus – Blaga, Bachelard, Lupaşcu1","authors":"Irina Dincă","doi":"10.2478/clb-2019-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper aims to present the connection and continuity between the implicit principles that configure the transgressive visions of Lucian Blaga, Gaston Bachelard and Ștefan Lupașcu, which inaugurate a paradigmatic change in consensus with the revolutionary ideas circulating in science, philosophy, poetry and art across the 20th century. The subtle paradigmatic axis which crosses implicitly or explicitly the work of Lucian Blaga proves to be the transgressive attempt of integration and overcoming of the antinomies under the sign of the included middle which underlies the transfiguring core of the dogmatic paradox. Thus, the nucleus of Blaga’s epistemological vision, the dogmatic paradox – a synthesis of the antinomies solved not in concrete level, but in transcendent one, creating a paradoxical logics – proves to be close to Gaston Bachelard’s transgressive theoretical constructions – the surrationalism and the philosophy of no –, as well as to Ştefan Lupaşcu’s integrative perspective of the dynamic logics of the contradictory. The subtly related nexus of theoretical ideas developed by Blaga, Bachelard and Lupașcu appear to be essential milestones in the avant-garde of the paradigmatic chain of the included middle, opening it towards the present European episteme.","PeriodicalId":398624,"journal":{"name":"Lucian Blaga Yearbook","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lucian Blaga Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/clb-2019-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文旨在揭示卢西恩·布拉加、加斯顿·巴舍拉和Ștefan Lupașcu等人的越界观点的隐含原则之间的联系和连续性,这些隐含原则开创了一种范式变化,与整个20世纪在科学、哲学、诗歌和艺术领域传播的革命性思想一致。卢西恩·布拉加的作品中含蓄或明确地贯穿着微妙的范式轴线,这被证明是在包含中间的标志下整合和克服矛盾的越界尝试,这是教条式悖论的变形核心的基础。因此,布拉加认识论视野的核心——教条悖论——不是在具体层面,而是在超越层面解决的二律背反的综合,创造了一种悖论逻辑——被证明接近加斯东·巴舍拉的越界理论结构——超现实主义和不的哲学,以及Ştefan lupa对矛盾的动态逻辑的综合视角。由Blaga, Bachelard和Lupașcu发展的理论思想的微妙关联似乎是包括中间的范式链的先锋派的重要里程碑,将其打开到当前的欧洲知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Configurarea Paradigmei Terţului Inclus – Blaga, Bachelard, Lupaşcu1
Abstract This paper aims to present the connection and continuity between the implicit principles that configure the transgressive visions of Lucian Blaga, Gaston Bachelard and Ștefan Lupașcu, which inaugurate a paradigmatic change in consensus with the revolutionary ideas circulating in science, philosophy, poetry and art across the 20th century. The subtle paradigmatic axis which crosses implicitly or explicitly the work of Lucian Blaga proves to be the transgressive attempt of integration and overcoming of the antinomies under the sign of the included middle which underlies the transfiguring core of the dogmatic paradox. Thus, the nucleus of Blaga’s epistemological vision, the dogmatic paradox – a synthesis of the antinomies solved not in concrete level, but in transcendent one, creating a paradoxical logics – proves to be close to Gaston Bachelard’s transgressive theoretical constructions – the surrationalism and the philosophy of no –, as well as to Ştefan Lupaşcu’s integrative perspective of the dynamic logics of the contradictory. The subtly related nexus of theoretical ideas developed by Blaga, Bachelard and Lupașcu appear to be essential milestones in the avant-garde of the paradigmatic chain of the included middle, opening it towards the present European episteme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信