从法律解释的角度重新审视班加罗尔水案中对“工业”的解释

A. Bhatnagar
{"title":"从法律解释的角度重新审视班加罗尔水案中对“工业”的解释","authors":"A. Bhatnagar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1681528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bangalore Water case (1978) expanded the scope of ‘industry’ considerably which was not in tune with the post-1960 trend, that by and large tried to confine the scope of ‘industry’ Justice Krishna Iyer who delivered the majority judgment seemed to be influenced by a lot of factors while determining the confines of ‘industry’. The researcher tries to analyze the interpretational approach adopted by Justice Krishna Iyer in the Bangalore Water case to resolve the issue as to what activities can be ‘industry’. The researcher also attempts to discuss as to how judges substitute their own intentions in the garb of interpreting the intention of the legislature. The researcher opines that the act of interpretation of ‘industry’ as has been done by Justice Krishna Iyer in the case of Bangalore Water supply, is nothing but an act of judicial legislation which is unacceptable.","PeriodicalId":245985,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Institutions in Markets (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting Interpretation of 'Industry' as has Been Done in Bangalore Water Case from an Interpretation of Statute Perspective\",\"authors\":\"A. Bhatnagar\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1681528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Bangalore Water case (1978) expanded the scope of ‘industry’ considerably which was not in tune with the post-1960 trend, that by and large tried to confine the scope of ‘industry’ Justice Krishna Iyer who delivered the majority judgment seemed to be influenced by a lot of factors while determining the confines of ‘industry’. The researcher tries to analyze the interpretational approach adopted by Justice Krishna Iyer in the Bangalore Water case to resolve the issue as to what activities can be ‘industry’. The researcher also attempts to discuss as to how judges substitute their own intentions in the garb of interpreting the intention of the legislature. The researcher opines that the act of interpretation of ‘industry’ as has been done by Justice Krishna Iyer in the case of Bangalore Water supply, is nothing but an act of judicial legislation which is unacceptable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Institutions in Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Institutions in Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1681528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Institutions in Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1681528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

班加罗尔水案(1978年)大大扩大了“工业”的范围,这与1960年后的趋势不一致,总的来说,试图限制“工业”的范围。法官Krishna Iyer在决定“工业”的范围时,做出了多数判决,似乎受到了许多因素的影响。研究人员试图分析法官Krishna Iyer在班加罗尔水案中采用的解释方法,以解决什么活动可以成为“工业”的问题。本文还试图探讨法官如何在解释立法机关意图的外衣下替代自己的意图。研究人员认为,法官Krishna Iyer在班加罗尔供水案中对“工业”的解释只不过是一种不可接受的司法立法行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting Interpretation of 'Industry' as has Been Done in Bangalore Water Case from an Interpretation of Statute Perspective
The Bangalore Water case (1978) expanded the scope of ‘industry’ considerably which was not in tune with the post-1960 trend, that by and large tried to confine the scope of ‘industry’ Justice Krishna Iyer who delivered the majority judgment seemed to be influenced by a lot of factors while determining the confines of ‘industry’. The researcher tries to analyze the interpretational approach adopted by Justice Krishna Iyer in the Bangalore Water case to resolve the issue as to what activities can be ‘industry’. The researcher also attempts to discuss as to how judges substitute their own intentions in the garb of interpreting the intention of the legislature. The researcher opines that the act of interpretation of ‘industry’ as has been done by Justice Krishna Iyer in the case of Bangalore Water supply, is nothing but an act of judicial legislation which is unacceptable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信