想象的结构

R. Evan
{"title":"想象的结构","authors":"R. Evan","doi":"10.5117/9789463722100_CH04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rejecting any binary thinking that would have reading novels as an act\n of imagination while films are received through perception, this chapter\n examines how adaptations are experienced through the embodied imagination.\n This chapter builds upon approaches to imagination in cognitive\n aesthetics to argue that imagination is grounded in perception. This\n chapter draws on two case studies, Wonder (Stephen Chbosky, 2017) and\n Mood Indigo (Michel Gondry, 2013), both criticized for making tangible\n their literary sources in a manner than nullifies imaginative engagement.\n Rather, I argue that spectators feel their way into the worlds and\n existential feelings of their characters through the embodied imagination.\n This chapter suggests that perception can lead to a greater imaginative\n understanding of a work, the world, and others, and how such an imaginative\n connection might shift our point of view. That is, screen adaptations\n are equipped to enact a leap from sight to insight.","PeriodicalId":253689,"journal":{"name":"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Textures of Imagination\",\"authors\":\"R. Evan\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/9789463722100_CH04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rejecting any binary thinking that would have reading novels as an act\\n of imagination while films are received through perception, this chapter\\n examines how adaptations are experienced through the embodied imagination.\\n This chapter builds upon approaches to imagination in cognitive\\n aesthetics to argue that imagination is grounded in perception. This\\n chapter draws on two case studies, Wonder (Stephen Chbosky, 2017) and\\n Mood Indigo (Michel Gondry, 2013), both criticized for making tangible\\n their literary sources in a manner than nullifies imaginative engagement.\\n Rather, I argue that spectators feel their way into the worlds and\\n existential feelings of their characters through the embodied imagination.\\n This chapter suggests that perception can lead to a greater imaginative\\n understanding of a work, the world, and others, and how such an imaginative\\n connection might shift our point of view. That is, screen adaptations\\n are equipped to enact a leap from sight to insight.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722100_CH04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722100_CH04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拒绝任何将阅读小说作为一种想象行为而通过感知接受电影的二元思维,本章研究了如何通过具体化的想象来体验改编。本章建立在认知美学中想象的方法上,认为想象是基于感知的。本章借鉴了两个案例研究,《Wonder》(Stephen Chbosky, 2017)和《Mood Indigo》(Michel Gondry, 2013),这两个案例都被批评为以一种使想象参与无效的方式使其文学来源具体化。更确切地说,我认为观众是通过具体化的想象来感受他们的世界和角色的存在感。这一章表明,感知可以让我们对作品、世界和他人有更丰富的想象力,以及这种想象力的联系如何改变我们的观点。也就是说,银幕改编是为了实现从视觉到洞察力的飞跃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Textures of Imagination
Rejecting any binary thinking that would have reading novels as an act of imagination while films are received through perception, this chapter examines how adaptations are experienced through the embodied imagination. This chapter builds upon approaches to imagination in cognitive aesthetics to argue that imagination is grounded in perception. This chapter draws on two case studies, Wonder (Stephen Chbosky, 2017) and Mood Indigo (Michel Gondry, 2013), both criticized for making tangible their literary sources in a manner than nullifies imaginative engagement. Rather, I argue that spectators feel their way into the worlds and existential feelings of their characters through the embodied imagination. This chapter suggests that perception can lead to a greater imaginative understanding of a work, the world, and others, and how such an imaginative connection might shift our point of view. That is, screen adaptations are equipped to enact a leap from sight to insight.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信