反驳格雷戈里·克拉克的沙文主义发展理论

PSN: Europe & Eurasia (Development) (Topic) Pub Date : 2015-03-19 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2580751

Hak Choi

{"title":"反驳格雷戈里·克拉克的沙文主义发展理论","authors":"Hak Choi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2580751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper refutes Gregory Clark’s chauvinist view that European countries are superior to the Asian ones, because they have been so. This paper proves that Clark’s empirical result is merely a movement along an isoquant with no implication on productivity. Then, this paper works out a similar relation to show that Asian countries can also be superior to the European ones, by the same Clark standard.","PeriodicalId":413603,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Europe & Eurasia (Development) (Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refuting Gregory Clark's Chauvinist Development Theory\",\"authors\":\"Hak Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2580751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper refutes Gregory Clark’s chauvinist view that European countries are superior to the Asian ones, because they have been so. This paper proves that Clark’s empirical result is merely a movement along an isoquant with no implication on productivity. Then, this paper works out a similar relation to show that Asian countries can also be superior to the European ones, by the same Clark standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Europe & Eurasia (Development) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Europe & Eurasia (Development) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Europe & Eurasia (Development) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文驳斥了格雷戈里·克拉克的沙文主义观点，即欧洲国家比亚洲国家优越，因为它们一直如此。本文证明，克拉克的实证结果只是沿着等量线的运动，对生产率没有任何影响。然后，本文推导出一个类似的关系，表明在同样的克拉克标准下，亚洲国家也可以优于欧洲国家。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Refuting Gregory Clark's Chauvinist Development Theory

This paper refutes Gregory Clark’s chauvinist view that European countries are superior to the Asian ones, because they have been so. This paper proves that Clark’s empirical result is merely a movement along an isoquant with no implication on productivity. Then, this paper works out a similar relation to show that Asian countries can also be superior to the European ones, by the same Clark standard.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PSN: Europe & Eurasia (Development) (Topic)

自引率

0.00%

发文量