神经网络规则提取的比较研究

Gethsiyal Augasta M, T. Kathirvalavakumar
{"title":"神经网络规则提取的比较研究","authors":"Gethsiyal Augasta M, T. Kathirvalavakumar","doi":"10.1109/ICPRIME.2012.6208380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though neural networks have achieved highest classification accuracy for many classification problems, the obtained results may not be interpretable as they are often considered as black box. To overcome this drawback researchers have developed many rule extraction algorithms. This paper has discussed on various rule extraction algorithms based on three different rule extraction approaches namely decompositional, pedagogical and eclectic. Also it evaluates the performance of those approaches by comparing different algorithms with these three approaches on three real datasets namely Wisconsin breast cancer, Pima Indian diabetes and Iris plants.","PeriodicalId":148511,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Informatics and Medical Engineering (PRIME-2012)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rule extraction from neural networks — A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Gethsiyal Augasta M, T. Kathirvalavakumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPRIME.2012.6208380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Though neural networks have achieved highest classification accuracy for many classification problems, the obtained results may not be interpretable as they are often considered as black box. To overcome this drawback researchers have developed many rule extraction algorithms. This paper has discussed on various rule extraction algorithms based on three different rule extraction approaches namely decompositional, pedagogical and eclectic. Also it evaluates the performance of those approaches by comparing different algorithms with these three approaches on three real datasets namely Wisconsin breast cancer, Pima Indian diabetes and Iris plants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Informatics and Medical Engineering (PRIME-2012)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Informatics and Medical Engineering (PRIME-2012)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPRIME.2012.6208380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Informatics and Medical Engineering (PRIME-2012)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPRIME.2012.6208380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

摘要

尽管神经网络在许多分类问题上取得了最高的分类精度,但由于神经网络通常被认为是黑盒子,因此得到的结果可能无法解释。为了克服这一缺点,研究人员开发了许多规则提取算法。本文讨论了基于分解、教学和折衷三种不同的规则提取方法的各种规则提取算法。此外,它还通过比较这三种方法在三个真实数据集上的不同算法来评估这些方法的性能,这些数据集分别是威斯康星州乳腺癌、皮马印第安人糖尿病和鸢尾植物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rule extraction from neural networks — A comparative study
Though neural networks have achieved highest classification accuracy for many classification problems, the obtained results may not be interpretable as they are often considered as black box. To overcome this drawback researchers have developed many rule extraction algorithms. This paper has discussed on various rule extraction algorithms based on three different rule extraction approaches namely decompositional, pedagogical and eclectic. Also it evaluates the performance of those approaches by comparing different algorithms with these three approaches on three real datasets namely Wisconsin breast cancer, Pima Indian diabetes and Iris plants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信