左前右颞电痉挛治疗癫痫术后紧张症1例。

Dyani Loo, Daniel Evans, C. Abbott, D. Quinn
{"title":"左前右颞电痉挛治疗癫痫术后紧张症1例。","authors":"Dyani Loo, Daniel Evans, C. Abbott, D. Quinn","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Montgomery and Asberg Modified Scale (MADRS) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), at baseline and after 6 sessions. All have been validated (BPRS and MoCA) or adapted (MADRS) for use in the Portuguese population. Pretreatment and immediate posttreatment scores were as follows: BPRS, 42 and 29 (30.95% reduction); MADRS, 3 and 1 (66.7% reduction); and MOCA, 13 and 20 (53.85% improvement). Mental state examination showed marked improvement in thought organization and delusional beliefs. There were no apparent adverse effects, and the patient tolerated all treatment procedures easily. The patient was discharged with clozapine 300 mg QD and haloperidol decanoate 100 mg monthly. Although maintenance ECTwas offered, the patient dropped out after 3 maintenance treatments. Nevertheless, after 12 weeks of being treated only with haloperidol and clozapine, at equivalent or lower doses than those previously ineffective, the benefit obtained with ECT was sustained or enhanced: BPRS, 26 (38.09% reduction); MADRS, 0 (100% reduction); and MoCA, 23 (76.92% improvement).","PeriodicalId":287576,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ECT","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left Anterior-Right Temporal Electroconvulsive Therapy for Catatonia After Epilepsy Surgery: A Case Report.\",\"authors\":\"Dyani Loo, Daniel Evans, C. Abbott, D. Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Montgomery and Asberg Modified Scale (MADRS) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), at baseline and after 6 sessions. All have been validated (BPRS and MoCA) or adapted (MADRS) for use in the Portuguese population. Pretreatment and immediate posttreatment scores were as follows: BPRS, 42 and 29 (30.95% reduction); MADRS, 3 and 1 (66.7% reduction); and MOCA, 13 and 20 (53.85% improvement). Mental state examination showed marked improvement in thought organization and delusional beliefs. There were no apparent adverse effects, and the patient tolerated all treatment procedures easily. The patient was discharged with clozapine 300 mg QD and haloperidol decanoate 100 mg monthly. Although maintenance ECTwas offered, the patient dropped out after 3 maintenance treatments. Nevertheless, after 12 weeks of being treated only with haloperidol and clozapine, at equivalent or lower doses than those previously ineffective, the benefit obtained with ECT was sustained or enhanced: BPRS, 26 (38.09% reduction); MADRS, 0 (100% reduction); and MoCA, 23 (76.92% improvement).\",\"PeriodicalId\":287576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of ECT\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of ECT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ECT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神病学评定量表(BPRS),蒙哥马利和阿斯伯格修正量表(MADRS)和蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA),在基线和6个疗程后。所有这些都经过了验证(BPRS和MoCA)或改编(MADRS),以便在葡萄牙人口中使用。治疗前和治疗后立即得分分别为:BPRS, 42分和29分(降低30.95%);MADRS, 3和1(降低66.7%);MOCA分别为13和20,提高53.85%。精神状态检查显示在思维组织和妄想信念方面有明显改善。没有明显的不良反应,患者很容易耐受所有治疗程序。患者出院时给予氯氮平300 mg QD和癸酸氟哌啶醇100 mg每月。虽然给予了维持治疗,但患者在3次维持治疗后退出。然而,仅用氟哌啶醇和氯氮平治疗12周后,在与先前无效的剂量相等或更低的剂量下,ECT获得的益处得以维持或增强:BPRS, 26(减少38.09%);MADRS, 0(100%还原);MoCA 23例,提高76.92%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Left Anterior-Right Temporal Electroconvulsive Therapy for Catatonia After Epilepsy Surgery: A Case Report.
Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Montgomery and Asberg Modified Scale (MADRS) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), at baseline and after 6 sessions. All have been validated (BPRS and MoCA) or adapted (MADRS) for use in the Portuguese population. Pretreatment and immediate posttreatment scores were as follows: BPRS, 42 and 29 (30.95% reduction); MADRS, 3 and 1 (66.7% reduction); and MOCA, 13 and 20 (53.85% improvement). Mental state examination showed marked improvement in thought organization and delusional beliefs. There were no apparent adverse effects, and the patient tolerated all treatment procedures easily. The patient was discharged with clozapine 300 mg QD and haloperidol decanoate 100 mg monthly. Although maintenance ECTwas offered, the patient dropped out after 3 maintenance treatments. Nevertheless, after 12 weeks of being treated only with haloperidol and clozapine, at equivalent or lower doses than those previously ineffective, the benefit obtained with ECT was sustained or enhanced: BPRS, 26 (38.09% reduction); MADRS, 0 (100% reduction); and MoCA, 23 (76.92% improvement).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信