从程序性方法转变为声明性方法的“延续效应”是什么?

J. Siddiqi, Babak Khazaei
{"title":"从程序性方法转变为声明性方法的“延续效应”是什么?","authors":"J. Siddiqi, Babak Khazaei","doi":"10.1109/CMPSAC.1989.65169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highlights are presented of the carry-over effects in changing from a procedural to a declarative approach. The results of a case study of programming in Prolog for a relatively simple problem are reported. The different methods that the subjects used to solve the problem are described. It is argued that they can be explained on the basis of strategies used for problem decomposition and the choice of data representation. It is also argued that the methods of solution used suffer from a carry-over effect based on a procedural approach and, in particular, that the choice of data representation used appears to be more important than the paradigm used.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":339677,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual International Computer Software & Applications Conference","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the 'carry over effects' in changing from a procedural to a declarative approach?\",\"authors\":\"J. Siddiqi, Babak Khazaei\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CMPSAC.1989.65169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Highlights are presented of the carry-over effects in changing from a procedural to a declarative approach. The results of a case study of programming in Prolog for a relatively simple problem are reported. The different methods that the subjects used to solve the problem are described. It is argued that they can be explained on the basis of strategies used for problem decomposition and the choice of data representation. It is also argued that the methods of solution used suffer from a carry-over effect based on a procedural approach and, in particular, that the choice of data representation used appears to be more important than the paradigm used.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":339677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual International Computer Software & Applications Conference\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1989] Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual International Computer Software & Applications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.1989.65169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual International Computer Software & Applications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.1989.65169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重点介绍了从过程方法转变为声明方法时的遗留效应。本文报道了用Prolog对一个相对简单的问题进行编程的实例研究的结果。描述了受试者用来解决问题的不同方法。本文认为,它们可以根据问题分解的策略和数据表示的选择来解释。也有人认为,所使用的解决方法受到基于程序方法的结转效应的影响,特别是,所使用的数据表示的选择似乎比所使用的范式更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What are the 'carry over effects' in changing from a procedural to a declarative approach?
Highlights are presented of the carry-over effects in changing from a procedural to a declarative approach. The results of a case study of programming in Prolog for a relatively simple problem are reported. The different methods that the subjects used to solve the problem are described. It is argued that they can be explained on the basis of strategies used for problem decomposition and the choice of data representation. It is also argued that the methods of solution used suffer from a carry-over effect based on a procedural approach and, in particular, that the choice of data representation used appears to be more important than the paradigm used.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信