{"title":"现代婚姻神话:法律理性期望与现实法律的二分法","authors":"A. Barlow","doi":"10.46692/9781529210842.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter draws on nationally representative research from the British Social Attitudes Survey 2019, to explore the differences between the legal expectations and lived experiences of cohabitants. It demonstrates that the ‘common law marriage myth’ remains pervasive, questioning assumption of conscious, mutual and autonomous relationship decision making, and compares this with Muslim marriage myths. It then discusses how the law should respond.","PeriodicalId":279989,"journal":{"name":"Cohabitation and Religious Marriage","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern Marriage Myths: the Dichotomy Between Expectations of Legal Rationality and Lived Law\",\"authors\":\"A. Barlow\",\"doi\":\"10.46692/9781529210842.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter draws on nationally representative research from the British Social Attitudes Survey 2019, to explore the differences between the legal expectations and lived experiences of cohabitants. It demonstrates that the ‘common law marriage myth’ remains pervasive, questioning assumption of conscious, mutual and autonomous relationship decision making, and compares this with Muslim marriage myths. It then discusses how the law should respond.\",\"PeriodicalId\":279989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cohabitation and Religious Marriage\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cohabitation and Religious Marriage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529210842.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cohabitation and Religious Marriage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529210842.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modern Marriage Myths: the Dichotomy Between Expectations of Legal Rationality and Lived Law
This chapter draws on nationally representative research from the British Social Attitudes Survey 2019, to explore the differences between the legal expectations and lived experiences of cohabitants. It demonstrates that the ‘common law marriage myth’ remains pervasive, questioning assumption of conscious, mutual and autonomous relationship decision making, and compares this with Muslim marriage myths. It then discusses how the law should respond.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
