对被动踝关节行走辅助装置设计的三种方法进行了批判性检查

Scott Pardoel, Marc Doumit
{"title":"对被动踝关节行走辅助装置设计的三种方法进行了批判性检查","authors":"Scott Pardoel, Marc Doumit","doi":"10.1109/EMBSISC.2016.7508623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current ankle assist devices aim to improve the user's walking ability and stability. Despite the success of classical ankle orthoses and powered exoskeletons, these devices are still facing challenges that drive their continued development. This paper will first introduce the distinct types of ankle devices for walking assist. Then, three common approaches used in the design and development of these devices will be discussed and analyzed. These are inverse dynamics, the inverted pendulum model, and the design based on joint quasi-stiffness. The inverse dynamics approach simplifies all soft tissue contributions to a single force moment couple regardless of the source of the forces, thus making the prediction of metabolic cost very difficult. The inverted pendulum model is focused on the conservation of energy as the center of mass advances. It assumes rigid limb support and does not consider the ankle joint or the advancement of the center of pressure along the foot. The quasi-stiffness design approach attempts to translate the ankle stiffness into a combination of linear zones in order to be easily replicated with mechanical spring elements. The stiffness of the biological ankle is highly variable and dependent upon the speed of walking. Therefore devices using mechanical springs with non variable stiffness characteristics will only be effective within a narrow range of walking speeds. The current challenges faced by passive walking assist devices may be due to the methods used to assess the requirements of the body. If the parameters advised by these analytical approaches do not match the needs of the human body, the resulting devices will be inherently flawed.","PeriodicalId":361773,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE EMBS International Student Conference (ISC)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical examination of three approaches for the design of passive ankle walking assist devices\",\"authors\":\"Scott Pardoel, Marc Doumit\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EMBSISC.2016.7508623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current ankle assist devices aim to improve the user's walking ability and stability. Despite the success of classical ankle orthoses and powered exoskeletons, these devices are still facing challenges that drive their continued development. This paper will first introduce the distinct types of ankle devices for walking assist. Then, three common approaches used in the design and development of these devices will be discussed and analyzed. These are inverse dynamics, the inverted pendulum model, and the design based on joint quasi-stiffness. The inverse dynamics approach simplifies all soft tissue contributions to a single force moment couple regardless of the source of the forces, thus making the prediction of metabolic cost very difficult. The inverted pendulum model is focused on the conservation of energy as the center of mass advances. It assumes rigid limb support and does not consider the ankle joint or the advancement of the center of pressure along the foot. The quasi-stiffness design approach attempts to translate the ankle stiffness into a combination of linear zones in order to be easily replicated with mechanical spring elements. The stiffness of the biological ankle is highly variable and dependent upon the speed of walking. Therefore devices using mechanical springs with non variable stiffness characteristics will only be effective within a narrow range of walking speeds. The current challenges faced by passive walking assist devices may be due to the methods used to assess the requirements of the body. If the parameters advised by these analytical approaches do not match the needs of the human body, the resulting devices will be inherently flawed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":361773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE EMBS International Student Conference (ISC)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE EMBS International Student Conference (ISC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBSISC.2016.7508623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE EMBS International Student Conference (ISC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBSISC.2016.7508623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前的脚踝辅助设备旨在提高使用者的行走能力和稳定性。尽管传统的踝关节矫形器和动力外骨骼取得了成功,但这些设备仍然面临着推动其持续发展的挑战。本文将首先介绍不同类型的踝关节辅助行走装置。然后,将讨论和分析这些器件设计和开发中使用的三种常用方法。它们是逆动力学、倒立摆模型和基于关节准刚度的设计。逆动力学方法简化了所有软组织对单一力力矩偶的贡献,而不考虑力的来源,从而使代谢成本的预测变得非常困难。倒立摆模型关注的是随着质心的推进能量的守恒。它假定肢体有刚性支撑,不考虑踝关节或沿足压力中心的推进。准刚度设计方法试图将踝关节刚度转化为线性区域的组合,以便与机械弹簧元件轻松复制。生物踝关节的硬度是高度可变的,并且取决于行走的速度。因此,使用具有非可变刚度特性的机械弹簧的设备仅在狭窄的步行速度范围内有效。目前被动步行辅助设备面临的挑战可能是由于评估身体需求的方法。如果这些分析方法建议的参数与人体的需要不匹配,那么产生的设备就会存在固有的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A critical examination of three approaches for the design of passive ankle walking assist devices
Current ankle assist devices aim to improve the user's walking ability and stability. Despite the success of classical ankle orthoses and powered exoskeletons, these devices are still facing challenges that drive their continued development. This paper will first introduce the distinct types of ankle devices for walking assist. Then, three common approaches used in the design and development of these devices will be discussed and analyzed. These are inverse dynamics, the inverted pendulum model, and the design based on joint quasi-stiffness. The inverse dynamics approach simplifies all soft tissue contributions to a single force moment couple regardless of the source of the forces, thus making the prediction of metabolic cost very difficult. The inverted pendulum model is focused on the conservation of energy as the center of mass advances. It assumes rigid limb support and does not consider the ankle joint or the advancement of the center of pressure along the foot. The quasi-stiffness design approach attempts to translate the ankle stiffness into a combination of linear zones in order to be easily replicated with mechanical spring elements. The stiffness of the biological ankle is highly variable and dependent upon the speed of walking. Therefore devices using mechanical springs with non variable stiffness characteristics will only be effective within a narrow range of walking speeds. The current challenges faced by passive walking assist devices may be due to the methods used to assess the requirements of the body. If the parameters advised by these analytical approaches do not match the needs of the human body, the resulting devices will be inherently flawed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信