印尼和美国亵渎法的比较研究:宗教和法律方面

Febrianti Dwi Puspaningrum, Christoper Theovino Adhi
{"title":"印尼和美国亵渎法的比较研究:宗教和法律方面","authors":"Febrianti Dwi Puspaningrum, Christoper Theovino Adhi","doi":"10.15294/ciils.v2i1.59064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 29 of the 1945 Constitution states that the state is based on the One Godhead and the state guarantees the independence of each resident to embrace their own religion and to worship according to their religion and beliefs. The United States guarantees the freedom of worship and practice of religion for every citizen. This is stated in the first amendment to the United States Constitution which reads, \"Congress does not make laws regarding the formation of a religion or prohibit freedom of religion; or restrict freedom of speech, or freedom of the press, or the right to peaceful assembly, and the right to petition for demanded compensation and lodged a complaint with the government.\" Based on the constitutions of the two countries, it is clear that freedom of religion and the right to embrace religion are protected by the state and everyone is obliged to respect the beliefs held. Although constitutionally freedom of religion has been regulated by each country, the potential for criminal acts of blasphemy still exists. The policies of two different countries are influenced by the government system adopted by Indonesia using the Criminal Code as a basis for punishment for perpetrators of blasphemy, while the United States does not federally regulate blasphemy, but states are given the authority to provide protection for their citizens by making legal products that impose penalties for blasphemy.","PeriodicalId":112685,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia and America: Religious and Legal Aspects\",\"authors\":\"Febrianti Dwi Puspaningrum, Christoper Theovino Adhi\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/ciils.v2i1.59064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article 29 of the 1945 Constitution states that the state is based on the One Godhead and the state guarantees the independence of each resident to embrace their own religion and to worship according to their religion and beliefs. The United States guarantees the freedom of worship and practice of religion for every citizen. This is stated in the first amendment to the United States Constitution which reads, \\\"Congress does not make laws regarding the formation of a religion or prohibit freedom of religion; or restrict freedom of speech, or freedom of the press, or the right to peaceful assembly, and the right to petition for demanded compensation and lodged a complaint with the government.\\\" Based on the constitutions of the two countries, it is clear that freedom of religion and the right to embrace religion are protected by the state and everyone is obliged to respect the beliefs held. Although constitutionally freedom of religion has been regulated by each country, the potential for criminal acts of blasphemy still exists. The policies of two different countries are influenced by the government system adopted by Indonesia using the Criminal Code as a basis for punishment for perpetrators of blasphemy, while the United States does not federally regulate blasphemy, but states are given the authority to provide protection for their citizens by making legal products that impose penalties for blasphemy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v2i1.59064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v2i1.59064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1945年《宪法》第29条规定,国家以唯一的上帝为基础,国家保障每个居民独立信奉自己的宗教,并根据自己的宗教和信仰进行礼拜。美国保障每个公民的礼拜和宗教信仰自由。美国宪法第一修正案规定:“国会不得就宗教的形成或禁止宗教自由制定法律;或者限制言论自由、新闻自由、和平集会的权利,以及要求赔偿和向政府提出申诉的权利。”根据两国宪法,宗教自由和信仰宗教的权利受到国家的保护,每个人都有义务尊重自己的信仰。虽然每个国家都在宪法上规定了宗教自由,但亵渎罪的潜在犯罪行为仍然存在。这两个不同国家的政策受到印度尼西亚采用的政府制度的影响,印度尼西亚将《刑法》作为惩罚亵渎者的依据,而美国并没有对亵渎行为进行联邦监管,但各州有权通过制定法律产品来惩罚亵渎行为,从而为其公民提供保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia and America: Religious and Legal Aspects
Article 29 of the 1945 Constitution states that the state is based on the One Godhead and the state guarantees the independence of each resident to embrace their own religion and to worship according to their religion and beliefs. The United States guarantees the freedom of worship and practice of religion for every citizen. This is stated in the first amendment to the United States Constitution which reads, "Congress does not make laws regarding the formation of a religion or prohibit freedom of religion; or restrict freedom of speech, or freedom of the press, or the right to peaceful assembly, and the right to petition for demanded compensation and lodged a complaint with the government." Based on the constitutions of the two countries, it is clear that freedom of religion and the right to embrace religion are protected by the state and everyone is obliged to respect the beliefs held. Although constitutionally freedom of religion has been regulated by each country, the potential for criminal acts of blasphemy still exists. The policies of two different countries are influenced by the government system adopted by Indonesia using the Criminal Code as a basis for punishment for perpetrators of blasphemy, while the United States does not federally regulate blasphemy, but states are given the authority to provide protection for their citizens by making legal products that impose penalties for blasphemy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信