敏捷协作工具中意识支持的质量评估

Diogo Alberto do Espírito Santo Saraiva, Bruno Rafael de Oliveira Rodrigues, Fernando Hadad Zaidan, Fernando Silva Parreiras
{"title":"敏捷协作工具中意识支持的质量评估","authors":"Diogo Alberto do Espírito Santo Saraiva, Bruno Rafael de Oliveira Rodrigues, Fernando Hadad Zaidan, Fernando Silva Parreiras","doi":"10.1109/CLEI.2018.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) is a research field focused on understanding characteristics of interdependent group work with the objective of designing adequate computer-based technology to support cooperative work processes. One of the key concepts of CSCW is the provision of relevant information to workers in a team, a concept named awareness. As the market and research community have already perceived the importance of providing fast and reliable information among team workers, it shares the interest of CSCW in awareness improvement. This addresses the following research question: What is the quality of awareness support in agile collaborative tools? To answer this question a survey was performed with 200 users which provided feedback scores for each given design element related to support of different awareness aspects. We used a Formal Technical Review (FTR) method specifically focused on awareness assessment, named Awareness Checklist. According to this method, there are 54 design elements that influence or contribute to awareness support. Those elements can be categorized in 14 design categories, which are directly related to six awareness types: Collaborations, Location, Context, Social, Workspace and Situation. We found that Microsoft Team Foundation Server, Jira and Trello offer more collaborative aware support, however about localization and context the DotProject tool obtained the highest score, as well in Social and the Situation too. The results offer the opportunity to assess the quality of awareness in any collaborative software used in small or bigger business projects and can be used to demonstrate certain aspects of the software which can be improved to achieve their user's satisfaction. The same concept can also be used to outline the tools main advantages and disadvantages, acting as a quality reviewer that can help to choose which collaborative tools should be adopted according to categories strengths and weaknesses","PeriodicalId":379986,"journal":{"name":"2018 XLIV Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Assessment of Awareness Support in Agile Collaborative Tools\",\"authors\":\"Diogo Alberto do Espírito Santo Saraiva, Bruno Rafael de Oliveira Rodrigues, Fernando Hadad Zaidan, Fernando Silva Parreiras\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CLEI.2018.00013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) is a research field focused on understanding characteristics of interdependent group work with the objective of designing adequate computer-based technology to support cooperative work processes. One of the key concepts of CSCW is the provision of relevant information to workers in a team, a concept named awareness. As the market and research community have already perceived the importance of providing fast and reliable information among team workers, it shares the interest of CSCW in awareness improvement. This addresses the following research question: What is the quality of awareness support in agile collaborative tools? To answer this question a survey was performed with 200 users which provided feedback scores for each given design element related to support of different awareness aspects. We used a Formal Technical Review (FTR) method specifically focused on awareness assessment, named Awareness Checklist. According to this method, there are 54 design elements that influence or contribute to awareness support. Those elements can be categorized in 14 design categories, which are directly related to six awareness types: Collaborations, Location, Context, Social, Workspace and Situation. We found that Microsoft Team Foundation Server, Jira and Trello offer more collaborative aware support, however about localization and context the DotProject tool obtained the highest score, as well in Social and the Situation too. The results offer the opportunity to assess the quality of awareness in any collaborative software used in small or bigger business projects and can be used to demonstrate certain aspects of the software which can be improved to achieve their user's satisfaction. The same concept can also be used to outline the tools main advantages and disadvantages, acting as a quality reviewer that can help to choose which collaborative tools should be adopted according to categories strengths and weaknesses\",\"PeriodicalId\":379986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 XLIV Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI)\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 XLIV Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI.2018.00013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 XLIV Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI.2018.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

计算机支持的协同工作(CSCW)是一个研究领域,其重点是了解相互依赖的群体工作的特征,目的是设计适当的基于计算机的技术来支持协同工作过程。CSCW的一个关键概念是向团队中的员工提供相关信息,这个概念被称为意识。由于市场和研究界已经认识到在团队工作人员中提供快速和可靠的信息的重要性,因此他们与CSCW共同关注提高意识。这解决了以下研究问题:敏捷协作工具中的意识支持质量是什么?为了回答这个问题,我们对200名用户进行了一项调查,为每个给定的设计元素提供反馈分数,这些元素与支持不同的意识方面有关。我们使用正式技术审查(FTR)方法,特别关注意识评估,称为意识检查表。根据这种方法,有54个设计元素影响或有助于意识支持。这些元素可以分为14个设计类别,它们与六种意识类型直接相关:协作、位置、上下文、社会、工作空间和情况。我们发现Microsoft Team Foundation Server、Jira和Trello提供了更多的协作意识支持,但在本地化和上下文方面,DotProject工具获得了最高分,在社交和情境方面也是如此。结果提供了评估在小型或大型商业项目中使用的任何协作软件的意识质量的机会,并且可以用来演示软件的某些方面,这些方面可以改进以达到用户的满意度。同样的概念也可以用来概述工具的主要优点和缺点,作为一个质量审查者,可以根据类别的优点和缺点来帮助选择应该采用哪些协作工具
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Assessment of Awareness Support in Agile Collaborative Tools
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) is a research field focused on understanding characteristics of interdependent group work with the objective of designing adequate computer-based technology to support cooperative work processes. One of the key concepts of CSCW is the provision of relevant information to workers in a team, a concept named awareness. As the market and research community have already perceived the importance of providing fast and reliable information among team workers, it shares the interest of CSCW in awareness improvement. This addresses the following research question: What is the quality of awareness support in agile collaborative tools? To answer this question a survey was performed with 200 users which provided feedback scores for each given design element related to support of different awareness aspects. We used a Formal Technical Review (FTR) method specifically focused on awareness assessment, named Awareness Checklist. According to this method, there are 54 design elements that influence or contribute to awareness support. Those elements can be categorized in 14 design categories, which are directly related to six awareness types: Collaborations, Location, Context, Social, Workspace and Situation. We found that Microsoft Team Foundation Server, Jira and Trello offer more collaborative aware support, however about localization and context the DotProject tool obtained the highest score, as well in Social and the Situation too. The results offer the opportunity to assess the quality of awareness in any collaborative software used in small or bigger business projects and can be used to demonstrate certain aspects of the software which can be improved to achieve their user's satisfaction. The same concept can also be used to outline the tools main advantages and disadvantages, acting as a quality reviewer that can help to choose which collaborative tools should be adopted according to categories strengths and weaknesses
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信