希尼的神话方法:《底比斯之葬》中的现代主义来世

M. McGuire
{"title":"希尼的神话方法:《底比斯之葬》中的现代主义来世","authors":"M. McGuire","doi":"10.16995/C21.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay analyses the relationship between myth and modernity in The Burial at Thebes (2004), Seamus Heaney’s adaptation of Antigone. It focuses on the poet’s cultivation of what T.S. Eliot, in his review of Ulysses, called the mythic method; that is, ‘the art of holding a classical safety net under the tottering data of the contemporary.’ If, for Eliot, the mythic method was part of a reactionary disavowal of modernity, for Heaney it belongs to a more progressive political and aesthetic agenda. Drawing on debates from New Modernist Studies, the article traces and interrogates the significance of the mythic method within Heaney’s landmark play. In doing so it demonstrates the ways in which the legacies of modernism continue to shape Irish writing in the twenty-first century.","PeriodicalId":272809,"journal":{"name":"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heaney’s Mythic Method: Modernist Afterlives in The Burial at Thebes\",\"authors\":\"M. McGuire\",\"doi\":\"10.16995/C21.72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay analyses the relationship between myth and modernity in The Burial at Thebes (2004), Seamus Heaney’s adaptation of Antigone. It focuses on the poet’s cultivation of what T.S. Eliot, in his review of Ulysses, called the mythic method; that is, ‘the art of holding a classical safety net under the tottering data of the contemporary.’ If, for Eliot, the mythic method was part of a reactionary disavowal of modernity, for Heaney it belongs to a more progressive political and aesthetic agenda. Drawing on debates from New Modernist Studies, the article traces and interrogates the significance of the mythic method within Heaney’s landmark play. In doing so it demonstrates the ways in which the legacies of modernism continue to shape Irish writing in the twenty-first century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16995/C21.72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/C21.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了希尼根据《安提戈涅》改编的小说《底比斯之葬》(2004)中神话与现代性的关系。它着重于诗人对艾略特在《尤利西斯》的评论中所说的“神话方法”的培养;也就是说,它是“在摇摇欲坠的当代数据之下,保持古典安全网的艺术”。如果说,对于艾略特来说,神话方法是对现代性的反动否定的一部分,那么对于希尼来说,它属于一种更进步的政治和美学议程。从新现代主义研究的争论中,本文追溯并询问了希尼具有里程碑意义的戏剧中神话方法的意义。在这样做的过程中,它展示了现代主义的遗产在二十一世纪继续塑造爱尔兰写作的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heaney’s Mythic Method: Modernist Afterlives in The Burial at Thebes
This essay analyses the relationship between myth and modernity in The Burial at Thebes (2004), Seamus Heaney’s adaptation of Antigone. It focuses on the poet’s cultivation of what T.S. Eliot, in his review of Ulysses, called the mythic method; that is, ‘the art of holding a classical safety net under the tottering data of the contemporary.’ If, for Eliot, the mythic method was part of a reactionary disavowal of modernity, for Heaney it belongs to a more progressive political and aesthetic agenda. Drawing on debates from New Modernist Studies, the article traces and interrogates the significance of the mythic method within Heaney’s landmark play. In doing so it demonstrates the ways in which the legacies of modernism continue to shape Irish writing in the twenty-first century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信