基于仿真优化方法的MTO供应链批量问题比较研究

A. Ammeri, H. Chabchoub, Wafik Hachicha, F. Masmoudi
{"title":"基于仿真优化方法的MTO供应链批量问题比较研究","authors":"A. Ammeri, H. Chabchoub, Wafik Hachicha, F. Masmoudi","doi":"10.1109/LOGISTIQUA.2011.5939309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the lot sizing problem in Make To Order (MTO) supply chain solved by simulation optimization (SO) approach. A comprehensive case study which presented in detail involves a multi-stage, multi-product, multi-location, multi-resource with setup, capacity constraints and stochastic demand. The case study objective is to determine a fixed optimal lot size for each manufactured product type that will ensure Order Mean Flow Time (OMFT) target value for each finished product type. For a comparative purpose, three SO methods are used: (1) A metamodel method based on Response Surface Methodology (RSM), (2) A metamodel method based on Factorial Design, and (3) Global Search method based simultaneously on Tabu Search, Neural Networks, and Scatter Search. Methods (1) and (2) have been treated in the literature with a manual based approach, while the method (3) using the OptQuest Software will be more addressed in this paper,. The results of the comparative study show that the first method which is based on RSM is very effective while the third one is very practical and gives a good satisfactory solution.","PeriodicalId":324478,"journal":{"name":"2011 4th International Conference on Logistics","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of lot sizing problem in MTO supply chain based on simulation optimization approach\",\"authors\":\"A. Ammeri, H. Chabchoub, Wafik Hachicha, F. Masmoudi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LOGISTIQUA.2011.5939309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with the lot sizing problem in Make To Order (MTO) supply chain solved by simulation optimization (SO) approach. A comprehensive case study which presented in detail involves a multi-stage, multi-product, multi-location, multi-resource with setup, capacity constraints and stochastic demand. The case study objective is to determine a fixed optimal lot size for each manufactured product type that will ensure Order Mean Flow Time (OMFT) target value for each finished product type. For a comparative purpose, three SO methods are used: (1) A metamodel method based on Response Surface Methodology (RSM), (2) A metamodel method based on Factorial Design, and (3) Global Search method based simultaneously on Tabu Search, Neural Networks, and Scatter Search. Methods (1) and (2) have been treated in the literature with a manual based approach, while the method (3) using the OptQuest Software will be more addressed in this paper,. The results of the comparative study show that the first method which is based on RSM is very effective while the third one is very practical and gives a good satisfactory solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 4th International Conference on Logistics\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 4th International Conference on Logistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LOGISTIQUA.2011.5939309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 4th International Conference on Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LOGISTIQUA.2011.5939309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文研究了用仿真优化方法求解订单制造(MTO)供应链中的批量问题。详细介绍了一个多阶段、多产品、多地点、多资源、设置、容量约束和随机需求的综合案例研究。案例研究的目标是确定每种制造产品类型的固定最佳批量,以确保每种成品类型的订单平均流程时间(OMFT)目标值。为了进行比较,采用了三种SO方法:(1)基于响应面方法(RSM)的元模型方法,(2)基于析因设计的元模型方法,(3)同时基于禁忌搜索、神经网络和分散搜索的全局搜索方法。方法(1)和(2)已经在文献中使用基于手动的方法进行了处理,而使用OptQuest软件的方法(3)将在本文中得到更多的解决。对比研究结果表明,基于RSM的第一种方法是非常有效的,而基于RSM的第三种方法是非常实用的,并给出了令人满意的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of lot sizing problem in MTO supply chain based on simulation optimization approach
This paper deals with the lot sizing problem in Make To Order (MTO) supply chain solved by simulation optimization (SO) approach. A comprehensive case study which presented in detail involves a multi-stage, multi-product, multi-location, multi-resource with setup, capacity constraints and stochastic demand. The case study objective is to determine a fixed optimal lot size for each manufactured product type that will ensure Order Mean Flow Time (OMFT) target value for each finished product type. For a comparative purpose, three SO methods are used: (1) A metamodel method based on Response Surface Methodology (RSM), (2) A metamodel method based on Factorial Design, and (3) Global Search method based simultaneously on Tabu Search, Neural Networks, and Scatter Search. Methods (1) and (2) have been treated in the literature with a manual based approach, while the method (3) using the OptQuest Software will be more addressed in this paper,. The results of the comparative study show that the first method which is based on RSM is very effective while the third one is very practical and gives a good satisfactory solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信