保护欧盟内部的民主:论第7条TEU和匈牙利转向威权主义

B. Bugarič
{"title":"保护欧盟内部的民主:论第7条TEU和匈牙利转向威权主义","authors":"B. Bugarič","doi":"10.1017/CBO9781316258774.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union is facing a unique historical situation: a political club of democratic regimes established primarily to promote peace and prosperity in post-World War II Europe is confronted with the first EU member state ever sliding into an authoritarian illiberal political regime. The Fidesz government achieved a fundamental revision of the rules of the constitutional and political order in Hungary. In only five years it managed to transform Hungary from one of the success stories of the transition from Communism to democracy into a semi-authoritarian regime based on an illiberal constitutional order by systematically dismantling checks and balances, undermining the rule of law, limiting independence of judiciary, almost destroying press freedom, attacking civil society and increasing executive power. As a consequence, the new Hungarian constitutional order is in a direct conflict with the ‘fundamental values’ of the EU “political” constitution, such as democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights. One of the most important legal questions facing Europe today is how well is the EU equipped, legally and politically, to defend democracy and the rule of law in its member states?While EU constitutional law contains a legal provision designed to deal with such a situation, this provision is often criticized as largely inadequate to provide for a toolkit with which to intervene effectively in the internal matters of member states. A major problem surrounding the debate whether to use or not to use Article 7 in case of Hungary has less to do with the legal intricacies of Article 7 than with the absence of political will to use it. The current EU economic and political crises have weakened the ability of the EU institutions to effectively tackle the Hungarian problem. With trust in EU at an all time low and with unwillingness of the EU political elites to adequately acknowledge the gravity of the Hungarian problem, it is quite unlikely that sanctions, even if imposed, would actually achieve desired results.","PeriodicalId":250773,"journal":{"name":"LSN: International & Comparative Law (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protecting Democracy Inside the EU: On Article 7 TEU and the Hungarian Turn to Authoritarianism, in CLOSA\",\"authors\":\"B. Bugarič\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/CBO9781316258774.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Union is facing a unique historical situation: a political club of democratic regimes established primarily to promote peace and prosperity in post-World War II Europe is confronted with the first EU member state ever sliding into an authoritarian illiberal political regime. The Fidesz government achieved a fundamental revision of the rules of the constitutional and political order in Hungary. In only five years it managed to transform Hungary from one of the success stories of the transition from Communism to democracy into a semi-authoritarian regime based on an illiberal constitutional order by systematically dismantling checks and balances, undermining the rule of law, limiting independence of judiciary, almost destroying press freedom, attacking civil society and increasing executive power. As a consequence, the new Hungarian constitutional order is in a direct conflict with the ‘fundamental values’ of the EU “political” constitution, such as democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights. One of the most important legal questions facing Europe today is how well is the EU equipped, legally and politically, to defend democracy and the rule of law in its member states?While EU constitutional law contains a legal provision designed to deal with such a situation, this provision is often criticized as largely inadequate to provide for a toolkit with which to intervene effectively in the internal matters of member states. A major problem surrounding the debate whether to use or not to use Article 7 in case of Hungary has less to do with the legal intricacies of Article 7 than with the absence of political will to use it. The current EU economic and political crises have weakened the ability of the EU institutions to effectively tackle the Hungarian problem. With trust in EU at an all time low and with unwillingness of the EU political elites to adequately acknowledge the gravity of the Hungarian problem, it is quite unlikely that sanctions, even if imposed, would actually achieve desired results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: International & Comparative Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: International & Comparative Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316258774.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: International & Comparative Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316258774.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

欧盟正面临着一个独特的历史局面:一个主要是为了促进二战后欧洲的和平与繁荣而建立的民主政权政治俱乐部,正面临着第一个陷入威权主义、不自由政治体制的欧盟成员国。青民盟政府实现了对匈牙利宪法和政治秩序规则的根本修改。在短短五年的时间里,它成功地将匈牙利从一个从共产主义向民主过渡的成功故事转变为一个基于非自由宪法秩序的半专制政权,通过系统地破坏制衡,破坏法治,限制司法独立,几乎摧毁新闻自由,攻击公民社会和增加行政权力。因此,新的匈牙利宪法秩序与欧盟“政治”宪法的“基本价值”直接冲突,如民主、法治和尊重人权。当今欧洲面临的最重要的法律问题之一是,欧盟在法律上和政治上有多大能力捍卫其成员国的民主和法治?虽然欧盟宪法包含了旨在处理这种情况的法律条款,但这一条款经常被批评为在很大程度上不足以提供有效干预成员国内部事务的工具包。围绕在匈牙利问题上是否使用第7条的辩论的一个主要问题与其说是与第7条的法律复杂性有关,不如说是与缺乏使用它的政治意愿有关。当前欧盟的经济和政治危机削弱了欧盟机构有效解决匈牙利问题的能力。由于对欧盟的信任处于历史最低点,加上欧盟政治精英不愿充分承认匈牙利问题的严重性,即使实施制裁,也不太可能真正取得预期的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protecting Democracy Inside the EU: On Article 7 TEU and the Hungarian Turn to Authoritarianism, in CLOSA
The European Union is facing a unique historical situation: a political club of democratic regimes established primarily to promote peace and prosperity in post-World War II Europe is confronted with the first EU member state ever sliding into an authoritarian illiberal political regime. The Fidesz government achieved a fundamental revision of the rules of the constitutional and political order in Hungary. In only five years it managed to transform Hungary from one of the success stories of the transition from Communism to democracy into a semi-authoritarian regime based on an illiberal constitutional order by systematically dismantling checks and balances, undermining the rule of law, limiting independence of judiciary, almost destroying press freedom, attacking civil society and increasing executive power. As a consequence, the new Hungarian constitutional order is in a direct conflict with the ‘fundamental values’ of the EU “political” constitution, such as democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights. One of the most important legal questions facing Europe today is how well is the EU equipped, legally and politically, to defend democracy and the rule of law in its member states?While EU constitutional law contains a legal provision designed to deal with such a situation, this provision is often criticized as largely inadequate to provide for a toolkit with which to intervene effectively in the internal matters of member states. A major problem surrounding the debate whether to use or not to use Article 7 in case of Hungary has less to do with the legal intricacies of Article 7 than with the absence of political will to use it. The current EU economic and political crises have weakened the ability of the EU institutions to effectively tackle the Hungarian problem. With trust in EU at an all time low and with unwillingness of the EU political elites to adequately acknowledge the gravity of the Hungarian problem, it is quite unlikely that sanctions, even if imposed, would actually achieve desired results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信