益生菌对艰难梭菌感染高危抗生素患者的临床影响

J. Dickson, W. Hung, Tai-Tsang Chen
{"title":"益生菌对艰难梭菌感染高危抗生素患者的临床影响","authors":"J. Dickson, W. Hung, Tai-Tsang Chen","doi":"10.4172/2472-1891.100018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance: Despite recommendations not to routinely use probiotics for primary prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) from Updated Practice Guidelines for CDI in 2010 by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the use of probiotics remains common among prescribers and patients. To our knowledge, there has been no analysis conducted to evaluate the impact of probiotics on the primary prevention of CDI among patients receiving antibiotics known to be associated with an increased risk of CDI. \nObjective: To determine whether patients who receive “high-risk” antibiotics along with probiotics are at a decreased risk of developing CDI. \nDesign, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective cohort study including adult patients admitted to Yale New Haven Hospital, Saint Raphael Campus, between July 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010. Patients were excluded if they did not receive high-risk antibiotic(s) for more than 5 days nor had a history of CDI. \nInterventions: Eligible patients were then analyzed based on whether they had received concomitant use of probiotics or antibiotics alone. \nMain outcome(s) and measure(s): The primary outcome of the study was the development of CDI within 90 days of high-risk antibiotic use. \nResults: A total of 389 patients were included in the study. CDI occurred in 8.4% (12/143) of patients who received concomitant probiotics as opposed to 3.3% (8/246) that had CDI and received antibiotics alone with relative risk (RR) of 2.58 (95% CI: 1.08, 6.16; p=0.033). A chi-square analysis identified statistically significant differences in age (p<0.0001) and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) utilization (p=0.0088), but the imbalance between patients with and without probiotics was removed after adjusting for the propensity score (p=0.1141). \n Conclusion and relevance: We found that use of antibiotics along with probiotics had a significantly higher incidence of CDI than those who did not receive probiotics. Our findings based on adjusted odds ratio do not support the recommendation of the routine use of probiotics for the prevention of CDI. Other strategies such as eliminating the unnecessary use of PPI should be applied to prevent CDI.","PeriodicalId":355284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Impact of Probiotics among Patients Receiving Antibiotics with a High Risk of Acquiring Clostridium difficile Infection\",\"authors\":\"J. Dickson, W. Hung, Tai-Tsang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2472-1891.100018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Importance: Despite recommendations not to routinely use probiotics for primary prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) from Updated Practice Guidelines for CDI in 2010 by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the use of probiotics remains common among prescribers and patients. To our knowledge, there has been no analysis conducted to evaluate the impact of probiotics on the primary prevention of CDI among patients receiving antibiotics known to be associated with an increased risk of CDI. \\nObjective: To determine whether patients who receive “high-risk” antibiotics along with probiotics are at a decreased risk of developing CDI. \\nDesign, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective cohort study including adult patients admitted to Yale New Haven Hospital, Saint Raphael Campus, between July 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010. Patients were excluded if they did not receive high-risk antibiotic(s) for more than 5 days nor had a history of CDI. \\nInterventions: Eligible patients were then analyzed based on whether they had received concomitant use of probiotics or antibiotics alone. \\nMain outcome(s) and measure(s): The primary outcome of the study was the development of CDI within 90 days of high-risk antibiotic use. \\nResults: A total of 389 patients were included in the study. CDI occurred in 8.4% (12/143) of patients who received concomitant probiotics as opposed to 3.3% (8/246) that had CDI and received antibiotics alone with relative risk (RR) of 2.58 (95% CI: 1.08, 6.16; p=0.033). A chi-square analysis identified statistically significant differences in age (p<0.0001) and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) utilization (p=0.0088), but the imbalance between patients with and without probiotics was removed after adjusting for the propensity score (p=0.1141). \\n Conclusion and relevance: We found that use of antibiotics along with probiotics had a significantly higher incidence of CDI than those who did not receive probiotics. Our findings based on adjusted odds ratio do not support the recommendation of the routine use of probiotics for the prevention of CDI. Other strategies such as eliminating the unnecessary use of PPI should be applied to prevent CDI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1891.100018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1891.100018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:尽管美国卫生保健流行病学学会和美国传染病学会在2010年的CDI更新实践指南中建议不要常规使用益生菌来预防艰难梭菌感染(CDI),但益生菌的使用在处方者和患者中仍然很常见。据我们所知,目前还没有分析评估益生菌对接受抗生素的患者CDI一级预防的影响,已知抗生素与CDI风险增加有关。目的:确定接受“高风险”抗生素和益生菌治疗的患者发生CDI的风险是否降低。设计、环境和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括2010年7月1日至2010年12月31日期间在耶鲁大学纽黑文医院圣拉斐尔校区住院的成年患者。如果患者没有接受高危抗生素超过5天,也没有CDI病史,则排除。干预措施:然后分析符合条件的患者是否同时使用益生菌或单独使用抗生素。主要结局和衡量指标:研究的主要结局是高危抗生素使用后90天内CDI的发生情况。结果:共纳入389例患者。服用联合益生菌的患者发生CDI的比例为8.4%(12/143),而服用CDI并单独服用抗生素的患者发生CDI的比例为3.3%(8/246),相对危险度(RR)为2.58 (95% CI: 1.08, 6.16;p = 0.033)。卡方分析发现年龄(p<0.0001)和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)使用率(p=0.0088)存在统计学差异,但在调整倾向评分(p=0.1141)后,消除了服用和不服用益生菌患者之间的不平衡。结论和相关性:我们发现使用抗生素和益生菌的CDI发生率明显高于未使用益生菌的患者。我们基于调整优势比的研究结果不支持常规使用益生菌预防CDI的建议。其他策略,如消除不必要的PPI使用,应适用于预防CDI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Impact of Probiotics among Patients Receiving Antibiotics with a High Risk of Acquiring Clostridium difficile Infection
Importance: Despite recommendations not to routinely use probiotics for primary prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) from Updated Practice Guidelines for CDI in 2010 by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the use of probiotics remains common among prescribers and patients. To our knowledge, there has been no analysis conducted to evaluate the impact of probiotics on the primary prevention of CDI among patients receiving antibiotics known to be associated with an increased risk of CDI. Objective: To determine whether patients who receive “high-risk” antibiotics along with probiotics are at a decreased risk of developing CDI. Design, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective cohort study including adult patients admitted to Yale New Haven Hospital, Saint Raphael Campus, between July 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010. Patients were excluded if they did not receive high-risk antibiotic(s) for more than 5 days nor had a history of CDI. Interventions: Eligible patients were then analyzed based on whether they had received concomitant use of probiotics or antibiotics alone. Main outcome(s) and measure(s): The primary outcome of the study was the development of CDI within 90 days of high-risk antibiotic use. Results: A total of 389 patients were included in the study. CDI occurred in 8.4% (12/143) of patients who received concomitant probiotics as opposed to 3.3% (8/246) that had CDI and received antibiotics alone with relative risk (RR) of 2.58 (95% CI: 1.08, 6.16; p=0.033). A chi-square analysis identified statistically significant differences in age (p<0.0001) and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) utilization (p=0.0088), but the imbalance between patients with and without probiotics was removed after adjusting for the propensity score (p=0.1141). Conclusion and relevance: We found that use of antibiotics along with probiotics had a significantly higher incidence of CDI than those who did not receive probiotics. Our findings based on adjusted odds ratio do not support the recommendation of the routine use of probiotics for the prevention of CDI. Other strategies such as eliminating the unnecessary use of PPI should be applied to prevent CDI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信