{"title":"意外的惊喜","authors":"Natasha S. Guinan","doi":"10.1080/10903770123863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In volume 4.2 of Philosophy and Geography, our editorial staff faced the dif cult but welcome task, following our double-blind peer referring process, of selecting from among our many high quality submissions. I should have expected this welcome task, as my experience so far working at P&G has taught me to expect the unexpected. From a new interdisciplinary marriage, expect articles that genuinely re ect the rich intellectual debates of both disciplines; from the transition to a semi-annual format, expect too many high quality submissions to publish in any one volume; best of all, amongst the submissions, expect to nd thematic links and a natural “ t” between contributors for each publication. Volume 4.2 meets all these expectations. Our lead article, “Urban Planning in the Founding of Cartesian Thought,” by Abraham Akkerman, sets the tone for this issue. Akkerman’s piece explores the geographical and intellectual con uence of Renaissance urban planning with René Descartes’s notion of “clear and distinct” ideas. Professor Akkerman’s article is a bold, suggestive, and provocative piece that nicely underscores the interdisciplinary commitments of P&G, and evidences the exciting new work that is possible from a bridging of the disciplines of philosophy and geography. In “Wind, Energy, Landscape: Reconciling Nature and Technology,” by Gordon G. Brittan Jr., Professor Brittan departs from his more traditional intellectual pursuits to offer us an aesthetic critique of contemporary wind energy devices ground in his own passionate pursuit of a life more integrated with, and respectful of, his rural Montana home. Professor Brittan is well suited to offer us this critique. Both philosopher and inventor, he has developed an alternative environmental wind energy device, the Windjammer, which satis es the arguable necessity of combining clean energy, creativity, and beauty. Ben Minteer’s article, “Wilderness and the Wise Province: Benton MacKaye’s Pragmatic Vision” provides us with an account of MacKaye’s pragmatic environmental vision concerning wilderness conservation, principally through the latter’s novel and lasting contribution of the Appalachian Trail to the American environmental experience. Those who enjoyed Bill Bryson’s best-selling A Walk in the Woods (NY: Broadway Books, 1998), a celebration of a failed hike of the approximately 2,150 miles of the trail from Georgia to Maine (the exact length of the trail is a matter of some dispute), will especially nd stimulating Minteer’s account of the relevance of MacKaye’s vision to contemporary environmental policy-making. Eduardo Mendieta contributes the nal article in this volume, “The City and the Philosopher: On the Urbanism of Phenomen-","PeriodicalId":431617,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Geography","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serendipity\",\"authors\":\"Natasha S. Guinan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903770123863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In volume 4.2 of Philosophy and Geography, our editorial staff faced the dif cult but welcome task, following our double-blind peer referring process, of selecting from among our many high quality submissions. I should have expected this welcome task, as my experience so far working at P&G has taught me to expect the unexpected. From a new interdisciplinary marriage, expect articles that genuinely re ect the rich intellectual debates of both disciplines; from the transition to a semi-annual format, expect too many high quality submissions to publish in any one volume; best of all, amongst the submissions, expect to nd thematic links and a natural “ t” between contributors for each publication. Volume 4.2 meets all these expectations. Our lead article, “Urban Planning in the Founding of Cartesian Thought,” by Abraham Akkerman, sets the tone for this issue. Akkerman’s piece explores the geographical and intellectual con uence of Renaissance urban planning with René Descartes’s notion of “clear and distinct” ideas. Professor Akkerman’s article is a bold, suggestive, and provocative piece that nicely underscores the interdisciplinary commitments of P&G, and evidences the exciting new work that is possible from a bridging of the disciplines of philosophy and geography. In “Wind, Energy, Landscape: Reconciling Nature and Technology,” by Gordon G. Brittan Jr., Professor Brittan departs from his more traditional intellectual pursuits to offer us an aesthetic critique of contemporary wind energy devices ground in his own passionate pursuit of a life more integrated with, and respectful of, his rural Montana home. Professor Brittan is well suited to offer us this critique. Both philosopher and inventor, he has developed an alternative environmental wind energy device, the Windjammer, which satis es the arguable necessity of combining clean energy, creativity, and beauty. Ben Minteer’s article, “Wilderness and the Wise Province: Benton MacKaye’s Pragmatic Vision” provides us with an account of MacKaye’s pragmatic environmental vision concerning wilderness conservation, principally through the latter’s novel and lasting contribution of the Appalachian Trail to the American environmental experience. Those who enjoyed Bill Bryson’s best-selling A Walk in the Woods (NY: Broadway Books, 1998), a celebration of a failed hike of the approximately 2,150 miles of the trail from Georgia to Maine (the exact length of the trail is a matter of some dispute), will especially nd stimulating Minteer’s account of the relevance of MacKaye’s vision to contemporary environmental policy-making. Eduardo Mendieta contributes the nal article in this volume, “The City and the Philosopher: On the Urbanism of Phenomen-\",\"PeriodicalId\":431617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy & Geography\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy & Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903770123863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903770123863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36
摘要
在《哲学与地理》第4.2卷中,我们的编辑人员面临着一项艰巨但受欢迎的任务,即按照我们的双盲同行参考程序,从众多高质量的投稿中进行选择。我本应该预料到这项受欢迎的任务,因为我迄今在宝洁的工作经历教会了我要预料到意想不到的事情。从一个新的跨学科的结合中,期望文章真正反映两个学科丰富的知识辩论;从过渡到半年出版一次的格式,期望在任何一卷中发表太多高质量的投稿;最重要的是,在提交的内容中,期望在每个出版物的贡献者之间建立一个主题链接和自然的“链接”。第4.2卷满足了所有这些期望。我们的头条文章《笛卡尔思想的城市规划》由亚伯拉罕·阿克曼撰写,为这一问题奠定了基调。阿克曼的作品探讨了文艺复兴时期城市规划的地理和知识影响,以及笛卡尔“清晰而独特”的概念。阿克曼教授的文章是一篇大胆、富有启发性和挑衅性的文章,它很好地强调了宝洁的跨学科承诺,并证明了哲学和地理学科之间的桥梁可能带来令人兴奋的新工作。在小戈登·g·布里坦(Gordon G. Brittan Jr.)的《风、能源、景观:调和自然与技术》(Wind, Energy, Landscape: Reconciling Nature and Technology)一书中,布里坦教授脱离了他更为传统的知识追求,以他自己对生活的热情追求为基础,为我们提供了一种对当代风能设备的美学批评,这种生活与他在蒙大拿州农村的家更加融合,更加尊重。布里坦教授很适合向我们提出这种批评。作为哲学家和发明家,他开发了一种可替代的环保风能设备,Windjammer,它满足了将清洁能源,创造力和美感结合起来的有争议的必要性。本·明特尔的文章《荒野与智慧省:本顿·麦凯的实用主义愿景》向我们介绍了麦凯关于荒野保护的实用主义环境愿景,主要是通过后者对阿巴拉契亚山道对美国环境经验的新颖而持久的贡献。那些喜欢比尔·布莱森(Bill Bryson)的畅销书《林中漫步》(纽约:百老汇图书公司,1998年)的人,这本书庆祝了一次从乔治亚州到缅因州的大约2150英里的徒步旅行的失败(这条路的确切长度是一个有争议的问题),尤其会激发米特尔对麦凯的观点与当代环境政策制定的相关性的描述。爱德华多·门迭塔(Eduardo Mendieta)为《城市与哲学家:论现象的城市主义》这一卷提供了《城市日报》的文章
In volume 4.2 of Philosophy and Geography, our editorial staff faced the dif cult but welcome task, following our double-blind peer referring process, of selecting from among our many high quality submissions. I should have expected this welcome task, as my experience so far working at P&G has taught me to expect the unexpected. From a new interdisciplinary marriage, expect articles that genuinely re ect the rich intellectual debates of both disciplines; from the transition to a semi-annual format, expect too many high quality submissions to publish in any one volume; best of all, amongst the submissions, expect to nd thematic links and a natural “ t” between contributors for each publication. Volume 4.2 meets all these expectations. Our lead article, “Urban Planning in the Founding of Cartesian Thought,” by Abraham Akkerman, sets the tone for this issue. Akkerman’s piece explores the geographical and intellectual con uence of Renaissance urban planning with René Descartes’s notion of “clear and distinct” ideas. Professor Akkerman’s article is a bold, suggestive, and provocative piece that nicely underscores the interdisciplinary commitments of P&G, and evidences the exciting new work that is possible from a bridging of the disciplines of philosophy and geography. In “Wind, Energy, Landscape: Reconciling Nature and Technology,” by Gordon G. Brittan Jr., Professor Brittan departs from his more traditional intellectual pursuits to offer us an aesthetic critique of contemporary wind energy devices ground in his own passionate pursuit of a life more integrated with, and respectful of, his rural Montana home. Professor Brittan is well suited to offer us this critique. Both philosopher and inventor, he has developed an alternative environmental wind energy device, the Windjammer, which satis es the arguable necessity of combining clean energy, creativity, and beauty. Ben Minteer’s article, “Wilderness and the Wise Province: Benton MacKaye’s Pragmatic Vision” provides us with an account of MacKaye’s pragmatic environmental vision concerning wilderness conservation, principally through the latter’s novel and lasting contribution of the Appalachian Trail to the American environmental experience. Those who enjoyed Bill Bryson’s best-selling A Walk in the Woods (NY: Broadway Books, 1998), a celebration of a failed hike of the approximately 2,150 miles of the trail from Georgia to Maine (the exact length of the trail is a matter of some dispute), will especially nd stimulating Minteer’s account of the relevance of MacKaye’s vision to contemporary environmental policy-making. Eduardo Mendieta contributes the nal article in this volume, “The City and the Philosopher: On the Urbanism of Phenomen-