金融部门的气候情绪:金融市场、政策和法规如何产生障碍和机会,使投资组合符合可持续性

I. Monasterolo, N. Glas, Sabine Kunesch
{"title":"金融部门的气候情绪:金融市场、政策和法规如何产生障碍和机会,使投资组合符合可持续性","authors":"I. Monasterolo, N. Glas, Sabine Kunesch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3659459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investments are largely allocated to sectors of economic activities that are at odds with the climate targets, thus exposing countries’ economies and investors’ portfolios to the risk of carbon stranded assets. In this context, a main knowledge gap is represented by the poor understanding of financial actors’ perception of the climate-related financial risks and opportunities in the transition to a low-carbon economy, and of the barriers and enablers to manage climate-related financial risks in investors’ portfolios. We contribute to fill this knowledge gap by developing and applying a transdisciplinary approach to knowledge co-production engaging climate finance stakeholders (from public and private financial institutions, policy making, civil society and academia) in surveys, focus groups and dedicated workshops around main aspects of the climate finance debate, with a focus on Austria. Results show that climate-related financial risk understanding and perception are largely heterogeneous across financial actors. Lack of stable climate policies and regulations, of standardized sustainability scores of financial contracts, and of financial risk pricing tools represent main barriers to mainstream climate considerations in portfolios’ risk management. In contrast, role of disclosure, of policy coherence and social engagement contributes to overcome such barriers decreasing market uncertainty. These results are relevant for the implementation of the Austrian and European sustainable finance policy agenda, and for current debate on the alignment of COVID-19 recovery policies with the EU Green Deal agenda.","PeriodicalId":154391,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets Regulation (Topic)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate Sentiments in the Financial Sector: How Financial Markets, Policies and Regulations Generate Barriers and Opportunities to Align Portfolios to Sustainability\",\"authors\":\"I. Monasterolo, N. Glas, Sabine Kunesch\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3659459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Investments are largely allocated to sectors of economic activities that are at odds with the climate targets, thus exposing countries’ economies and investors’ portfolios to the risk of carbon stranded assets. In this context, a main knowledge gap is represented by the poor understanding of financial actors’ perception of the climate-related financial risks and opportunities in the transition to a low-carbon economy, and of the barriers and enablers to manage climate-related financial risks in investors’ portfolios. We contribute to fill this knowledge gap by developing and applying a transdisciplinary approach to knowledge co-production engaging climate finance stakeholders (from public and private financial institutions, policy making, civil society and academia) in surveys, focus groups and dedicated workshops around main aspects of the climate finance debate, with a focus on Austria. Results show that climate-related financial risk understanding and perception are largely heterogeneous across financial actors. Lack of stable climate policies and regulations, of standardized sustainability scores of financial contracts, and of financial risk pricing tools represent main barriers to mainstream climate considerations in portfolios’ risk management. In contrast, role of disclosure, of policy coherence and social engagement contributes to overcome such barriers decreasing market uncertainty. These results are relevant for the implementation of the Austrian and European sustainable finance policy agenda, and for current debate on the alignment of COVID-19 recovery policies with the EU Green Deal agenda.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets Regulation (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets Regulation (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3659459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets Regulation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3659459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

投资主要分配给与气候目标不符的经济活动部门,从而使各国经济和投资者的投资组合面临碳搁浅资产的风险。在此背景下,一个主要的知识缺口体现在金融行为体对低碳经济转型中气候相关金融风险和机遇的认知不足,以及对投资者投资组合中管理气候相关金融风险的障碍和推动因素的理解不足。我们通过开发和应用跨学科的知识合作生产方法,让气候融资利益相关者(来自公共和私营金融机构、政策制定者、民间社会和学术界)参与围绕气候融资辩论主要方面的调查、焦点小组和专门研讨会,并以奥地利为重点,为填补这一知识空白做出了贡献。研究结果表明,金融行为者对气候相关金融风险的理解和感知在很大程度上存在差异。缺乏稳定的气候政策和法规、金融合同的标准化可持续性评分以及金融风险定价工具是将气候因素纳入投资组合风险管理主流的主要障碍。相比之下,信息披露、政策一致性和社会参与的作用有助于克服这些障碍,减少市场不确定性。这些结果与奥地利和欧洲可持续金融政策议程的实施以及当前关于COVID-19复苏政策与欧盟绿色协议议程一致性的辩论相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Climate Sentiments in the Financial Sector: How Financial Markets, Policies and Regulations Generate Barriers and Opportunities to Align Portfolios to Sustainability
Investments are largely allocated to sectors of economic activities that are at odds with the climate targets, thus exposing countries’ economies and investors’ portfolios to the risk of carbon stranded assets. In this context, a main knowledge gap is represented by the poor understanding of financial actors’ perception of the climate-related financial risks and opportunities in the transition to a low-carbon economy, and of the barriers and enablers to manage climate-related financial risks in investors’ portfolios. We contribute to fill this knowledge gap by developing and applying a transdisciplinary approach to knowledge co-production engaging climate finance stakeholders (from public and private financial institutions, policy making, civil society and academia) in surveys, focus groups and dedicated workshops around main aspects of the climate finance debate, with a focus on Austria. Results show that climate-related financial risk understanding and perception are largely heterogeneous across financial actors. Lack of stable climate policies and regulations, of standardized sustainability scores of financial contracts, and of financial risk pricing tools represent main barriers to mainstream climate considerations in portfolios’ risk management. In contrast, role of disclosure, of policy coherence and social engagement contributes to overcome such barriers decreasing market uncertainty. These results are relevant for the implementation of the Austrian and European sustainable finance policy agenda, and for current debate on the alignment of COVID-19 recovery policies with the EU Green Deal agenda.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信