遏制炒作

Kavita Agarwal, Bhushan Jain, Donald E. Porter
{"title":"遏制炒作","authors":"Kavita Agarwal, Bhushan Jain, Donald E. Porter","doi":"10.1145/2797022.2797029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Containers, or OS-based virtualization, have seen a recent resurgence in deployment. The term \"container\" is nearly synonymous with \"lightweight virtualization\", despite a remarkable dearth of careful measurements supporting this notion. This paper contributes comparative measurements and analysis of both containers and hardware virtual machines where the functionality of both technologies intersects. This paper focuses on two important issues for cloud computing: density (guests per physical host) and start-up latency (for responding to load spikes). We conclude that the overall density is highly dependent on the most demanded resource. In many dimensions there are no significant differences, and in other dimensions VMs have significantly higher overheads. A particular contribution is the first detailed analysis of the biggest difference---memory footprint---and opportunities to significantly reduce this overhead.","PeriodicalId":125617,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Workshop on Systems","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Containing the Hype\",\"authors\":\"Kavita Agarwal, Bhushan Jain, Donald E. Porter\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2797022.2797029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Containers, or OS-based virtualization, have seen a recent resurgence in deployment. The term \\\"container\\\" is nearly synonymous with \\\"lightweight virtualization\\\", despite a remarkable dearth of careful measurements supporting this notion. This paper contributes comparative measurements and analysis of both containers and hardware virtual machines where the functionality of both technologies intersects. This paper focuses on two important issues for cloud computing: density (guests per physical host) and start-up latency (for responding to load spikes). We conclude that the overall density is highly dependent on the most demanded resource. In many dimensions there are no significant differences, and in other dimensions VMs have significantly higher overheads. A particular contribution is the first detailed analysis of the biggest difference---memory footprint---and opportunities to significantly reduce this overhead.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Workshop on Systems\",\"volume\":\"216 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Workshop on Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2797022.2797029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Workshop on Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2797022.2797029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

容器,或基于操作系统的虚拟化,最近在部署中重新兴起。术语“容器”几乎等同于“轻量级虚拟化”,尽管非常缺乏支持这一概念的仔细度量。本文提供了容器和硬件虚拟机的比较测量和分析,其中两种技术的功能交叉。本文关注云计算的两个重要问题:密度(每个物理主机上的客户机)和启动延迟(用于响应负载峰值)。我们得出的结论是,总体密度高度依赖于最需要的资源。在许多维度上没有显著差异,而在其他维度上vm的开销明显更高。一个特别的贡献是第一次详细分析了最大的差异——内存占用——以及显著减少这种开销的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Containing the Hype
Containers, or OS-based virtualization, have seen a recent resurgence in deployment. The term "container" is nearly synonymous with "lightweight virtualization", despite a remarkable dearth of careful measurements supporting this notion. This paper contributes comparative measurements and analysis of both containers and hardware virtual machines where the functionality of both technologies intersects. This paper focuses on two important issues for cloud computing: density (guests per physical host) and start-up latency (for responding to load spikes). We conclude that the overall density is highly dependent on the most demanded resource. In many dimensions there are no significant differences, and in other dimensions VMs have significantly higher overheads. A particular contribution is the first detailed analysis of the biggest difference---memory footprint---and opportunities to significantly reduce this overhead.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信