设计恢复工具的比较框架

Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'06) Pub Date : 2006-03-22 DOI:10.1109/CSMR.2006.1

Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc, K. Mens, Roel Wuyts

{"title":"设计恢复工具的比较框架","authors":"Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc, K. Mens, Roel Wuyts","doi":"10.1109/CSMR.2006.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While many commercial and academic design recovery tools have been proposed over the years, assessing their relevance and comparing them is difficult due to the lack of a well-defined, comprehensive, and common framework. In this paper, we introduce such a common comparative framework. The framework builds upon our own experience and extends existing comparative frameworks. We illustrate the comparative framework on two specific design recovery tools","PeriodicalId":443362,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'06)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative framework for design recovery tools\",\"authors\":\"Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc, K. Mens, Roel Wuyts\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSMR.2006.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While many commercial and academic design recovery tools have been proposed over the years, assessing their relevance and comparing them is difficult due to the lack of a well-defined, comprehensive, and common framework. In this paper, we introduce such a common comparative framework. The framework builds upon our own experience and extends existing comparative frameworks. We illustrate the comparative framework on two specific design recovery tools\",\"PeriodicalId\":443362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'06)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2006.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2006.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 37

摘要

虽然多年来已经提出了许多商业和学术设计恢复工具，但由于缺乏一个定义良好、全面和通用的框架，评估它们的相关性和比较它们是困难的。在本文中，我们介绍了这样一个常见的比较框架。该框架建立在我们自己的经验之上，并扩展了现有的比较框架。我们举例说明了两个具体的设计恢复工具的比较框架

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A comparative framework for design recovery tools

While many commercial and academic design recovery tools have been proposed over the years, assessing their relevance and comparing them is difficult due to the lack of a well-defined, comprehensive, and common framework. In this paper, we introduce such a common comparative framework. The framework builds upon our own experience and extends existing comparative frameworks. We illustrate the comparative framework on two specific design recovery tools

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'06)

自引率

0.00%

发文量