道德经济学中技术水平的测度

Zsófia Hajnal
{"title":"道德经济学中技术水平的测度","authors":"Zsófia Hajnal","doi":"10.30958/ajte.9-4-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This theory-based paper attempts classifying and combining methods of orthodox and heterodox economics regarding the measurement of technology levels. The importance of measuring the level of technology is illustrated by technology being a key factor in several neoclassical models. However, just as for the concept of utility, traditional economics treats the level of technology as an abstract scientific construct, without attempts for an absolute quantification. This paper argues that through a systematic classification and various methods, starting- and end points, milestones and even units can be determined. Through surveying the literature, the paper identifies the existing options of measurement, and their shortcomings. Technology is looked at as a “stock”, as opposed to the overrepresented “flow” nature. This gives space for the methods of constructing an absolute scale, and for the unique concept of the “steady-state technology”. Distinctions are made between demand-side and supply-side measurement, as well as between historical and geometrical methods of constructing scales. The methods are illustrated, though not fully implemented, due to limitations in scale and scope. Finally, the paper shows how heterodox economic branches, such as the newly emerging moral economic school, allow for the demand-side measurement to a greater extent, given the adjusted economic axioms. Keywords: technology, demand side, historical method, geometrical method, moral economics","PeriodicalId":197899,"journal":{"name":"Athens Journal of Τechnology & Engineering","volume":"239 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the Level of Technology in Moral Economics\",\"authors\":\"Zsófia Hajnal\",\"doi\":\"10.30958/ajte.9-4-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This theory-based paper attempts classifying and combining methods of orthodox and heterodox economics regarding the measurement of technology levels. The importance of measuring the level of technology is illustrated by technology being a key factor in several neoclassical models. However, just as for the concept of utility, traditional economics treats the level of technology as an abstract scientific construct, without attempts for an absolute quantification. This paper argues that through a systematic classification and various methods, starting- and end points, milestones and even units can be determined. Through surveying the literature, the paper identifies the existing options of measurement, and their shortcomings. Technology is looked at as a “stock”, as opposed to the overrepresented “flow” nature. This gives space for the methods of constructing an absolute scale, and for the unique concept of the “steady-state technology”. Distinctions are made between demand-side and supply-side measurement, as well as between historical and geometrical methods of constructing scales. The methods are illustrated, though not fully implemented, due to limitations in scale and scope. Finally, the paper shows how heterodox economic branches, such as the newly emerging moral economic school, allow for the demand-side measurement to a greater extent, given the adjusted economic axioms. Keywords: technology, demand side, historical method, geometrical method, moral economics\",\"PeriodicalId\":197899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Athens Journal of Τechnology & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"239 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Athens Journal of Τechnology & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajte.9-4-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athens Journal of Τechnology & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajte.9-4-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文以理论为基础,试图对技术水平测度的正统经济学和非正统经济学方法进行分类和结合。在几个新古典主义模型中,技术是一个关键因素,这说明了衡量技术水平的重要性。然而,就像效用的概念一样,传统经济学将技术水平视为一种抽象的科学结构,没有试图对其进行绝对的量化。本文认为,通过系统的分类和各种方法,可以确定起点和终点,里程碑甚至单位。通过对文献的调查,本文确定了现有的测量方法,以及它们的不足之处。技术被视为一种“股票”,而不是被过度代表的“流动”性质。这为构建绝对尺度的方法和“稳态技术”的独特概念提供了空间。需求侧和供给侧测量之间的区别,以及构建尺度的历史和几何方法之间的区别。由于在规模和范围上的限制,这些方法虽然没有完全实现,但仍作了说明。最后,本文展示了在调整后的经济公理下,非正统经济学分支,如新兴的道德经济学派,如何在更大程度上允许需求侧计量。关键词:技术,需求侧,历史方法,几何方法,道德经济学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring the Level of Technology in Moral Economics
This theory-based paper attempts classifying and combining methods of orthodox and heterodox economics regarding the measurement of technology levels. The importance of measuring the level of technology is illustrated by technology being a key factor in several neoclassical models. However, just as for the concept of utility, traditional economics treats the level of technology as an abstract scientific construct, without attempts for an absolute quantification. This paper argues that through a systematic classification and various methods, starting- and end points, milestones and even units can be determined. Through surveying the literature, the paper identifies the existing options of measurement, and their shortcomings. Technology is looked at as a “stock”, as opposed to the overrepresented “flow” nature. This gives space for the methods of constructing an absolute scale, and for the unique concept of the “steady-state technology”. Distinctions are made between demand-side and supply-side measurement, as well as between historical and geometrical methods of constructing scales. The methods are illustrated, though not fully implemented, due to limitations in scale and scope. Finally, the paper shows how heterodox economic branches, such as the newly emerging moral economic school, allow for the demand-side measurement to a greater extent, given the adjusted economic axioms. Keywords: technology, demand side, historical method, geometrical method, moral economics
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信