自动运输系统安全关键保护的软件设计标准

G. S. Krut
{"title":"自动运输系统安全关键保护的软件设计标准","authors":"G. S. Krut","doi":"10.1109/RRCON.1990.171657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the microcomputer replaced discrete logic in safety-critical applications, it became necessary to reexamine the methodologies used to analyze, design, and test such products. From the new methodologies established, fifteen software design rules have been created to ensure the safety of automated transit systems. It is shown that the fifteen software design rules along with a top-down structured and systematic design approach provide the software engineer with the tools and techniques to ensure against: (1) an omission or misapprehension of a safety-related requirement: (2) mistakes in the interpretation or the coding of a safety-related task: and (3) miscommunication or imperfect definition of the design objectives among those responsible for the certification of a design.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":115410,"journal":{"name":"ASME/IEEE Joint Conference on Railroads","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software design criteria for the safety-critical protection of automated transit systems\",\"authors\":\"G. S. Krut\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RRCON.1990.171657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the microcomputer replaced discrete logic in safety-critical applications, it became necessary to reexamine the methodologies used to analyze, design, and test such products. From the new methodologies established, fifteen software design rules have been created to ensure the safety of automated transit systems. It is shown that the fifteen software design rules along with a top-down structured and systematic design approach provide the software engineer with the tools and techniques to ensure against: (1) an omission or misapprehension of a safety-related requirement: (2) mistakes in the interpretation or the coding of a safety-related task: and (3) miscommunication or imperfect definition of the design objectives among those responsible for the certification of a design.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":115410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASME/IEEE Joint Conference on Railroads\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASME/IEEE Joint Conference on Railroads\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RRCON.1990.171657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME/IEEE Joint Conference on Railroads","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RRCON.1990.171657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于微型计算机在安全关键应用中取代了离散逻辑,因此有必要重新审查用于分析、设计和测试此类产品的方法。根据新建立的方法,已经创建了15个软件设计规则,以确保自动运输系统的安全。本文表明,这15条软件设计规则以及自上而下的结构化和系统化的设计方法为软件工程师提供了工具和技术,以确保防止:(1)对安全相关要求的遗漏或误解;(2)对安全相关任务的解释或编码中的错误;(3)在负责设计认证的人员之间对设计目标的误解或不完善定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Software design criteria for the safety-critical protection of automated transit systems
As the microcomputer replaced discrete logic in safety-critical applications, it became necessary to reexamine the methodologies used to analyze, design, and test such products. From the new methodologies established, fifteen software design rules have been created to ensure the safety of automated transit systems. It is shown that the fifteen software design rules along with a top-down structured and systematic design approach provide the software engineer with the tools and techniques to ensure against: (1) an omission or misapprehension of a safety-related requirement: (2) mistakes in the interpretation or the coding of a safety-related task: and (3) miscommunication or imperfect definition of the design objectives among those responsible for the certification of a design.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信