阿拉伯语主格和宾格体验者的语义

Hanan A. Ebaid
{"title":"阿拉伯语主格和宾格体验者的语义","authors":"Hanan A. Ebaid","doi":"10.21608/ejlt.2015.224640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper is concerned with highlighting the importance and significance of the semantic-syntactic interface for the expression and interpretation of linguistic structures. This interface is represented by the correlation of role archetypes like agent, patient and experiencer and grammatical relations like subject and direct object. This study is conducted within the framework of Langacker’s model of cognitive grammar theory which asserts the indispensability of this interface for any satisfactory analysis of linguistic constructions. This functional approach is intended to be reactionary to formal approaches which advocate the autonomy of syntax from semantics. Thus in formal theories, some syntactic issues like grammatical relations are identified and characterised with no reference to semantic considerations. By contrast, cognitive grammar regards grammatical relations and syntactic aspects like case markers as notionally grounded. Thus their identity and description follow the cognitive psychology principle of figure/ground organization. Thus the subject usually corresponds to an entity that is the focus of attention or the most important participant in a certain structure while the direct object specifies a less prominent participant. This is due to the fact that the direct object usually represents an entity that is affected by the entity specified by the subject. A second objective of this study is to emphasize the crucial and pivotal role of construal for the semantic and syntactic structure of linguistic expressions. Construal simply means the expression of a situation in alternate ways for specific purposes. The use of this principle results in the choice of some elements or entities of a situation as more salient than others. These salient entities are assigned specific role archetypes and grammatical relations that are conformed to the construal of a situation. Thus in We find that the experiencer role, specified by the NP Ahmed in both sentences, receives the nominative case marking in 1 and the accusative in 2. It is also noticed that the semantic features of the verbs in 1 and 2 are dissimilar. This is ascribed to the fact that the conceptual organization of the elements in each situation determines the syntactic aspects in linguistic constructions such as case endings and verb form. The Experiencer role has been selected as it represents a wide range of human conceptual, emotional and perceptual interactions.","PeriodicalId":289825,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Linguistics and Translation","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Semantics of the Nominative and the Accusative Experiencer in Arabic\",\"authors\":\"Hanan A. Ebaid\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejlt.2015.224640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present paper is concerned with highlighting the importance and significance of the semantic-syntactic interface for the expression and interpretation of linguistic structures. This interface is represented by the correlation of role archetypes like agent, patient and experiencer and grammatical relations like subject and direct object. This study is conducted within the framework of Langacker’s model of cognitive grammar theory which asserts the indispensability of this interface for any satisfactory analysis of linguistic constructions. This functional approach is intended to be reactionary to formal approaches which advocate the autonomy of syntax from semantics. Thus in formal theories, some syntactic issues like grammatical relations are identified and characterised with no reference to semantic considerations. By contrast, cognitive grammar regards grammatical relations and syntactic aspects like case markers as notionally grounded. Thus their identity and description follow the cognitive psychology principle of figure/ground organization. Thus the subject usually corresponds to an entity that is the focus of attention or the most important participant in a certain structure while the direct object specifies a less prominent participant. This is due to the fact that the direct object usually represents an entity that is affected by the entity specified by the subject. A second objective of this study is to emphasize the crucial and pivotal role of construal for the semantic and syntactic structure of linguistic expressions. Construal simply means the expression of a situation in alternate ways for specific purposes. The use of this principle results in the choice of some elements or entities of a situation as more salient than others. These salient entities are assigned specific role archetypes and grammatical relations that are conformed to the construal of a situation. Thus in We find that the experiencer role, specified by the NP Ahmed in both sentences, receives the nominative case marking in 1 and the accusative in 2. It is also noticed that the semantic features of the verbs in 1 and 2 are dissimilar. This is ascribed to the fact that the conceptual organization of the elements in each situation determines the syntactic aspects in linguistic constructions such as case endings and verb form. The Experiencer role has been selected as it represents a wide range of human conceptual, emotional and perceptual interactions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Linguistics and Translation\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Linguistics and Translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejlt.2015.224640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Linguistics and Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejlt.2015.224640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文着重强调语义-句法界面对于语言结构的表达和解释的重要性和意义。这个界面由施者、受者、体验者等角色原型的关联和主语、直接宾语等语法关系来表示。本研究是在Langacker的认知语法理论模型的框架内进行的,该模型断言这种界面对于任何令人满意的语言结构分析都是不可或缺的。这种函数式方法旨在与提倡语法独立于语义的形式化方法相对立。因此,在形式理论中,一些语法问题,如语法关系,是在不考虑语义的情况下识别和表征的。相比之下,认知语法将语法关系和句法方面,如格标记,视为概念基础。因此,它们的身份和描述遵循图/地组织的认知心理学原则。因此,主语通常对应于某个结构中关注的焦点或最重要的参与者,而直接宾语则指定不太突出的参与者。这是因为直接宾语通常代表一个受主语所指定的实体影响的实体。本研究的第二个目的是强调解释对语言表达的语义和句法结构的关键作用。解释仅仅意味着为了特定的目的,以不同的方式表达一种情况。使用这一原则会导致选择情境中的某些元素或实体比其他元素或实体更突出。这些显著的实体被赋予特定的角色原型和符合情境解释的语法关系。因此,我们发现两个句子中由NP Ahmed指定的经验者角色在1中接受主格标记,在2中接受宾格标记。我们还注意到1和2中动词的语义特征是不同的。这是由于每种情况下元素的概念组织决定了语言结构中的句法方面,如格尾和动词形式。选择体验者角色是因为它代表了广泛的人类概念、情感和感知互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Semantics of the Nominative and the Accusative Experiencer in Arabic
The present paper is concerned with highlighting the importance and significance of the semantic-syntactic interface for the expression and interpretation of linguistic structures. This interface is represented by the correlation of role archetypes like agent, patient and experiencer and grammatical relations like subject and direct object. This study is conducted within the framework of Langacker’s model of cognitive grammar theory which asserts the indispensability of this interface for any satisfactory analysis of linguistic constructions. This functional approach is intended to be reactionary to formal approaches which advocate the autonomy of syntax from semantics. Thus in formal theories, some syntactic issues like grammatical relations are identified and characterised with no reference to semantic considerations. By contrast, cognitive grammar regards grammatical relations and syntactic aspects like case markers as notionally grounded. Thus their identity and description follow the cognitive psychology principle of figure/ground organization. Thus the subject usually corresponds to an entity that is the focus of attention or the most important participant in a certain structure while the direct object specifies a less prominent participant. This is due to the fact that the direct object usually represents an entity that is affected by the entity specified by the subject. A second objective of this study is to emphasize the crucial and pivotal role of construal for the semantic and syntactic structure of linguistic expressions. Construal simply means the expression of a situation in alternate ways for specific purposes. The use of this principle results in the choice of some elements or entities of a situation as more salient than others. These salient entities are assigned specific role archetypes and grammatical relations that are conformed to the construal of a situation. Thus in We find that the experiencer role, specified by the NP Ahmed in both sentences, receives the nominative case marking in 1 and the accusative in 2. It is also noticed that the semantic features of the verbs in 1 and 2 are dissimilar. This is ascribed to the fact that the conceptual organization of the elements in each situation determines the syntactic aspects in linguistic constructions such as case endings and verb form. The Experiencer role has been selected as it represents a wide range of human conceptual, emotional and perceptual interactions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信