钬激光前列腺去核术治疗既往良性前列腺增生患者的疗效

Kyung Young Moon, Dae-young Kim, J. Yoon, W. Na, Jong Bouk Lee
{"title":"钬激光前列腺去核术治疗既往良性前列腺增生患者的疗效","authors":"Kyung Young Moon, Dae-young Kim, J. Yoon, W. Na, Jong Bouk Lee","doi":"10.4235/JKGS.2014.18.4.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To assess the functional outcomes and morbidity in patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with and without previous transurethral prostate surgery. Methods: Patients were stratified into two groups, 558 patients who underwent primary HoLEP (group I) and 50 patients who underwent ‘secondary-HoLEP’ with prior transurethral prostate surgery (group II). Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative parameters (median age, International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS], prostate-specific antigen [PSA], prostate volume, maximum urinary flow rate [Qmax], and postvoid residual urine volume [PVR]). No significant intraoperative differences were noted in the use of total energy, resected volume, enucleation time, resection efficiency, and mean catheterization time. There were significant improvements in Qmax, PVR, and IPSS in both groups. Complications in groups I and II included 19 (3.1%) and 1 (2.0%) bladder injuries, 25 (4.4%) and 2 (4.0%) recatheterization for transient voiding difficulty, 20 (3.5%) and 2 (4%) cases of severe hematuria requiring additional treatment, and 5 (0.8%) and 0 cases for remorcellation due to remaining adenoma. Transient incontinence was the most common complication for both groups I and II, 30 cases (5.4%) and 3 cases (6.0%) respectively. Urinary tract infection showed improvement subsequent to antibiotic treatment. During the 6 month follow-up period, urethral stricture occurred in 7 cases (1.3%) for group I and in 1 case (2.0%) for group II. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in functional outcomes and morbidity between the two groups. ‘Secondary-HoLEP’ seems to be effective and safe for patients with prior BPH surgery.","PeriodicalId":191447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Geriatrics Society","volume":"55 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of the Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Patients With Prior Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Kyung Young Moon, Dae-young Kim, J. Yoon, W. Na, Jong Bouk Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.4235/JKGS.2014.18.4.199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: To assess the functional outcomes and morbidity in patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with and without previous transurethral prostate surgery. Methods: Patients were stratified into two groups, 558 patients who underwent primary HoLEP (group I) and 50 patients who underwent ‘secondary-HoLEP’ with prior transurethral prostate surgery (group II). Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative parameters (median age, International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS], prostate-specific antigen [PSA], prostate volume, maximum urinary flow rate [Qmax], and postvoid residual urine volume [PVR]). No significant intraoperative differences were noted in the use of total energy, resected volume, enucleation time, resection efficiency, and mean catheterization time. There were significant improvements in Qmax, PVR, and IPSS in both groups. Complications in groups I and II included 19 (3.1%) and 1 (2.0%) bladder injuries, 25 (4.4%) and 2 (4.0%) recatheterization for transient voiding difficulty, 20 (3.5%) and 2 (4%) cases of severe hematuria requiring additional treatment, and 5 (0.8%) and 0 cases for remorcellation due to remaining adenoma. Transient incontinence was the most common complication for both groups I and II, 30 cases (5.4%) and 3 cases (6.0%) respectively. Urinary tract infection showed improvement subsequent to antibiotic treatment. During the 6 month follow-up period, urethral stricture occurred in 7 cases (1.3%) for group I and in 1 case (2.0%) for group II. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in functional outcomes and morbidity between the two groups. ‘Secondary-HoLEP’ seems to be effective and safe for patients with prior BPH surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Korean Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"55 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Korean Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4235/JKGS.2014.18.4.199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/JKGS.2014.18.4.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:评估钬激光前列腺摘除(HoLEP)患者的功能结局和发病率,这些患者既往有或没有经尿道前列腺手术。方法:将患者分为两组,558例原发性HoLEP患者(I组)和50例既往经尿道前列腺手术的“继发性HoLEP”患者(II组)。结果:术前参数(年龄中位数、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、前列腺体积、最大尿流率(Qmax)、空后残余尿量(PVR))无显著差异。术中总能量、切除体积、去核时间、切除效率和平均置管时间的使用差异无统计学意义。两组患者的Qmax、PVR和IPSS均有显著改善。I组和II组的并发症包括膀胱损伤19例(3.1%)和1例(2.0%),暂时性排尿困难再置管25例(4.4%)和2例(4.0%),需要额外治疗的严重血尿20例(3.5%)和2例(4%),残留腺瘤导致再尿5例(0.8%)和0例。一过性尿失禁是I组和II组最常见的并发症,分别为30例(5.4%)和3例(6.0%)。抗生素治疗后尿路感染有所改善。随访6个月,1组发生尿道狭窄7例(1.3%),2组1例(2.0%)。结论:两组患者的功能结局和发病率无显著差异。对于既往有前列腺增生手术的患者,“二次holep”似乎是有效和安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of the Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Patients With Prior Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery
Background: To assess the functional outcomes and morbidity in patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with and without previous transurethral prostate surgery. Methods: Patients were stratified into two groups, 558 patients who underwent primary HoLEP (group I) and 50 patients who underwent ‘secondary-HoLEP’ with prior transurethral prostate surgery (group II). Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative parameters (median age, International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS], prostate-specific antigen [PSA], prostate volume, maximum urinary flow rate [Qmax], and postvoid residual urine volume [PVR]). No significant intraoperative differences were noted in the use of total energy, resected volume, enucleation time, resection efficiency, and mean catheterization time. There were significant improvements in Qmax, PVR, and IPSS in both groups. Complications in groups I and II included 19 (3.1%) and 1 (2.0%) bladder injuries, 25 (4.4%) and 2 (4.0%) recatheterization for transient voiding difficulty, 20 (3.5%) and 2 (4%) cases of severe hematuria requiring additional treatment, and 5 (0.8%) and 0 cases for remorcellation due to remaining adenoma. Transient incontinence was the most common complication for both groups I and II, 30 cases (5.4%) and 3 cases (6.0%) respectively. Urinary tract infection showed improvement subsequent to antibiotic treatment. During the 6 month follow-up period, urethral stricture occurred in 7 cases (1.3%) for group I and in 1 case (2.0%) for group II. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in functional outcomes and morbidity between the two groups. ‘Secondary-HoLEP’ seems to be effective and safe for patients with prior BPH surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信