{"title":"面向MANET的地播路由协议性能比较","authors":"Pei-Chun Yao, Edward Krohne, T. Camp","doi":"10.1109/ICCCN.2004.1401631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work classifies the current geocast routing protocols of a mobile ad hoc network (MANET) into three categories. We then simulate a typical geocast routing protocol in each category. We performed four studies designed to highlight the various strengths and weaknesses of the protocols: node density, traffic/congestion, mobility, and a combination study examining all three parameters together.","PeriodicalId":229045,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX969)","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of geocast routing protocols for a MANET\",\"authors\":\"Pei-Chun Yao, Edward Krohne, T. Camp\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCCN.2004.1401631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work classifies the current geocast routing protocols of a mobile ad hoc network (MANET) into three categories. We then simulate a typical geocast routing protocol in each category. We performed four studies designed to highlight the various strengths and weaknesses of the protocols: node density, traffic/congestion, mobility, and a combination study examining all three parameters together.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX969)\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX969)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2004.1401631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX969)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2004.1401631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance comparison of geocast routing protocols for a MANET
This work classifies the current geocast routing protocols of a mobile ad hoc network (MANET) into three categories. We then simulate a typical geocast routing protocol in each category. We performed four studies designed to highlight the various strengths and weaknesses of the protocols: node density, traffic/congestion, mobility, and a combination study examining all three parameters together.