M. Haque, M. Gratson, Jodi Woerle, Fitz Tavernier Jr
{"title":"开始了解Andexxa的成本效益","authors":"M. Haque, M. Gratson, Jodi Woerle, Fitz Tavernier Jr","doi":"10.52504/001c.7777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"**Introduction:** Tens of thousands of patients die of major life-threatening bleeds every year while taking direct factor Xa inhibitors, a class of anticoagulant medications that until now had no reversal agent. In May 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration approved andexanet alfa (Andexxa), the first known reversal agent for a subset of direct factor Xa inhibitors. It has been reported to substantially reduce mortality rates for patients who experience a major bleed while taking rivaroxaban or apixaban. Andexxa is costly, however, ranging between US $24,750 and $49,500 for treatment. \n**Methods:** To explore the cost-effectiveness of Andexxa, a Markov model was generated using existing Andexxa trial data and related literature. Multiple 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses were also constructed to delineate the impact Andexxa would need to have on mortality rates and health-related quality of life to meet the willingness-to-pay thresholds ranging between $50,000 and $150,000. The model included a hypothetical cohort of patients aged 65 years at an increased risk of stroke due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and with no contraindication to anticoagulation. \n**Results:** The Markov model showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Andexxa over the standard of care is $211,056 for an intracranial hemorrhage and $40,718 for a gastrointestinal bleed. Sensitivity analyses further indicated that while Andexxa may be cost-effective to treat gastrointestinal bleeds, medication trial data will likely need to show significant impact on a patient’s quality of life and relative risk of death following an intracranial bleed to be cost-effective. \n**Discussion:** Although the application of these findings is restricted due to limited trial data, beginning to understand the cost-effectiveness of Andexxa provides policymakers important insight into the economic value of the intervention.","PeriodicalId":340325,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown Medical Review","volume":"48 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beginning to Understand the Cost-effectiveness of Andexxa\",\"authors\":\"M. Haque, M. Gratson, Jodi Woerle, Fitz Tavernier Jr\",\"doi\":\"10.52504/001c.7777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"**Introduction:** Tens of thousands of patients die of major life-threatening bleeds every year while taking direct factor Xa inhibitors, a class of anticoagulant medications that until now had no reversal agent. In May 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration approved andexanet alfa (Andexxa), the first known reversal agent for a subset of direct factor Xa inhibitors. It has been reported to substantially reduce mortality rates for patients who experience a major bleed while taking rivaroxaban or apixaban. Andexxa is costly, however, ranging between US $24,750 and $49,500 for treatment. \\n**Methods:** To explore the cost-effectiveness of Andexxa, a Markov model was generated using existing Andexxa trial data and related literature. Multiple 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses were also constructed to delineate the impact Andexxa would need to have on mortality rates and health-related quality of life to meet the willingness-to-pay thresholds ranging between $50,000 and $150,000. The model included a hypothetical cohort of patients aged 65 years at an increased risk of stroke due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and with no contraindication to anticoagulation. \\n**Results:** The Markov model showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Andexxa over the standard of care is $211,056 for an intracranial hemorrhage and $40,718 for a gastrointestinal bleed. Sensitivity analyses further indicated that while Andexxa may be cost-effective to treat gastrointestinal bleeds, medication trial data will likely need to show significant impact on a patient’s quality of life and relative risk of death following an intracranial bleed to be cost-effective. \\n**Discussion:** Although the application of these findings is restricted due to limited trial data, beginning to understand the cost-effectiveness of Andexxa provides policymakers important insight into the economic value of the intervention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgetown Medical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgetown Medical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52504/001c.7777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown Medical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52504/001c.7777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beginning to Understand the Cost-effectiveness of Andexxa
**Introduction:** Tens of thousands of patients die of major life-threatening bleeds every year while taking direct factor Xa inhibitors, a class of anticoagulant medications that until now had no reversal agent. In May 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration approved andexanet alfa (Andexxa), the first known reversal agent for a subset of direct factor Xa inhibitors. It has been reported to substantially reduce mortality rates for patients who experience a major bleed while taking rivaroxaban or apixaban. Andexxa is costly, however, ranging between US $24,750 and $49,500 for treatment.
**Methods:** To explore the cost-effectiveness of Andexxa, a Markov model was generated using existing Andexxa trial data and related literature. Multiple 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses were also constructed to delineate the impact Andexxa would need to have on mortality rates and health-related quality of life to meet the willingness-to-pay thresholds ranging between $50,000 and $150,000. The model included a hypothetical cohort of patients aged 65 years at an increased risk of stroke due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and with no contraindication to anticoagulation.
**Results:** The Markov model showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Andexxa over the standard of care is $211,056 for an intracranial hemorrhage and $40,718 for a gastrointestinal bleed. Sensitivity analyses further indicated that while Andexxa may be cost-effective to treat gastrointestinal bleeds, medication trial data will likely need to show significant impact on a patient’s quality of life and relative risk of death following an intracranial bleed to be cost-effective.
**Discussion:** Although the application of these findings is restricted due to limited trial data, beginning to understand the cost-effectiveness of Andexxa provides policymakers important insight into the economic value of the intervention.