不同剂量右美托咪定对经皮冠状动脉介入患者心肌保护作用的比较

Tanveer Singh Kundra, P. S. Nagaraja, Parminder Kaur
{"title":"不同剂量右美托咪定对经皮冠状动脉介入患者心肌保护作用的比较","authors":"Tanveer Singh Kundra, P. S. Nagaraja, Parminder Kaur","doi":"10.33590/emjcardiol/10311345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Dexmedetomidine has been shown to have a myocardial protective effect in off-pump coronary artery bypass patients. However, the same dosage of dexmedetomidine could not elicit a myocardial protective effect in percutaneous coronary intervention patients. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine when used for myocardial protection in percutaneous coronary interventional patients.\n\nMethodology: 240 patients (Group D1, treated with dexmedetomidine [n=80]; Group D2, treated with dexmedetomidine [n=80]; and the control group [C; n=80]) were enrolled in the study. Dexmedetomidine was administered over 15 minutes in the respective doses in Groups D1 and D2 at the start of the procedure, while normal saline was given to patients in Group C. Maintenance of dexmedetomidine/NS was started at 0.5 µg/kg/hour in the groups until 30 minutes post-procedure. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and CPK-MB, heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MAP), and sedation score were noted at baseline (T0), 6 hours (T1), 12 hours (T2), and 24 hours (T3) after the loading dose.\n\nResults: MAP and HR significantly decreased in D1 and D2 compared to C (p<0.05). None of the patients in D1 had a reduction in MAP <20% and HR <50 bpm; however, 3 patients in D2 had a clinically significant reduction in MAP, and 5 patients had HR <50 bpm. The patients in D2 were more sedated compared to patients in D1 and C. The difference in CPK and CPK-MB was significant at 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours in D2.\n\nConclusion: Dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg provides myocardial protection compared to 1 µg/kg, but at the cost of a clinically significant decrease in MAP and HR. Patients who received dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg were more sedated compared to patients receiving 1 µg/kg, warranting greater care during and post-procedure.","PeriodicalId":284912,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Cardiology","volume":"29 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine for Myocardial Protection in Percutaneous Coronary Interventional Patients\",\"authors\":\"Tanveer Singh Kundra, P. S. Nagaraja, Parminder Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.33590/emjcardiol/10311345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Dexmedetomidine has been shown to have a myocardial protective effect in off-pump coronary artery bypass patients. However, the same dosage of dexmedetomidine could not elicit a myocardial protective effect in percutaneous coronary intervention patients. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine when used for myocardial protection in percutaneous coronary interventional patients.\\n\\nMethodology: 240 patients (Group D1, treated with dexmedetomidine [n=80]; Group D2, treated with dexmedetomidine [n=80]; and the control group [C; n=80]) were enrolled in the study. Dexmedetomidine was administered over 15 minutes in the respective doses in Groups D1 and D2 at the start of the procedure, while normal saline was given to patients in Group C. Maintenance of dexmedetomidine/NS was started at 0.5 µg/kg/hour in the groups until 30 minutes post-procedure. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and CPK-MB, heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MAP), and sedation score were noted at baseline (T0), 6 hours (T1), 12 hours (T2), and 24 hours (T3) after the loading dose.\\n\\nResults: MAP and HR significantly decreased in D1 and D2 compared to C (p<0.05). None of the patients in D1 had a reduction in MAP <20% and HR <50 bpm; however, 3 patients in D2 had a clinically significant reduction in MAP, and 5 patients had HR <50 bpm. The patients in D2 were more sedated compared to patients in D1 and C. The difference in CPK and CPK-MB was significant at 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours in D2.\\n\\nConclusion: Dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg provides myocardial protection compared to 1 µg/kg, but at the cost of a clinically significant decrease in MAP and HR. Patients who received dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg were more sedated compared to patients receiving 1 µg/kg, warranting greater care during and post-procedure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EMJ Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EMJ Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjcardiol/10311345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjcardiol/10311345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

右美托咪定已被证明对非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术患者有心肌保护作用。然而,相同剂量的右美托咪定不能引起经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的心肌保护作用。本研究的目的是评估不同剂量右美托咪定用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者心肌保护的效果。方法:240例患者(D1组,右美托咪定治疗[n=80];D2组,右美托咪定治疗[n=80];和对照组[C];N =80])被纳入研究。D1组和D2组患者在手术开始时分别给予右美托咪定15分钟,c组患者给予生理盐水,每小时0.5µg/kg维持右美托咪定/NS,直到手术后30分钟。在负荷剂量后的基线(T0)、6小时(T1)、12小时(T2)和24小时(T3)记录肌酸磷酸激酶(CPK)和CPK- mb、心率(HR)、平均血压(MAP)和镇静评分。结果:D1、D2组MAP、HR较C组明显降低(p<0.05)。D1组没有患者MAP降低<20%,HR < 50bpm;然而,3例D2组患者的MAP有临床意义的降低,5例患者的HR < 50bpm。D2患者比D1和c患者镇静程度更高。D2患者在6小时、12小时和24小时的CPK和CPK- mb差异显著。结论:与1µg/kg右美托咪定相比,2µg/kg右美托咪定具有心肌保护作用,但其代价是MAP和HR在临床上显著降低。与接受1 μ g/kg右美托咪定治疗的患者相比,接受2 μ g/kg右美托咪定治疗的患者镇静程度更高,因此在手术期间和术后需要更多的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine for Myocardial Protection in Percutaneous Coronary Interventional Patients
Introduction: Dexmedetomidine has been shown to have a myocardial protective effect in off-pump coronary artery bypass patients. However, the same dosage of dexmedetomidine could not elicit a myocardial protective effect in percutaneous coronary intervention patients. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine when used for myocardial protection in percutaneous coronary interventional patients. Methodology: 240 patients (Group D1, treated with dexmedetomidine [n=80]; Group D2, treated with dexmedetomidine [n=80]; and the control group [C; n=80]) were enrolled in the study. Dexmedetomidine was administered over 15 minutes in the respective doses in Groups D1 and D2 at the start of the procedure, while normal saline was given to patients in Group C. Maintenance of dexmedetomidine/NS was started at 0.5 µg/kg/hour in the groups until 30 minutes post-procedure. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and CPK-MB, heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MAP), and sedation score were noted at baseline (T0), 6 hours (T1), 12 hours (T2), and 24 hours (T3) after the loading dose. Results: MAP and HR significantly decreased in D1 and D2 compared to C (p<0.05). None of the patients in D1 had a reduction in MAP <20% and HR <50 bpm; however, 3 patients in D2 had a clinically significant reduction in MAP, and 5 patients had HR <50 bpm. The patients in D2 were more sedated compared to patients in D1 and C. The difference in CPK and CPK-MB was significant at 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours in D2. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg provides myocardial protection compared to 1 µg/kg, but at the cost of a clinically significant decrease in MAP and HR. Patients who received dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg were more sedated compared to patients receiving 1 µg/kg, warranting greater care during and post-procedure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信