模型预测控制在离散位移缸驱动节臂起重机中的应用

V. Donkov, T. Andersen, H. Pedersen, M. Ebbesen
{"title":"模型预测控制在离散位移缸驱动节臂起重机中的应用","authors":"V. Donkov, T. Andersen, H. Pedersen, M. Ebbesen","doi":"10.1109/GFPS.2018.8472363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, two Discrete Displacement Cylinders (DDCs) are used to drive the boom of a knuckle boom crane. DDCs operate by connecting one of several available pressure levels to each chamber in order to produce different forces. A trade-off exists with such systems, between the accuracy of tracking and energy dissipation due to switching. A popular way to approach this problem is a Force Shifting Algorithm (FSA). However, in this paper, the trade-off is managed by use of a Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm. The tracking accuracy and energy efficiency of the MPC and FSA strategies for DDCs are compared to a PID strategy for standard cylinders. The comparison is obtained by use of a computer simulation of a knuckle boom crane performing a realistic load cycle. The load cycle consists of the crane extending to pick up a load and then retracting to place it at an appropriate location. The main results show that MPC can deliver smoother and more accurate motion than FSA, while using less energy. Compared with standard cylinders and PID control, MPC uses less energy, but due to the switching of chamber pressures, the motion is smoother with the standard strategy. Both FSA and MPC can have degraded performance when a large change in load is introduced.","PeriodicalId":273799,"journal":{"name":"2018 Global Fluid Power Society PhD Symposium (GFPS)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Model Predictive Control in Discrete Displacement Cylinders to Drive a Knuckle Boom Crane\",\"authors\":\"V. Donkov, T. Andersen, H. Pedersen, M. Ebbesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GFPS.2018.8472363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, two Discrete Displacement Cylinders (DDCs) are used to drive the boom of a knuckle boom crane. DDCs operate by connecting one of several available pressure levels to each chamber in order to produce different forces. A trade-off exists with such systems, between the accuracy of tracking and energy dissipation due to switching. A popular way to approach this problem is a Force Shifting Algorithm (FSA). However, in this paper, the trade-off is managed by use of a Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm. The tracking accuracy and energy efficiency of the MPC and FSA strategies for DDCs are compared to a PID strategy for standard cylinders. The comparison is obtained by use of a computer simulation of a knuckle boom crane performing a realistic load cycle. The load cycle consists of the crane extending to pick up a load and then retracting to place it at an appropriate location. The main results show that MPC can deliver smoother and more accurate motion than FSA, while using less energy. Compared with standard cylinders and PID control, MPC uses less energy, but due to the switching of chamber pressures, the motion is smoother with the standard strategy. Both FSA and MPC can have degraded performance when a large change in load is introduced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Global Fluid Power Society PhD Symposium (GFPS)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Global Fluid Power Society PhD Symposium (GFPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GFPS.2018.8472363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Global Fluid Power Society PhD Symposium (GFPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GFPS.2018.8472363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文采用两个离散位移缸(ddc)驱动关节臂式起重机的臂架。ddc通过将几个可用压力级别中的一个连接到每个腔室以产生不同的力来工作。在这种系统中,跟踪的准确性和由于切换引起的能量消耗之间存在权衡。解决这个问题的一种流行方法是力转移算法(FSA)。然而,在本文中,使用模型预测控制(MPC)算法来管理权衡。将ddc的MPC和FSA策略的跟踪精度和能效与标准气缸的PID策略进行了比较。通过对关节臂起重机进行真实载荷循环的计算机模拟,得出了两者的对比。负载周期包括起重机伸出来取负载,然后缩回,将其放置在适当的位置。主要结果表明,MPC比FSA提供更平稳、更精确的运动,同时消耗更少的能量。与标准气缸和PID控制相比,MPC消耗的能量更少,但由于腔室压力的切换,MPC在标准策略下运动更平稳。当负载发生较大变化时,FSA和MPC的性能都会下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Model Predictive Control in Discrete Displacement Cylinders to Drive a Knuckle Boom Crane
In this paper, two Discrete Displacement Cylinders (DDCs) are used to drive the boom of a knuckle boom crane. DDCs operate by connecting one of several available pressure levels to each chamber in order to produce different forces. A trade-off exists with such systems, between the accuracy of tracking and energy dissipation due to switching. A popular way to approach this problem is a Force Shifting Algorithm (FSA). However, in this paper, the trade-off is managed by use of a Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm. The tracking accuracy and energy efficiency of the MPC and FSA strategies for DDCs are compared to a PID strategy for standard cylinders. The comparison is obtained by use of a computer simulation of a knuckle boom crane performing a realistic load cycle. The load cycle consists of the crane extending to pick up a load and then retracting to place it at an appropriate location. The main results show that MPC can deliver smoother and more accurate motion than FSA, while using less energy. Compared with standard cylinders and PID control, MPC uses less energy, but due to the switching of chamber pressures, the motion is smoother with the standard strategy. Both FSA and MPC can have degraded performance when a large change in load is introduced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信