使用OpenDaylight实现SDN控制器:实验

Alexandra Eftimie, E. Borcoci
{"title":"使用OpenDaylight实现SDN控制器:实验","authors":"Alexandra Eftimie, E. Borcoci","doi":"10.1109/COMM48946.2020.9142044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software Defined Networking (SDN) is ment to add flexibility to control-plan implementation choices, allowing one to choose between points on the implementation design axis: centralized to distributed, micro-flow to aggregated-flow, reactive to proactive, virtual to physical, and fully-consistent to eventually-consistent. It should be highlighted that the problem of comparing SDN controllers is an extremely challenging one, mainly because it is a multifaceted problem. Additionally, comparative analysis typically helps in 'selecting' a controller to meet a particular or a set of requirements. This paper aims to present the implementation of one open source controller – OpenDaylight – in a small environment. The experiments described can actually help the implementors to develop SDN oriented systems. Pros and cons with regards to implementation and functionalty will be highlighted.","PeriodicalId":405841,"journal":{"name":"2020 13th International Conference on Communications (COMM)","volume":"85 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SDN controller implementation using OpenDaylight: experiments\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Eftimie, E. Borcoci\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMM48946.2020.9142044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software Defined Networking (SDN) is ment to add flexibility to control-plan implementation choices, allowing one to choose between points on the implementation design axis: centralized to distributed, micro-flow to aggregated-flow, reactive to proactive, virtual to physical, and fully-consistent to eventually-consistent. It should be highlighted that the problem of comparing SDN controllers is an extremely challenging one, mainly because it is a multifaceted problem. Additionally, comparative analysis typically helps in 'selecting' a controller to meet a particular or a set of requirements. This paper aims to present the implementation of one open source controller – OpenDaylight – in a small environment. The experiments described can actually help the implementors to develop SDN oriented systems. Pros and cons with regards to implementation and functionalty will be highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 13th International Conference on Communications (COMM)\",\"volume\":\"85 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 13th International Conference on Communications (COMM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMM48946.2020.9142044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 13th International Conference on Communications (COMM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMM48946.2020.9142044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

软件定义网络(SDN)旨在增加控制计划实现选择的灵活性,允许在实现设计轴上的点之间进行选择:集中式到分布式,微流到聚合流,被动到主动,虚拟到物理,完全一致到最终一致。应该强调的是,比较SDN控制器的问题是一个极具挑战性的问题,主要是因为它是一个多方面的问题。此外,比较分析通常有助于“选择”控制器以满足特定或一组要求。本文的目的是在一个小的环境中实现一个开源控制器——OpenDaylight。所描述的实验实际上可以帮助实现者开发面向SDN的系统。关于实现和功能的优点和缺点将被强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SDN controller implementation using OpenDaylight: experiments
Software Defined Networking (SDN) is ment to add flexibility to control-plan implementation choices, allowing one to choose between points on the implementation design axis: centralized to distributed, micro-flow to aggregated-flow, reactive to proactive, virtual to physical, and fully-consistent to eventually-consistent. It should be highlighted that the problem of comparing SDN controllers is an extremely challenging one, mainly because it is a multifaceted problem. Additionally, comparative analysis typically helps in 'selecting' a controller to meet a particular or a set of requirements. This paper aims to present the implementation of one open source controller – OpenDaylight – in a small environment. The experiments described can actually help the implementors to develop SDN oriented systems. Pros and cons with regards to implementation and functionalty will be highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信