流行儿童动画电影中的性别差异与刻板印象

Sara C. Hare, Courtney Hoke
{"title":"流行儿童动画电影中的性别差异与刻板印象","authors":"Sara C. Hare, Courtney Hoke","doi":"10.15640/ijgws.v7n1a8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This content analysis examines the parity and stereotyping of male and female characters from the 150 topgrossing (North American) children’s animated films from 1980 to 2018. Results showed that the balance of characters was not equal with males filling more of the lead roles (83.3%), title roles (85.5%), speaking roles (73.3%), and membership in the main gang (72.0%). More than half (55.3%) of the films failed the Bechdel Test, although female-led films were more likely to pass than male-led films. Males were more likely to fill the public roles, with significantly more male characters having jobs/occupations than females. In the parenting role, fathers of the lead characters were more likely to be involved than mothers. The findings from the stereotyping questions were mixed with females more likely to be shown with a sexy body. However, males were not more likely to be brave and heroic (in this case by performing rescues) when the ratio of characters was included in the calculations. These results are upsetting because of the extensive amount of time children spend with media and the worldwide impact of Western-produced films. This disproportionate portrayal of society negatively influences a child’s learning and socialization processes.","PeriodicalId":198281,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENDER & WOMEN'S STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Disparity and Stereotypes in Popular Children’s Animated Films\",\"authors\":\"Sara C. Hare, Courtney Hoke\",\"doi\":\"10.15640/ijgws.v7n1a8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This content analysis examines the parity and stereotyping of male and female characters from the 150 topgrossing (North American) children’s animated films from 1980 to 2018. Results showed that the balance of characters was not equal with males filling more of the lead roles (83.3%), title roles (85.5%), speaking roles (73.3%), and membership in the main gang (72.0%). More than half (55.3%) of the films failed the Bechdel Test, although female-led films were more likely to pass than male-led films. Males were more likely to fill the public roles, with significantly more male characters having jobs/occupations than females. In the parenting role, fathers of the lead characters were more likely to be involved than mothers. The findings from the stereotyping questions were mixed with females more likely to be shown with a sexy body. However, males were not more likely to be brave and heroic (in this case by performing rescues) when the ratio of characters was included in the calculations. These results are upsetting because of the extensive amount of time children spend with media and the worldwide impact of Western-produced films. This disproportionate portrayal of society negatively influences a child’s learning and socialization processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENDER & WOMEN'S STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENDER & WOMEN'S STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15640/ijgws.v7n1a8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENDER & WOMEN'S STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15640/ijgws.v7n1a8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本内容分析考察了1980年至2018年北美票房最高的150部儿童动画电影中男女角色的平等和刻板印象。结果显示,角色的比例并不均衡,主要角色(83.3%)、标题角色(85.5%)、说话角色(73.3%)和主要帮派成员(72.0%)的比例均为男性。超过一半(55.3%)的电影没有通过贝克德尔测试,尽管女性主演的电影比男性主演的电影更有可能通过测试。男性更有可能扮演公共角色,男性角色拥有的工作/职业明显多于女性。在养育角色中,主角的父亲比母亲更有可能参与其中。刻板印象问题的结果与女性更有可能被展示出性感的身体相混合。然而,当角色比例被计算在内时,男性并不会表现得更勇敢和英勇(在这种情况下是通过执行救援行动)。这些结果令人不安,因为孩子们花在媒体上的时间很长,而且西方电影在世界范围内的影响很大。这种不成比例的社会形象对儿童的学习和社会化进程产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Disparity and Stereotypes in Popular Children’s Animated Films
This content analysis examines the parity and stereotyping of male and female characters from the 150 topgrossing (North American) children’s animated films from 1980 to 2018. Results showed that the balance of characters was not equal with males filling more of the lead roles (83.3%), title roles (85.5%), speaking roles (73.3%), and membership in the main gang (72.0%). More than half (55.3%) of the films failed the Bechdel Test, although female-led films were more likely to pass than male-led films. Males were more likely to fill the public roles, with significantly more male characters having jobs/occupations than females. In the parenting role, fathers of the lead characters were more likely to be involved than mothers. The findings from the stereotyping questions were mixed with females more likely to be shown with a sexy body. However, males were not more likely to be brave and heroic (in this case by performing rescues) when the ratio of characters was included in the calculations. These results are upsetting because of the extensive amount of time children spend with media and the worldwide impact of Western-produced films. This disproportionate portrayal of society negatively influences a child’s learning and socialization processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信