减轻地质阻挡应用中风险的UDAR技术的演变

Supriya Sinha, Frank Antonsen, N. Clegg, A. Walmsley, Brígido Vicuña, B. Danielsen, M. V. Constable, Marta Prymak-Moyle
{"title":"减轻地质阻挡应用中风险的UDAR技术的演变","authors":"Supriya Sinha, Frank Antonsen, N. Clegg, A. Walmsley, Brígido Vicuña, B. Danielsen, M. V. Constable, Marta Prymak-Moyle","doi":"10.2118/215553-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Complications during drilling and completion operations caused by subsurface geology have a significant impact on rig time, cost, assets, and even human life, if risk and incident severity is not well understood. Risk and tolerance evaluation processes are essential for completing successful drilling programs and final casing designs. While log-based correlation methodologies can be used, they are limited to scenarios where appropriate offset well data control exists, and they only provide information after the hole has been drilled. The development of technologies that provide warning of a hazardous zone before it is penetrated are therefore desirable. Ultradeep Azimuthal Resistivity (UDAR) tools are deployed for such scenarios and provide high value when used in integrated interpretations to identify hazards ahead of drill bit.\n Seismic data is used as a first step to predict and map subsurface characteristics such as pressure regimes, faults, and fluid contacts. Offset and pilot hole data further complements assessment of these features enabling more precise risk assessment. Commonly, near-bit measurements such as resistivity and gamma ray have been used for these correlations in conjunction with sonic and density measurements. The mapping of horizons from seismic data can have 10s to 100s of meters of vertical uncertainty, while offset data in exploration campaigns is typically sparse and near-bit measurements require drilling into the zone of risk. Pilot holes therefore become a costly necessity, however, if sufficient resistivity contrast exists UDAR can be used for remote boundary mapping, without drilling into the geohazards, thus reducing cost and de-risking the operation.\n This paper presents several case studies where UDAR technology was deployed in near vertical to horizontal wells to map geohazards before they were penetrated using different techniques, allowing optimization of the stopping point in diverse scenarios. This includes a case where the technology was used to geostop in a horizontal section prior to penetration of a major structural sealing fault plane that bounded the productive reservoir interval. UDAR has been successfully used to manage seismic uncertainty, support the decision-making process for core point selection, reduce exposure of unstable overburden shales and geostop above abnormal and subnormal pressure zones.\n Mapping a geohazard and proactively stopping at a particular depth is a complex operation and evaluation of the rock properties with respect to the sensitivity of the measurements and uncertainty in the models is important. Limitations in measurement sensitivity can lead to potential masking of top reservoir picks and increased uncertainty in both boundary positions and the inverted resistivity. Improvements such as new UDAR transmitter designs being embedded into Rotary Steerable Systems allow near-bit placement of this technology, demonstrating the continual evolution of this technology and how it assists risk mitigation in geostopping applications.","PeriodicalId":213852,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 06, 2023","volume":"44 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution of UDAR Technologies for Risk Mitigation in Geostopping Applications\",\"authors\":\"Supriya Sinha, Frank Antonsen, N. Clegg, A. Walmsley, Brígido Vicuña, B. Danielsen, M. V. Constable, Marta Prymak-Moyle\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/215553-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Complications during drilling and completion operations caused by subsurface geology have a significant impact on rig time, cost, assets, and even human life, if risk and incident severity is not well understood. Risk and tolerance evaluation processes are essential for completing successful drilling programs and final casing designs. While log-based correlation methodologies can be used, they are limited to scenarios where appropriate offset well data control exists, and they only provide information after the hole has been drilled. The development of technologies that provide warning of a hazardous zone before it is penetrated are therefore desirable. Ultradeep Azimuthal Resistivity (UDAR) tools are deployed for such scenarios and provide high value when used in integrated interpretations to identify hazards ahead of drill bit.\\n Seismic data is used as a first step to predict and map subsurface characteristics such as pressure regimes, faults, and fluid contacts. Offset and pilot hole data further complements assessment of these features enabling more precise risk assessment. Commonly, near-bit measurements such as resistivity and gamma ray have been used for these correlations in conjunction with sonic and density measurements. The mapping of horizons from seismic data can have 10s to 100s of meters of vertical uncertainty, while offset data in exploration campaigns is typically sparse and near-bit measurements require drilling into the zone of risk. Pilot holes therefore become a costly necessity, however, if sufficient resistivity contrast exists UDAR can be used for remote boundary mapping, without drilling into the geohazards, thus reducing cost and de-risking the operation.\\n This paper presents several case studies where UDAR technology was deployed in near vertical to horizontal wells to map geohazards before they were penetrated using different techniques, allowing optimization of the stopping point in diverse scenarios. This includes a case where the technology was used to geostop in a horizontal section prior to penetration of a major structural sealing fault plane that bounded the productive reservoir interval. UDAR has been successfully used to manage seismic uncertainty, support the decision-making process for core point selection, reduce exposure of unstable overburden shales and geostop above abnormal and subnormal pressure zones.\\n Mapping a geohazard and proactively stopping at a particular depth is a complex operation and evaluation of the rock properties with respect to the sensitivity of the measurements and uncertainty in the models is important. Limitations in measurement sensitivity can lead to potential masking of top reservoir picks and increased uncertainty in both boundary positions and the inverted resistivity. Improvements such as new UDAR transmitter designs being embedded into Rotary Steerable Systems allow near-bit placement of this technology, demonstrating the continual evolution of this technology and how it assists risk mitigation in geostopping applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, September 06, 2023\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, September 06, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/215553-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 06, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/215553-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果风险和事故严重程度没有得到很好的了解,那么在钻井和完井作业中,由地下地质引起的并发症会对钻井时间、成本、资产甚至人的生命产生重大影响。风险和容差评估过程对于成功完成钻井计划和最终的套管设计至关重要。虽然可以使用基于测井的相关方法,但它们仅限于存在适当的邻井数据控制的情况,并且只能在钻井后提供信息。因此,开发在危险区域被穿透之前提供警告的技术是可取的。超深方位电阻率(UDAR)工具可用于此类场景,在进行综合解释时提供高价值,可在钻头之前识别危险。地震数据是预测和绘制地下特征(如压力状况、断层和流体接触)的第一步。邻井和先导井数据进一步补充了这些特征的评估,从而实现更精确的风险评估。通常,电阻率和伽马射线等近钻头测量已与声波和密度测量一起用于这些相关性。根据地震数据绘制的层位图在垂直方向上可能有10到100米的不确定性,而勘探活动中的偏移数据通常是稀疏的,近钻头测量需要钻进危险区域。然而,如果有足够的电阻率对比,UDAR可以用于远程边界测绘,而无需钻入地质危险区域,从而降低成本并降低操作风险。本文介绍了几个案例研究,在这些案例中,UDAR技术应用于近垂直井和水平井,在使用不同的技术进行钻进前绘制地质灾害地图,从而在不同的情况下优化停止点。这包括一个案例,该技术用于在穿透一个主要的构造封闭断平面之前在水平段进行土工封堵,该断层平面连接着生产层段。UDAR已经成功地用于管理地震的不确定性,支持核心点选择的决策过程,减少不稳定的上覆页岩的暴露,以及异常和亚正常压力带以上的地质停止层。测绘地质灾害并在特定深度进行主动停止是一项复杂的操作,对岩石特性的评估与测量的敏感性和模型的不确定性非常重要。测量灵敏度的限制可能导致顶部储层的潜在掩蔽,并增加边界位置和反向电阻率的不确定性。新的UDAR发射机设计嵌入到旋转导向系统中,从而实现了该技术的近钻头定位,展示了该技术的不断发展,以及它如何帮助降低地质阻挡应用中的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Evolution of UDAR Technologies for Risk Mitigation in Geostopping Applications
Complications during drilling and completion operations caused by subsurface geology have a significant impact on rig time, cost, assets, and even human life, if risk and incident severity is not well understood. Risk and tolerance evaluation processes are essential for completing successful drilling programs and final casing designs. While log-based correlation methodologies can be used, they are limited to scenarios where appropriate offset well data control exists, and they only provide information after the hole has been drilled. The development of technologies that provide warning of a hazardous zone before it is penetrated are therefore desirable. Ultradeep Azimuthal Resistivity (UDAR) tools are deployed for such scenarios and provide high value when used in integrated interpretations to identify hazards ahead of drill bit. Seismic data is used as a first step to predict and map subsurface characteristics such as pressure regimes, faults, and fluid contacts. Offset and pilot hole data further complements assessment of these features enabling more precise risk assessment. Commonly, near-bit measurements such as resistivity and gamma ray have been used for these correlations in conjunction with sonic and density measurements. The mapping of horizons from seismic data can have 10s to 100s of meters of vertical uncertainty, while offset data in exploration campaigns is typically sparse and near-bit measurements require drilling into the zone of risk. Pilot holes therefore become a costly necessity, however, if sufficient resistivity contrast exists UDAR can be used for remote boundary mapping, without drilling into the geohazards, thus reducing cost and de-risking the operation. This paper presents several case studies where UDAR technology was deployed in near vertical to horizontal wells to map geohazards before they were penetrated using different techniques, allowing optimization of the stopping point in diverse scenarios. This includes a case where the technology was used to geostop in a horizontal section prior to penetration of a major structural sealing fault plane that bounded the productive reservoir interval. UDAR has been successfully used to manage seismic uncertainty, support the decision-making process for core point selection, reduce exposure of unstable overburden shales and geostop above abnormal and subnormal pressure zones. Mapping a geohazard and proactively stopping at a particular depth is a complex operation and evaluation of the rock properties with respect to the sensitivity of the measurements and uncertainty in the models is important. Limitations in measurement sensitivity can lead to potential masking of top reservoir picks and increased uncertainty in both boundary positions and the inverted resistivity. Improvements such as new UDAR transmitter designs being embedded into Rotary Steerable Systems allow near-bit placement of this technology, demonstrating the continual evolution of this technology and how it assists risk mitigation in geostopping applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信