{"title":"公正补偿与“抚恤金”:英美法系的比较研究","authors":"Brendan Edgeworth","doi":"10.1515/eplj-2019-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[i]n this country, the land acquisition statutes have not only retained the English concept of the market value of land, but also have gone further: our legislation provides for other factors to be taken into account which an ordinary seller of land would not be able to obtain from an ordinary buyer; so that it is well understood here that the dispossessed owner may be entitled to a claim for ‘disturbance’ or a ‘solatium’ over and over the ordinary sale price of land.","PeriodicalId":338086,"journal":{"name":"European Property Law Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Just Compensation and ‘Solatium’: Comparative approaches in Common Law Systems\",\"authors\":\"Brendan Edgeworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/eplj-2019-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[i]n this country, the land acquisition statutes have not only retained the English concept of the market value of land, but also have gone further: our legislation provides for other factors to be taken into account which an ordinary seller of land would not be able to obtain from an ordinary buyer; so that it is well understood here that the dispossessed owner may be entitled to a claim for ‘disturbance’ or a ‘solatium’ over and over the ordinary sale price of land.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Property Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Property Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2019-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Property Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2019-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Just Compensation and ‘Solatium’: Comparative approaches in Common Law Systems
[i]n this country, the land acquisition statutes have not only retained the English concept of the market value of land, but also have gone further: our legislation provides for other factors to be taken into account which an ordinary seller of land would not be able to obtain from an ordinary buyer; so that it is well understood here that the dispossessed owner may be entitled to a claim for ‘disturbance’ or a ‘solatium’ over and over the ordinary sale price of land.