软件工程:如何接近它的电气工程师

Proceedings. Electrotechnical Conference Integrating Research, Industry and Education in Energy and Communication Engineering', Pub Date : 1989-04-11 DOI:10.1109/MELCON.1989.50154

I. Rozman, J. Gyorkos, P. Kokol, T. Welzer

{"title":"软件工程:如何接近它的电气工程师","authors":"I. Rozman, J. Gyorkos, P. Kokol, T. Welzer","doi":"10.1109/MELCON.1989.50154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An attempt is made to decide which formal software development methodology should be used to introduce software engineering to the electrical engineer. Two methodologies are compared: system analysis-system-design (SASD) and Jackson System Development (JSD). Nine postgraduate students of electrical engineering took part in this experiment. Each of them had to solve a specific problem according to both methodologies. A questionnaire was filled out by each student. The results obtained favor the SASD methodology because it is more understandable by an electrical engineer.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":380214,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Electrotechnical Conference Integrating Research, Industry and Education in Energy and Communication Engineering',","volume":"4 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software engineering: how to approach it the electrical engineer\",\"authors\":\"I. Rozman, J. Gyorkos, P. Kokol, T. Welzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MELCON.1989.50154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An attempt is made to decide which formal software development methodology should be used to introduce software engineering to the electrical engineer. Two methodologies are compared: system analysis-system-design (SASD) and Jackson System Development (JSD). Nine postgraduate students of electrical engineering took part in this experiment. Each of them had to solve a specific problem according to both methodologies. A questionnaire was filled out by each student. The results obtained favor the SASD methodology because it is more understandable by an electrical engineer.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":380214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Electrotechnical Conference Integrating Research, Industry and Education in Energy and Communication Engineering',\",\"volume\":\"4 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Electrotechnical Conference Integrating Research, Industry and Education in Energy and Communication Engineering',\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MELCON.1989.50154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Electrotechnical Conference Integrating Research, Industry and Education in Energy and Communication Engineering',","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MELCON.1989.50154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

尝试决定应该使用哪种正式的软件开发方法来向电气工程师介绍软件工程。比较了两种方法:系统分析-系统设计(ssd)和杰克逊系统开发(JSD)。9名电气工程专业的研究生参加了这个实验。他们每个人都必须根据这两种方法解决一个特定的问题。每个学生都填写了一份问卷。所获得的结果有利于sssd方法，因为它更容易被电气工程师理解

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Software engineering: how to approach it the electrical engineer

An attempt is made to decide which formal software development methodology should be used to introduce software engineering to the electrical engineer. Two methodologies are compared: system analysis-system-design (SASD) and Jackson System Development (JSD). Nine postgraduate students of electrical engineering took part in this experiment. Each of them had to solve a specific problem according to both methodologies. A questionnaire was filled out by each student. The results obtained favor the SASD methodology because it is more understandable by an electrical engineer.<>

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings. Electrotechnical Conference Integrating Research, Industry and Education in Energy and Communication Engineering',

自引率

0.00%

发文量