{"title":"可变性的代价","authors":"J. Ridoux, D. Veitch","doi":"10.1109/ISPCS.2008.4659208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explore the robustness of synchronization performed in the presence of variable latencies using two software clocks: the TSCclock, designed to replace ntpd for Internet synchronisation, and ptpd, a software implementation of IEEE-1588. Using a precise comparison methodology the TSCclock is shown to be more accurate and far more robust. We discuss the reasons why and the implications for IEEE-1588 more generally.","PeriodicalId":428276,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Precision Clock Synchronization for Measurement, Control and Communication","volume":"129 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cost of variability\",\"authors\":\"J. Ridoux, D. Veitch\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISPCS.2008.4659208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We explore the robustness of synchronization performed in the presence of variable latencies using two software clocks: the TSCclock, designed to replace ntpd for Internet synchronisation, and ptpd, a software implementation of IEEE-1588. Using a precise comparison methodology the TSCclock is shown to be more accurate and far more robust. We discuss the reasons why and the implications for IEEE-1588 more generally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Precision Clock Synchronization for Measurement, Control and Communication\",\"volume\":\"129 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Precision Clock Synchronization for Measurement, Control and Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPCS.2008.4659208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Precision Clock Synchronization for Measurement, Control and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPCS.2008.4659208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We explore the robustness of synchronization performed in the presence of variable latencies using two software clocks: the TSCclock, designed to replace ntpd for Internet synchronisation, and ptpd, a software implementation of IEEE-1588. Using a precise comparison methodology the TSCclock is shown to be more accurate and far more robust. We discuss the reasons why and the implications for IEEE-1588 more generally.