两种用于电动汽车的锥形感应电机的比较

U. Demir, S. Roggia, M. C. Aküner
{"title":"两种用于电动汽车的锥形感应电机的比较","authors":"U. Demir, S. Roggia, M. C. Aküner","doi":"10.1109/IEMDC.2019.8785320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the comparison between two conical machines designed for an electrical-vehicle application. An optimal case, with an optimal cone angle, is compared to a worst-case scenario where the tapering is increased up to the maximum allowed dimensions. Simulations show that when the cone angle is not appropriately chosen the advantages that a tapered motor can offer over a classical cylindrical machine can be lost. In order to show the worsening effects of a not well pondered cone angle choice, a prototype of the conical machine with the largest conical dimensions has been built. The results obtained using finite element models (FEM) have been confirmed through experimental tests demonstrating the validity of the numerical analyses.","PeriodicalId":378634,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC)","volume":"21 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Two Conical Induction Machines Designed for an Electric Vehicle Application\",\"authors\":\"U. Demir, S. Roggia, M. C. Aküner\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMDC.2019.8785320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focuses on the comparison between two conical machines designed for an electrical-vehicle application. An optimal case, with an optimal cone angle, is compared to a worst-case scenario where the tapering is increased up to the maximum allowed dimensions. Simulations show that when the cone angle is not appropriately chosen the advantages that a tapered motor can offer over a classical cylindrical machine can be lost. In order to show the worsening effects of a not well pondered cone angle choice, a prototype of the conical machine with the largest conical dimensions has been built. The results obtained using finite element models (FEM) have been confirmed through experimental tests demonstrating the validity of the numerical analyses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC)\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMDC.2019.8785320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMDC.2019.8785320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是比较为电动汽车应用而设计的两种锥形电机。将具有最佳锥角的最佳情况与将锥度增加到最大允许尺寸的最坏情况进行比较。仿真结果表明,锥度角选择不当,锥度电机相对于传统圆柱电机的优势就会丧失。为了说明锥体角选择不合理所造成的影响,建立了锥体尺寸最大的锥体加工样机。通过试验验证了有限元模型计算的结果,证明了数值分析的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Between Two Conical Induction Machines Designed for an Electric Vehicle Application
This study focuses on the comparison between two conical machines designed for an electrical-vehicle application. An optimal case, with an optimal cone angle, is compared to a worst-case scenario where the tapering is increased up to the maximum allowed dimensions. Simulations show that when the cone angle is not appropriately chosen the advantages that a tapered motor can offer over a classical cylindrical machine can be lost. In order to show the worsening effects of a not well pondered cone angle choice, a prototype of the conical machine with the largest conical dimensions has been built. The results obtained using finite element models (FEM) have been confirmed through experimental tests demonstrating the validity of the numerical analyses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信