{"title":"不一致数学的解放论","authors":"Franci Mangraviti","doi":"10.26686/ajl.v29i2.8289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Val Plumwood charged classical logic not only with the invalidity of some of its laws, but also with the support of systemic oppression through naturalization of the logical structure of dualisms. In this paper I show that the latter charge - unlike the former - can be carried over to classical mathematics, and I propose a new conception of inconsistent mathematics - queer incomaths - as a liberatory activity meant to undermine said naturalization.","PeriodicalId":367849,"journal":{"name":"The Australasian Journal of Logic","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Liberation Argument for Inconsistent Mathematics\",\"authors\":\"Franci Mangraviti\",\"doi\":\"10.26686/ajl.v29i2.8289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Val Plumwood charged classical logic not only with the invalidity of some of its laws, but also with the support of systemic oppression through naturalization of the logical structure of dualisms. In this paper I show that the latter charge - unlike the former - can be carried over to classical mathematics, and I propose a new conception of inconsistent mathematics - queer incomaths - as a liberatory activity meant to undermine said naturalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":367849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Australasian Journal of Logic\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Australasian Journal of Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v29i2.8289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australasian Journal of Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v29i2.8289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
Val Plumwood不仅指责古典逻辑的一些规律是无效的,而且还通过二元论逻辑结构的自然化来支持系统压迫。在这篇论文中,我展示了后者的指控——与前者不同——可以延续到经典数学中,我提出了一个新的不一致数学概念——酷儿数学——作为一种旨在破坏上述归化的解放活动。
The Liberation Argument for Inconsistent Mathematics
Val Plumwood charged classical logic not only with the invalidity of some of its laws, but also with the support of systemic oppression through naturalization of the logical structure of dualisms. In this paper I show that the latter charge - unlike the former - can be carried over to classical mathematics, and I propose a new conception of inconsistent mathematics - queer incomaths - as a liberatory activity meant to undermine said naturalization.