微分细化逻辑*

Sarah M. Loos, André Platzer
{"title":"微分细化逻辑*","authors":"Sarah M. Loos, André Platzer","doi":"10.1145/2933575.2934555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce differential refinement logic (dRℒ), a logic with first-class support for refinement relations on hybrid systems, and a proof calculus for verifying such relations. dRℒ simultaneously solves several seemingly different challenges common in theorem proving for hybrid systems: 1. When hybrid systems are complicated, it is useful to prove properties about simpler and related sub-systems before tackling the system as a whole. 2. Some models of hybrid systems can be implementation-specific. Verification can be aided by abstracting the system down to the core components necessary for safety, but only if the relations between the abstraction and the original system can be guaranteed. 3. One approach to taming the complexities of hybrid systems is to start with a simplified version of the system and iteratively expand it. However, this approach can be costly, since every iteration has to be proved safe from scratch, unless refinement relations can be leveraged in the proof. 4. When proofs become large, it is di cult to maintain a modular or comprehensible proof structure. By using a refinement relation to arrange proofs hierarchically according to the structure of natural subsystems, we can increase the readability and modularity of the resulting proof. dRℒ extends an existing specification and verification language for hybrid systems (differential dynamic logic, dℒ) by adding a refinement relation to directly compare hybrid systems. This paper gives a syntax, semantics, and proof calculus for dRℒ. We demonstrate its usefulness with examples where using refinement results in easier and better-structured proofs.","PeriodicalId":206395,"journal":{"name":"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Refinement Logic*\",\"authors\":\"Sarah M. Loos, André Platzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2933575.2934555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce differential refinement logic (dRℒ), a logic with first-class support for refinement relations on hybrid systems, and a proof calculus for verifying such relations. dRℒ simultaneously solves several seemingly different challenges common in theorem proving for hybrid systems: 1. When hybrid systems are complicated, it is useful to prove properties about simpler and related sub-systems before tackling the system as a whole. 2. Some models of hybrid systems can be implementation-specific. Verification can be aided by abstracting the system down to the core components necessary for safety, but only if the relations between the abstraction and the original system can be guaranteed. 3. One approach to taming the complexities of hybrid systems is to start with a simplified version of the system and iteratively expand it. However, this approach can be costly, since every iteration has to be proved safe from scratch, unless refinement relations can be leveraged in the proof. 4. When proofs become large, it is di cult to maintain a modular or comprehensible proof structure. By using a refinement relation to arrange proofs hierarchically according to the structure of natural subsystems, we can increase the readability and modularity of the resulting proof. dRℒ extends an existing specification and verification language for hybrid systems (differential dynamic logic, dℒ) by adding a refinement relation to directly compare hybrid systems. This paper gives a syntax, semantics, and proof calculus for dRℒ. We demonstrate its usefulness with examples where using refinement results in easier and better-structured proofs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2933575.2934555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2933575.2934555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

引入微分细化逻辑(dR ̄),这是一种对混合系统上的细化关系具有一级支持的逻辑,并给出了验证这种关系的证明演算。dR +同时解决了混合系统定理证明中常见的几个看似不同的挑战:当混合系统很复杂时,在将系统作为一个整体处理之前,证明简单的相关子系统的性质是有用的。2. 混合系统的一些模型可以是特定于实现的。可以通过将系统抽象到安全所需的核心组件来辅助验证,但前提是抽象与原始系统之间的关系可以得到保证。3.驯服混合系统复杂性的一种方法是从系统的简化版本开始,并迭代地扩展它。然而,这种方法可能代价高昂,因为必须从头证明每次迭代都是安全的,除非在证明中可以利用细化关系。4. 当证明变大时,很难维持模块化或可理解的证明结构。根据自然子系统的结构,利用改进关系对证明进行分层排列,提高了证明的可读性和模块化。dR - f扩展了现有的用于混合系统的规范和验证语言(微分动态逻辑,d - f),通过增加一个精炼关系来直接比较混合系统。本文给出了dR - h的语法、语义和证明演算。我们用一些例子来证明它的有用性,在这些例子中,使用细化可以得到更容易和结构更好的证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential Refinement Logic*
We introduce differential refinement logic (dRℒ), a logic with first-class support for refinement relations on hybrid systems, and a proof calculus for verifying such relations. dRℒ simultaneously solves several seemingly different challenges common in theorem proving for hybrid systems: 1. When hybrid systems are complicated, it is useful to prove properties about simpler and related sub-systems before tackling the system as a whole. 2. Some models of hybrid systems can be implementation-specific. Verification can be aided by abstracting the system down to the core components necessary for safety, but only if the relations between the abstraction and the original system can be guaranteed. 3. One approach to taming the complexities of hybrid systems is to start with a simplified version of the system and iteratively expand it. However, this approach can be costly, since every iteration has to be proved safe from scratch, unless refinement relations can be leveraged in the proof. 4. When proofs become large, it is di cult to maintain a modular or comprehensible proof structure. By using a refinement relation to arrange proofs hierarchically according to the structure of natural subsystems, we can increase the readability and modularity of the resulting proof. dRℒ extends an existing specification and verification language for hybrid systems (differential dynamic logic, dℒ) by adding a refinement relation to directly compare hybrid systems. This paper gives a syntax, semantics, and proof calculus for dRℒ. We demonstrate its usefulness with examples where using refinement results in easier and better-structured proofs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信