经验模态分解方法在数字稳像中的应用对比分析

Neha Kottawar, D. J. Tuptewar
{"title":"经验模态分解方法在数字稳像中的应用对比分析","authors":"Neha Kottawar, D. J. Tuptewar","doi":"10.1109/ICCIC.2014.7238284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper comparative analysis of digital image stabilization (DIS) is proposed. For comparison purpose Basic Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), Improved EMD, Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) and Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (CEEMD) methods are considered. Method used for digital image stabilization is of fully data driven approach. With the comparative analysis best version of the EMD for DIS on the basis of low RMSE error is decided. The concept used to determine jitter is high frequency and low amplitude property. Combination of each EMD method and Hilbert Transform is used for the analysis. Various methods of EMD give the different results the better method for digital image stabilization is decided and parameters of EEMD and CEEMD method are globalised.","PeriodicalId":187874,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of digital image stabilization by using empirical mode decomposition methods\",\"authors\":\"Neha Kottawar, D. J. Tuptewar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCIC.2014.7238284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper comparative analysis of digital image stabilization (DIS) is proposed. For comparison purpose Basic Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), Improved EMD, Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) and Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (CEEMD) methods are considered. Method used for digital image stabilization is of fully data driven approach. With the comparative analysis best version of the EMD for DIS on the basis of low RMSE error is decided. The concept used to determine jitter is high frequency and low amplitude property. Combination of each EMD method and Hilbert Transform is used for the analysis. Various methods of EMD give the different results the better method for digital image stabilization is decided and parameters of EEMD and CEEMD method are globalised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIC.2014.7238284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIC.2014.7238284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文对数字稳像(DIS)技术进行了比较分析。为了比较基本经验模态分解(EMD)、改进经验模态分解(EMD)、集成经验模态分解(EEMD)和完全集成经验模态分解(CEEMD)方法。采用全数据驱动的数字稳像方法。通过比较分析,确定了在低均方根误差基础上的DIS最佳EMD版本。用来确定抖动的概念是高频低幅特性。将各种EMD方法与希尔伯特变换相结合进行分析。不同的EMD方法得到了不同的结果,确定了较好的数字稳像方法,并对EEMD和CEEMD方法的参数进行了全局化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of digital image stabilization by using empirical mode decomposition methods
In this paper comparative analysis of digital image stabilization (DIS) is proposed. For comparison purpose Basic Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), Improved EMD, Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) and Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (CEEMD) methods are considered. Method used for digital image stabilization is of fully data driven approach. With the comparative analysis best version of the EMD for DIS on the basis of low RMSE error is decided. The concept used to determine jitter is high frequency and low amplitude property. Combination of each EMD method and Hilbert Transform is used for the analysis. Various methods of EMD give the different results the better method for digital image stabilization is decided and parameters of EEMD and CEEMD method are globalised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信