{"title":"《底特律条约》时代,1949-1950","authors":"D. Clark","doi":"10.5622/ILLINOIS/9780252042010.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 1950 GM-UAW contract, called \"The Treaty of Detroit\" by Fortune magazine, dominates accounts of postwar U.S. labor history because it seemed to ensure steady employment, increasing wages, and improved benefits, like pensions, for autoworkers. But the Treaty of Detroit and comparable contracts with Chrysler and Ford were efforts to achieve some semblance of stability and predictability in a volatile industry, not the confirmation and continued promise of the postwar boom. The contracts were signed after a year of national recession, marked by intensifying competition in the auto industry, with production speedups and strikes, new efforts at automation (the replacement of jobs with machinery), national coal and steel strikes, and chronic layoffs for autoworkers. The Korean War led to further instability.","PeriodicalId":312458,"journal":{"name":"Disruption in Detroit","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Era of “The Treaty of Detroit,” 1949–1950\",\"authors\":\"D. Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.5622/ILLINOIS/9780252042010.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 1950 GM-UAW contract, called \\\"The Treaty of Detroit\\\" by Fortune magazine, dominates accounts of postwar U.S. labor history because it seemed to ensure steady employment, increasing wages, and improved benefits, like pensions, for autoworkers. But the Treaty of Detroit and comparable contracts with Chrysler and Ford were efforts to achieve some semblance of stability and predictability in a volatile industry, not the confirmation and continued promise of the postwar boom. The contracts were signed after a year of national recession, marked by intensifying competition in the auto industry, with production speedups and strikes, new efforts at automation (the replacement of jobs with machinery), national coal and steel strikes, and chronic layoffs for autoworkers. The Korean War led to further instability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disruption in Detroit\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disruption in Detroit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5622/ILLINOIS/9780252042010.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disruption in Detroit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5622/ILLINOIS/9780252042010.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1950年通用汽车与uaw签订的合同被《财富》杂志称为“底特律条约”,在战后美国劳工史上占据主导地位,因为它似乎确保了稳定的就业,提高了工资,并改善了汽车工人的福利,比如养老金。但《底特律条约》(Treaty of Detroit)以及与克莱斯勒(Chrysler)和福特(Ford)签订的类似合同,都是为了在一个动荡的行业中实现某种表面上的稳定和可预测性,而不是对战后繁荣的确认和持续承诺。在签署这些合同之前,美国经历了一年的经济衰退,汽车行业的竞争加剧,生产加速,罢工,自动化(用机器取代工作)的新努力,全国煤炭和钢铁罢工,以及汽车工人的长期裁员。朝鲜战争导致了进一步的不稳定。
The 1950 GM-UAW contract, called "The Treaty of Detroit" by Fortune magazine, dominates accounts of postwar U.S. labor history because it seemed to ensure steady employment, increasing wages, and improved benefits, like pensions, for autoworkers. But the Treaty of Detroit and comparable contracts with Chrysler and Ford were efforts to achieve some semblance of stability and predictability in a volatile industry, not the confirmation and continued promise of the postwar boom. The contracts were signed after a year of national recession, marked by intensifying competition in the auto industry, with production speedups and strikes, new efforts at automation (the replacement of jobs with machinery), national coal and steel strikes, and chronic layoffs for autoworkers. The Korean War led to further instability.