组合符号执行:增量解决重访

Yude Lin, Tim Miller, H. Søndergaard
{"title":"组合符号执行:增量解决重访","authors":"Yude Lin, Tim Miller, H. Søndergaard","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2016.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Symbolic execution can automatically explore different execution paths in a system under test and generate tests to precisely cover them. It has two main advantages—being automatic and thorough within a theory—and has many successful applications. The bottleneck of symbolic execution currently is the computation consumption for complex systems. Compositional Symbolic Execution (CSE) introduces a summarisation module to eliminate the redundancy in the exploration of repeatedly encountered code. In our previous work, we generalised the summarisation for any code fragments instead of functions. In this paper, we transplant this idea onto LLVM with many additional features, one of them being the use of incremental solving. We show that the combination of CSE and incremental solving is mutually beneficial. The obvious weakness of CSE is the lack of context during summarisation. We discuss the use of assumption-based features, available in modern constraint solvers, as a way to overcome this problem.","PeriodicalId":339123,"journal":{"name":"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compositional Symbolic Execution: Incremental Solving Revisited\",\"authors\":\"Yude Lin, Tim Miller, H. Søndergaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC.2016.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Symbolic execution can automatically explore different execution paths in a system under test and generate tests to precisely cover them. It has two main advantages—being automatic and thorough within a theory—and has many successful applications. The bottleneck of symbolic execution currently is the computation consumption for complex systems. Compositional Symbolic Execution (CSE) introduces a summarisation module to eliminate the redundancy in the exploration of repeatedly encountered code. In our previous work, we generalised the summarisation for any code fragments instead of functions. In this paper, we transplant this idea onto LLVM with many additional features, one of them being the use of incremental solving. We show that the combination of CSE and incremental solving is mutually beneficial. The obvious weakness of CSE is the lack of context during summarisation. We discuss the use of assumption-based features, available in modern constraint solvers, as a way to overcome this problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2016.046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2016.046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

符号执行可以自动探索被测系统中的不同执行路径,并生成精确覆盖它们的测试。它有两个主要优点——在一个理论中是自动的和彻底的——并且有许多成功的应用。目前符号执行的瓶颈是复杂系统的计算消耗。组合符号执行(CSE)引入了一个总结模块,以消除在探索重复遇到的代码时的冗余。在我们之前的工作中,我们概括了任何代码片段而不是函数的摘要。在本文中,我们将这个想法移植到LLVM中,并添加了许多附加功能,其中之一就是使用增量求解。我们证明了CSE和增量求解的结合是互利的。CSE的明显弱点是在总结时缺乏上下文。我们讨论了在现代约束求解器中可用的基于假设的特征的使用,作为克服这个问题的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compositional Symbolic Execution: Incremental Solving Revisited
Symbolic execution can automatically explore different execution paths in a system under test and generate tests to precisely cover them. It has two main advantages—being automatic and thorough within a theory—and has many successful applications. The bottleneck of symbolic execution currently is the computation consumption for complex systems. Compositional Symbolic Execution (CSE) introduces a summarisation module to eliminate the redundancy in the exploration of repeatedly encountered code. In our previous work, we generalised the summarisation for any code fragments instead of functions. In this paper, we transplant this idea onto LLVM with many additional features, one of them being the use of incremental solving. We show that the combination of CSE and incremental solving is mutually beneficial. The obvious weakness of CSE is the lack of context during summarisation. We discuss the use of assumption-based features, available in modern constraint solvers, as a way to overcome this problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信