{"title":"髂嵴骨移植收获:各种技术和供体部位发病率的前瞻性研究","authors":"S. Kukreja, H. Raza, A. Agrawal","doi":"10.5580/27f6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background - Harvesting autograft bone from the ilium is not without complications. When cases are reported in follow-ups, investigators usually concentrate upon treatment outcome of the principle problems and not on the donor site morbidity from harvesting a bone graft. The purpose of our study is to assess the complications related to bone grafting site of iliac crest, simultaneously evaluation and assessment of various techniques used for harvesting the bone graft from the iliac crest. Material and methods - 56 patients were included in our study, which fulfilled the criteria of at least 6 months follow up. Bone graft was harvested from anterior or posterior iliac crest by wolfe-kawamoto’s, outer cortex, inner cortex and tricortical graft harvesting and trephine techniques. Results – Graft harvested from anterior crest in 49 cases (88%), posterior crest in 6 cases (11%) and bilateral anterior crest in 1 (1.8%). Graft harvesting techniques-wolfe-kaamoto’s used in 15(27%), outer cortex in 30 patients (55%), inner cortex in 1(1.8%), and tricortical in 8(14%) and trephine method in 1(1.8%) patient. Average amount of graft harvested from posterior cortex was more compared to anterior crest (13.3/9.6 gm). Donor site complications-infection rate 7.2% (superficial-3 patients, deep-1 patient), hematoma 1.8% (n-1), cutaneous nerve injury 14.3% (temporary loss of sensation 3, residual loss in 5 patients), donor site pain 10.6% (temporary-5, residual-1) and direct incomplete hernia in 1 patient (1.8%). Total donor","PeriodicalId":322846,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"286 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvesting: Prospective Study Of Various Techniques And Donor Site Morbidity\",\"authors\":\"S. Kukreja, H. Raza, A. Agrawal\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/27f6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background - Harvesting autograft bone from the ilium is not without complications. When cases are reported in follow-ups, investigators usually concentrate upon treatment outcome of the principle problems and not on the donor site morbidity from harvesting a bone graft. The purpose of our study is to assess the complications related to bone grafting site of iliac crest, simultaneously evaluation and assessment of various techniques used for harvesting the bone graft from the iliac crest. Material and methods - 56 patients were included in our study, which fulfilled the criteria of at least 6 months follow up. Bone graft was harvested from anterior or posterior iliac crest by wolfe-kawamoto’s, outer cortex, inner cortex and tricortical graft harvesting and trephine techniques. Results – Graft harvested from anterior crest in 49 cases (88%), posterior crest in 6 cases (11%) and bilateral anterior crest in 1 (1.8%). Graft harvesting techniques-wolfe-kaamoto’s used in 15(27%), outer cortex in 30 patients (55%), inner cortex in 1(1.8%), and tricortical in 8(14%) and trephine method in 1(1.8%) patient. Average amount of graft harvested from posterior cortex was more compared to anterior crest (13.3/9.6 gm). Donor site complications-infection rate 7.2% (superficial-3 patients, deep-1 patient), hematoma 1.8% (n-1), cutaneous nerve injury 14.3% (temporary loss of sensation 3, residual loss in 5 patients), donor site pain 10.6% (temporary-5, residual-1) and direct incomplete hernia in 1 patient (1.8%). Total donor\",\"PeriodicalId\":322846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"286 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/27f6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/27f6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvesting: Prospective Study Of Various Techniques And Donor Site Morbidity
Background - Harvesting autograft bone from the ilium is not without complications. When cases are reported in follow-ups, investigators usually concentrate upon treatment outcome of the principle problems and not on the donor site morbidity from harvesting a bone graft. The purpose of our study is to assess the complications related to bone grafting site of iliac crest, simultaneously evaluation and assessment of various techniques used for harvesting the bone graft from the iliac crest. Material and methods - 56 patients were included in our study, which fulfilled the criteria of at least 6 months follow up. Bone graft was harvested from anterior or posterior iliac crest by wolfe-kawamoto’s, outer cortex, inner cortex and tricortical graft harvesting and trephine techniques. Results – Graft harvested from anterior crest in 49 cases (88%), posterior crest in 6 cases (11%) and bilateral anterior crest in 1 (1.8%). Graft harvesting techniques-wolfe-kaamoto’s used in 15(27%), outer cortex in 30 patients (55%), inner cortex in 1(1.8%), and tricortical in 8(14%) and trephine method in 1(1.8%) patient. Average amount of graft harvested from posterior cortex was more compared to anterior crest (13.3/9.6 gm). Donor site complications-infection rate 7.2% (superficial-3 patients, deep-1 patient), hematoma 1.8% (n-1), cutaneous nerve injury 14.3% (temporary loss of sensation 3, residual loss in 5 patients), donor site pain 10.6% (temporary-5, residual-1) and direct incomplete hernia in 1 patient (1.8%). Total donor