危机中的职业年金重组:美国劳资个案研究

David S. Blitzstein
{"title":"危机中的职业年金重组:美国劳资个案研究","authors":"David S. Blitzstein","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2271188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defined benefit pension funds in the United States experienced material declines in funded ratios in the past decade. The events of 2008 coincided with the implementation of a new federal pension funding regime, the Pension Protection Act of 2006. This case study describes a unique pension agreement between a major American labor union and the sixth largest American employer, involving the merger of four underfunded multiemployer pension plans that restructured the legacy benefits through a financial transaction and redesigned future benefits and funding policy.","PeriodicalId":262144,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Labor & Employment Law (Topic)","volume":"176 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restructuring Occupational Pension Plans in Crisis: A US Labor–Management Case Study\",\"authors\":\"David S. Blitzstein\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2271188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Defined benefit pension funds in the United States experienced material declines in funded ratios in the past decade. The events of 2008 coincided with the implementation of a new federal pension funding regime, the Pension Protection Act of 2006. This case study describes a unique pension agreement between a major American labor union and the sixth largest American employer, involving the merger of four underfunded multiemployer pension plans that restructured the legacy benefits through a financial transaction and redesigned future benefits and funding policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Labor & Employment Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"176 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Labor & Employment Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2271188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Labor & Employment Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2271188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在过去的十年里,美国的固定收益养老基金的基金比率经历了实质性的下降。2008年的事件恰逢新的联邦养老基金制度——《2006年养老金保护法案》的实施。本案例研究描述了美国主要工会与美国第六大雇主之间的一项独特的养老金协议,涉及四个资金不足的多雇主养老金计划的合并,这些计划通过金融交易重组了遗留福利,并重新设计了未来的福利和资助政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restructuring Occupational Pension Plans in Crisis: A US Labor–Management Case Study
Defined benefit pension funds in the United States experienced material declines in funded ratios in the past decade. The events of 2008 coincided with the implementation of a new federal pension funding regime, the Pension Protection Act of 2006. This case study describes a unique pension agreement between a major American labor union and the sixth largest American employer, involving the merger of four underfunded multiemployer pension plans that restructured the legacy benefits through a financial transaction and redesigned future benefits and funding policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信