滴灌水稻生产的经济分析:以达达尼尔河-土耳其为例

I. Tas, Yacin Coskun, M. Akçura, Mahmut Kaplan, Zeki Gokalp
{"title":"滴灌水稻生产的经济分析:以达达尼尔河-土耳其为例","authors":"I. Tas, Yacin Coskun, M. Akçura, Mahmut Kaplan, Zeki Gokalp","doi":"10.47068/ctns.2022.v11i21.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In traditional paddy production, large water losses may occur due to drainage, evaporation and deep percolation (groundwater is highly polluted). In addition, while production costs increase, it also decreases in production areas. This study has been researched together with the usability of the drip irrigation method (DI) to reduce the global footprint of water in paddy production and its economic analysis. In the experiment, two irrigation intervals (2 and 4 days), four irrigation water levels (75, 100, 125 and 150% of cumulative Class A Pan values) and three different paddy genotypes (Baldo, Osmancik and Ronaldo) were investigated. In the research, irrigation water between 513-820 mm was applied to the treatments. Actual Evapotranspiration (ETa) values are 565-855 mm; The Crop Water Productivity (CWP) ranged from 0.84-1.35 kg ha-1 m-3 and the Irrigation Water Use Efficiency (IWUE) ranged between 0.95-1.49 kg ha-1 m-3. Economical water productivity (EWP) was calculated between 0.79-1.24 $ m-3 and the cost-benefit (B/C) ratio was calculated between 1.11-2.33. When the traditional cultivation method, the ponding method in the pan, is compared to the province, it has been determined that water savings are between 70-81%. Yield according to branches was measured as 4882-10305 kg ha-1. According to the results of the research, up to 29% yield increase was achieved under the condition of applying 150% of the cumulative evaporation every 2 days.","PeriodicalId":254664,"journal":{"name":"Current Trends in Natural Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PADDY PRODUCTION WITH DRIP IRRIGATION: CASE STUDY OF DARDANELLES-TURKEY\",\"authors\":\"I. Tas, Yacin Coskun, M. Akçura, Mahmut Kaplan, Zeki Gokalp\",\"doi\":\"10.47068/ctns.2022.v11i21.050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In traditional paddy production, large water losses may occur due to drainage, evaporation and deep percolation (groundwater is highly polluted). In addition, while production costs increase, it also decreases in production areas. This study has been researched together with the usability of the drip irrigation method (DI) to reduce the global footprint of water in paddy production and its economic analysis. In the experiment, two irrigation intervals (2 and 4 days), four irrigation water levels (75, 100, 125 and 150% of cumulative Class A Pan values) and three different paddy genotypes (Baldo, Osmancik and Ronaldo) were investigated. In the research, irrigation water between 513-820 mm was applied to the treatments. Actual Evapotranspiration (ETa) values are 565-855 mm; The Crop Water Productivity (CWP) ranged from 0.84-1.35 kg ha-1 m-3 and the Irrigation Water Use Efficiency (IWUE) ranged between 0.95-1.49 kg ha-1 m-3. Economical water productivity (EWP) was calculated between 0.79-1.24 $ m-3 and the cost-benefit (B/C) ratio was calculated between 1.11-2.33. When the traditional cultivation method, the ponding method in the pan, is compared to the province, it has been determined that water savings are between 70-81%. Yield according to branches was measured as 4882-10305 kg ha-1. According to the results of the research, up to 29% yield increase was achieved under the condition of applying 150% of the cumulative evaporation every 2 days.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Trends in Natural Sciences\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Trends in Natural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47068/ctns.2022.v11i21.050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Trends in Natural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47068/ctns.2022.v11i21.050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在传统的水稻生产中,由于排水、蒸发和深层渗透(地下水污染严重),可能会造成大量的水分损失。此外,在生产成本增加的同时,生产区域的成本也在下降。本研究结合滴灌技术(DI)减少全球水稻生产水足迹的可行性及其经济分析进行了研究。试验采用2个灌溉间隔(2和4 d)、4个灌溉水位(累计A类Pan值的75、100、125和150%)和3种不同水稻基因型(Baldo、Osmancik和Ronaldo)进行研究。在试验中,灌溉水量为513 ~ 820 mm。实际蒸散发(ETa)值为565 ~ 855 mm;作物水分生产力(CWP)为0.84 ~ 1.35 kg ha-1 m-3,灌溉水分利用效率(IWUE)为0.95 ~ 1.49 kg ha-1 m-3。经济水生产力(EWP)在0.79 ~ 1.24 $ m-3之间,成本效益(B/C)比在1.11 ~ 2.33之间。当传统的栽培方法,即锅内蓄水法,与省内进行比较时,确定节水在70-81%之间。按枝产量测定为4882 ~ 10305 kg hm -1。研究结果表明,在每2 d施用150%累积蒸发量的条件下,产量可提高29%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PADDY PRODUCTION WITH DRIP IRRIGATION: CASE STUDY OF DARDANELLES-TURKEY
In traditional paddy production, large water losses may occur due to drainage, evaporation and deep percolation (groundwater is highly polluted). In addition, while production costs increase, it also decreases in production areas. This study has been researched together with the usability of the drip irrigation method (DI) to reduce the global footprint of water in paddy production and its economic analysis. In the experiment, two irrigation intervals (2 and 4 days), four irrigation water levels (75, 100, 125 and 150% of cumulative Class A Pan values) and three different paddy genotypes (Baldo, Osmancik and Ronaldo) were investigated. In the research, irrigation water between 513-820 mm was applied to the treatments. Actual Evapotranspiration (ETa) values are 565-855 mm; The Crop Water Productivity (CWP) ranged from 0.84-1.35 kg ha-1 m-3 and the Irrigation Water Use Efficiency (IWUE) ranged between 0.95-1.49 kg ha-1 m-3. Economical water productivity (EWP) was calculated between 0.79-1.24 $ m-3 and the cost-benefit (B/C) ratio was calculated between 1.11-2.33. When the traditional cultivation method, the ponding method in the pan, is compared to the province, it has been determined that water savings are between 70-81%. Yield according to branches was measured as 4882-10305 kg ha-1. According to the results of the research, up to 29% yield increase was achieved under the condition of applying 150% of the cumulative evaporation every 2 days.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信