{"title":"策略和结构:重复博弈方法","authors":"F. Balmaceda","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.930059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Williamson (1975), a divisionalized and fully decentralized structure, the so called M-form, is the optimal structure via which firms that pursue diversification gain economic benefits from internalizing transactions. However, empirical evidence shows that a centralized, multi-divisional structure, the so called CM-Form, is the optimal structure when related diversification is the objective, while the M-form is optimal when seeking unrelated diversification. This paper proposes a repeated game model to study the link between strategy and structure. The main prediction of the model is that a related strategy is, overall, better served by a centralized structure, while an unrelated strategy is better served by a decentralized structure.","PeriodicalId":230377,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Integration (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategy and Structure: A Repeated Game Approach\",\"authors\":\"F. Balmaceda\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.930059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to Williamson (1975), a divisionalized and fully decentralized structure, the so called M-form, is the optimal structure via which firms that pursue diversification gain economic benefits from internalizing transactions. However, empirical evidence shows that a centralized, multi-divisional structure, the so called CM-Form, is the optimal structure when related diversification is the objective, while the M-form is optimal when seeking unrelated diversification. This paper proposes a repeated game model to study the link between strategy and structure. The main prediction of the model is that a related strategy is, overall, better served by a centralized structure, while an unrelated strategy is better served by a decentralized structure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":230377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Integration (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Integration (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.930059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Integration (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.930059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
According to Williamson (1975), a divisionalized and fully decentralized structure, the so called M-form, is the optimal structure via which firms that pursue diversification gain economic benefits from internalizing transactions. However, empirical evidence shows that a centralized, multi-divisional structure, the so called CM-Form, is the optimal structure when related diversification is the objective, while the M-form is optimal when seeking unrelated diversification. This paper proposes a repeated game model to study the link between strategy and structure. The main prediction of the model is that a related strategy is, overall, better served by a centralized structure, while an unrelated strategy is better served by a decentralized structure.