退休准备如何随性别和家庭状况而变化:对x世代退休储蓄不足的评估

Jack L. VanDerhei
{"title":"退休准备如何随性别和家庭状况而变化:对x世代退休储蓄不足的评估","authors":"Jack L. VanDerhei","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3318534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measuring retirement security — or retirement income adequacy — is an extremely important topic. In recent years, there has been an increasing emphasis on the retirement income adequacy of widows and single women. EBRI’s Retirement Security Projection Model® (RSPM) can assess the size of households’ retirement deficit by modeling Retirement Savings Shortfalls (RSS). In this Issue Brief, an RSPM® module classifies households by the following gender and marital statuses: single female, widow, single male, and widower. Key findings are: \n \nThe retirement deficit — or additional savings required to meet basic needs in retirement — is higher for both widows and single females: \n \n- The average RSS is $18,476 per individual for married households where the female dies first (widowers). \n \n- The average RSS is $22,783 for married households where the male dies first (widows). \n \n- The average RSS is $37,690 for single males. \n \n- The average RSS is $72,883 for single females. \n \n- When households for which no shortfall is projected are excluded from the analysis, the average size of the shortfall is $76,896 for widows vs. $82,937 for widowers. Single females in the lowest pre-retirement wage quartile have an average RSS of $110,412 vs. those in the highest quartile with an average RSS of only $28,951. For single males, the gender discrepancy in average RSS goes from $29,736 for those in the lowest wage quartile to $12,465 for those in the highest quartile. \n \nNot only are single females more likely to have retirement deficits, their retirement deficits are likely to be significantly larger than those of other cohorts. \n \n- Single females are the only cohort with at least 50 percent of households having a deficit. \n \n- The median RSS for this group is $19,900. \n \n- 10 percent of single females have an RSS of at least $222,592. \n \nNearly half (48 percent) of single females at the lowest income quartile have at least a $100,000 RSS (connoting serious potential financial complications in retirement). \n \n- This compares to a third (33 percent) of single males and 42 percent of widows. \n \n- Even in the highest income quartile 13 percent of single females have an RSS of at least $100,000, vs. 7 percent for single males, 4 percent for widows, and 3 percent for widowers. \n \nLack of eligibility for participation in a defined contribution (DC) plan significantly increases savings shortfalls. \n \n- Single females with no future eligibility in a DC plan have an average RSS of $97,325 vs. the $24,486 average RSS of those with at least 21–30 years of future eligibility. o - DC plan eligibility. \n \n- The discrepancy in average RSS between widows and widowers with no future DC plan eligibility is $6,529. \n \nIn contrast, future eligibility in DC plans can dramatically reduce serious potential financial complications in retirement. \n \n- 42 percent of female households with no future DC plan eligibility have an RSS of at least $100,000 compared with 11 percent of those with 21–30 years of future eligibility. \n \n- 13 percent of widows with no future DC plan eligibility have an RSS of at least $100,000, vs. 3 percent with 21–30 years of future eligibility. \n \nAuto portability — where a participant’s account from a former employer’s retirement plan would be automatically combined with their active account in a new employer’s plan — can also have a large impact. \n \n- For those with 21–30 years of future DC eligibility, auto portability.","PeriodicalId":127004,"journal":{"name":"SIRN: Retirement Income (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Retirement Readiness Varies by Gender and Family Status: A Retirement Savings Shortfall Assessment of Gen Xers\",\"authors\":\"Jack L. VanDerhei\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3318534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Measuring retirement security — or retirement income adequacy — is an extremely important topic. In recent years, there has been an increasing emphasis on the retirement income adequacy of widows and single women. EBRI’s Retirement Security Projection Model® (RSPM) can assess the size of households’ retirement deficit by modeling Retirement Savings Shortfalls (RSS). In this Issue Brief, an RSPM® module classifies households by the following gender and marital statuses: single female, widow, single male, and widower. Key findings are: \\n \\nThe retirement deficit — or additional savings required to meet basic needs in retirement — is higher for both widows and single females: \\n \\n- The average RSS is $18,476 per individual for married households where the female dies first (widowers). \\n \\n- The average RSS is $22,783 for married households where the male dies first (widows). \\n \\n- The average RSS is $37,690 for single males. \\n \\n- The average RSS is $72,883 for single females. \\n \\n- When households for which no shortfall is projected are excluded from the analysis, the average size of the shortfall is $76,896 for widows vs. $82,937 for widowers. Single females in the lowest pre-retirement wage quartile have an average RSS of $110,412 vs. those in the highest quartile with an average RSS of only $28,951. For single males, the gender discrepancy in average RSS goes from $29,736 for those in the lowest wage quartile to $12,465 for those in the highest quartile. \\n \\nNot only are single females more likely to have retirement deficits, their retirement deficits are likely to be significantly larger than those of other cohorts. \\n \\n- Single females are the only cohort with at least 50 percent of households having a deficit. \\n \\n- The median RSS for this group is $19,900. \\n \\n- 10 percent of single females have an RSS of at least $222,592. \\n \\nNearly half (48 percent) of single females at the lowest income quartile have at least a $100,000 RSS (connoting serious potential financial complications in retirement). \\n \\n- This compares to a third (33 percent) of single males and 42 percent of widows. \\n \\n- Even in the highest income quartile 13 percent of single females have an RSS of at least $100,000, vs. 7 percent for single males, 4 percent for widows, and 3 percent for widowers. \\n \\nLack of eligibility for participation in a defined contribution (DC) plan significantly increases savings shortfalls. \\n \\n- Single females with no future eligibility in a DC plan have an average RSS of $97,325 vs. the $24,486 average RSS of those with at least 21–30 years of future eligibility. o - DC plan eligibility. \\n \\n- The discrepancy in average RSS between widows and widowers with no future DC plan eligibility is $6,529. \\n \\nIn contrast, future eligibility in DC plans can dramatically reduce serious potential financial complications in retirement. \\n \\n- 42 percent of female households with no future DC plan eligibility have an RSS of at least $100,000 compared with 11 percent of those with 21–30 years of future eligibility. \\n \\n- 13 percent of widows with no future DC plan eligibility have an RSS of at least $100,000, vs. 3 percent with 21–30 years of future eligibility. \\n \\nAuto portability — where a participant’s account from a former employer’s retirement plan would be automatically combined with their active account in a new employer’s plan — can also have a large impact. \\n \\n- For those with 21–30 years of future DC eligibility, auto portability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIRN: Retirement Income (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIRN: Retirement Income (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3318534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIRN: Retirement Income (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3318534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

衡量退休保障——或退休收入充足性——是一个极其重要的话题。近年来,越来越强调寡妇和单身妇女的退休收入是否足够。EBRI的退休保障预测模型®(RSPM)可以通过模拟退休储蓄缺口(RSS)来评估家庭退休赤字的规模。在本问题摘要中,RSPM®模块按以下性别和婚姻状况对家庭进行分类:单身女性、寡妇、单身男性和鳏夫。主要发现是:寡妇和单身妇女的退休赤字- -或满足退休时基本需要所需的额外储蓄- -都较高;-妇女先死的已婚家庭(鳏夫)的平均退休津贴为每人18,476美元。-男性先死的已婚家庭(寡妇)的平均补充福利津贴为22,783元。-单身男性的平均RSS为$37,690。-单身女性的平均RSS为72,883美元。-如果在分析中排除预计没有短缺的家庭,寡妇的平均短缺额为76,896美元,而鳏夫的平均短缺额为82,937美元。处于退休前最低工资四分位数的单身女性的平均相对收入过薪为110,412美元,而处于最高工资四分位数的单身女性的平均相对收入过薪仅为28,951美元。对于单身男性来说,平均RSS的性别差异从最低工资四分位数的29,736美元到最高工资四分位数的12,465美元不等。单身女性不仅更有可能出现退休赤字,而且她们的退休赤字可能比其他群体要大得多。-单身女性是唯一一个至少有50%的家庭处于赤字状态的群体。-这一群体的RSS中位数为19,900美元。10%的单身女性的RSS至少为222,592美元。在收入最低的四分之一的单身女性中,近一半(48%)至少有10万美元的退休金(这意味着退休后可能出现严重的财务问题)。-相比之下,单身男性占三分之一(33%),寡妇占42%。-即使在收入最高的四分之一中,13%的单身女性的RSS至少为10万美元,而单身男性为7%,寡妇为4%,鳏夫为3%。缺乏参加固定缴款(DC)计划的资格大大增加了储蓄不足。-未来没有资格参加固定缴款计划的单身女性的平均退休津贴为97,325元,而未来至少有21至30年资格的单身女性的平均退休津贴为24,486元。o - DC计划资格。-丧偶人士与没有未来DC计划资格的丧偶人士的平均退休津贴差值为6,529元。相比之下,未来参加固定缴款计划的资格可以大大减少退休时严重的潜在财务并发症。- 42%不具备未来固定缴款计划资格的女性家庭的固定退休帐户至少为10万元,而在具备21-30年未来固定缴款计划资格的女性家庭中,这一比例为11%。-未来没有DC计划资格的寡妇中,13%的人的RSS至少为10万美元,而未来有21-30年资格的寡妇中,这一比例为3%。自动移植性——参与人从前雇主的退休计划中的账户将自动与他们在新雇主的计划中的活跃账户相结合——也会产生很大的影响。-拥有21-30年未来DC资格的人士,可自动携带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Retirement Readiness Varies by Gender and Family Status: A Retirement Savings Shortfall Assessment of Gen Xers
Measuring retirement security — or retirement income adequacy — is an extremely important topic. In recent years, there has been an increasing emphasis on the retirement income adequacy of widows and single women. EBRI’s Retirement Security Projection Model® (RSPM) can assess the size of households’ retirement deficit by modeling Retirement Savings Shortfalls (RSS). In this Issue Brief, an RSPM® module classifies households by the following gender and marital statuses: single female, widow, single male, and widower. Key findings are: The retirement deficit — or additional savings required to meet basic needs in retirement — is higher for both widows and single females: - The average RSS is $18,476 per individual for married households where the female dies first (widowers). - The average RSS is $22,783 for married households where the male dies first (widows). - The average RSS is $37,690 for single males. - The average RSS is $72,883 for single females. - When households for which no shortfall is projected are excluded from the analysis, the average size of the shortfall is $76,896 for widows vs. $82,937 for widowers. Single females in the lowest pre-retirement wage quartile have an average RSS of $110,412 vs. those in the highest quartile with an average RSS of only $28,951. For single males, the gender discrepancy in average RSS goes from $29,736 for those in the lowest wage quartile to $12,465 for those in the highest quartile. Not only are single females more likely to have retirement deficits, their retirement deficits are likely to be significantly larger than those of other cohorts. - Single females are the only cohort with at least 50 percent of households having a deficit. - The median RSS for this group is $19,900. - 10 percent of single females have an RSS of at least $222,592. Nearly half (48 percent) of single females at the lowest income quartile have at least a $100,000 RSS (connoting serious potential financial complications in retirement). - This compares to a third (33 percent) of single males and 42 percent of widows. - Even in the highest income quartile 13 percent of single females have an RSS of at least $100,000, vs. 7 percent for single males, 4 percent for widows, and 3 percent for widowers. Lack of eligibility for participation in a defined contribution (DC) plan significantly increases savings shortfalls. - Single females with no future eligibility in a DC plan have an average RSS of $97,325 vs. the $24,486 average RSS of those with at least 21–30 years of future eligibility. o - DC plan eligibility. - The discrepancy in average RSS between widows and widowers with no future DC plan eligibility is $6,529. In contrast, future eligibility in DC plans can dramatically reduce serious potential financial complications in retirement. - 42 percent of female households with no future DC plan eligibility have an RSS of at least $100,000 compared with 11 percent of those with 21–30 years of future eligibility. - 13 percent of widows with no future DC plan eligibility have an RSS of at least $100,000, vs. 3 percent with 21–30 years of future eligibility. Auto portability — where a participant’s account from a former employer’s retirement plan would be automatically combined with their active account in a new employer’s plan — can also have a large impact. - For those with 21–30 years of future DC eligibility, auto portability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信