{"title":"改变课程开发者对课程评价与研究的态度","authors":"J. Rutherford","doi":"10.2307/1179155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the vantage point of most curriculum project directors, evaluation is, apparently, something to be ignored. When these directors think about evaluation at all, the probability is that most of them regard it as an annoyance or worse. While some project directors seem to think that the whole business of evaluation is, if not fraudulent, at least unnecessary, others reluctantly accept it as a facet of dissemination strategy. Some project directors, of course, treat evaluation seriously.","PeriodicalId":273582,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Theory Network","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing the Attitudes of Curriculum Developers toward Curriculum Evaluation and Research\",\"authors\":\"J. Rutherford\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1179155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From the vantage point of most curriculum project directors, evaluation is, apparently, something to be ignored. When these directors think about evaluation at all, the probability is that most of them regard it as an annoyance or worse. While some project directors seem to think that the whole business of evaluation is, if not fraudulent, at least unnecessary, others reluctantly accept it as a facet of dissemination strategy. Some project directors, of course, treat evaluation seriously.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Theory Network\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Theory Network\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1179155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Theory Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1179155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Changing the Attitudes of Curriculum Developers toward Curriculum Evaluation and Research
From the vantage point of most curriculum project directors, evaluation is, apparently, something to be ignored. When these directors think about evaluation at all, the probability is that most of them regard it as an annoyance or worse. While some project directors seem to think that the whole business of evaluation is, if not fraudulent, at least unnecessary, others reluctantly accept it as a facet of dissemination strategy. Some project directors, of course, treat evaluation seriously.