Java自动程序修复工具的反模式

Y. Wu
{"title":"Java自动程序修复工具的反模式","authors":"Y. Wu","doi":"10.1145/3324884.3418919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior study has identified common anti-patterns in automated repair for C programs. In this work, we study if the same problems exist in Java programs. We performed a manual inspection on the plausible patches generated by Java automated repair tools. We integrated anti-patterns in jGenProg2 and evaluated on Defects4J benchmark. The result shows that the average repair time is reduced by 22.6 % and the number of generated plausible patches is reduced from 67 to 29 for 14 bugs in total. Our study provided evidence about the effectiveness of applying anti-patterns in future Java automated repair tools.","PeriodicalId":106337,"journal":{"name":"2020 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-patterns for Java Automated Program Repair Tools\",\"authors\":\"Y. Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3324884.3418919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prior study has identified common anti-patterns in automated repair for C programs. In this work, we study if the same problems exist in Java programs. We performed a manual inspection on the plausible patches generated by Java automated repair tools. We integrated anti-patterns in jGenProg2 and evaluated on Defects4J benchmark. The result shows that the average repair time is reduced by 22.6 % and the number of generated plausible patches is reduced from 67 to 29 for 14 bugs in total. Our study provided evidence about the effectiveness of applying anti-patterns in future Java automated repair tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3324884.3418919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3324884.3418919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

先前的研究已经确定了C程序自动修复中的常见反模式。在这项工作中,我们研究了Java程序中是否存在同样的问题。我们对Java自动修复工具生成的貌似合理的补丁执行了手动检查。我们在jGenProg2中集成了反模式,并在缺陷4j基准上进行了评估。结果表明,平均修复时间减少了22.6%,生成的可信补丁数量从67个减少到29个,总共有14个bug。我们的研究为在未来的Java自动修复工具中应用反模式的有效性提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anti-patterns for Java Automated Program Repair Tools
Prior study has identified common anti-patterns in automated repair for C programs. In this work, we study if the same problems exist in Java programs. We performed a manual inspection on the plausible patches generated by Java automated repair tools. We integrated anti-patterns in jGenProg2 and evaluated on Defects4J benchmark. The result shows that the average repair time is reduced by 22.6 % and the number of generated plausible patches is reduced from 67 to 29 for 14 bugs in total. Our study provided evidence about the effectiveness of applying anti-patterns in future Java automated repair tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信