中风

{"title":"中风","authors":"","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.621334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defining MRI tissue signatures predicting favorable response to intravenous tissue plasminogen activator may allow for identifying patients amenable to treatment beyond the established time window. Krützelmann and colleagues analyzed data from 174 patients with acute ischemic stroke from a prospective multicenter observational study receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator treatment within 6 hours from symptom onset based on time window (0 to 3 hours) or MRI criteria (3 to 6 hours). Predictors of favorable outcome (receiver operating characteristic curve analysis-defined threshold) were a younger age ( 63 years), lower admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ( 13), and smaller diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume ( 16 mL). The authors found that there was no significant effect of onset to treatment time ( 3 hours versus 3 to 6 hours) following multivariate regression analysis. Conversely, mortality was predicted by age only. In line with prior studies, pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume appears associated with outcome; however, as the author’s caution, the defined diffusion-weighted imaging threshold should not be used for clinical decision-making for various reasons. For example, site and extent of arterial occlusion and recanalization rates are unknown. In addition, collateral status, comorbidities, and lesion location were not considered. Lastly, consistent with prior important large clinical trials, the author’s dichotomized outcome into favorable (modified Rankin Scale 1) versus unfavorable (modified Rankin Scale 2), yet, some may feel that categorizing modified Rankin Scale 2 as “unfavorable” might be too stringent. Additional valuable information might be provided by analysis modalities such as the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel shift test independent on prespecified binary outcomes. See p 1251.","PeriodicalId":110859,"journal":{"name":"Stroke A Journal of Cerebral Circulation","volume":"17 51","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stroke\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.621334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Defining MRI tissue signatures predicting favorable response to intravenous tissue plasminogen activator may allow for identifying patients amenable to treatment beyond the established time window. Krützelmann and colleagues analyzed data from 174 patients with acute ischemic stroke from a prospective multicenter observational study receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator treatment within 6 hours from symptom onset based on time window (0 to 3 hours) or MRI criteria (3 to 6 hours). Predictors of favorable outcome (receiver operating characteristic curve analysis-defined threshold) were a younger age ( 63 years), lower admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ( 13), and smaller diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume ( 16 mL). The authors found that there was no significant effect of onset to treatment time ( 3 hours versus 3 to 6 hours) following multivariate regression analysis. Conversely, mortality was predicted by age only. In line with prior studies, pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume appears associated with outcome; however, as the author’s caution, the defined diffusion-weighted imaging threshold should not be used for clinical decision-making for various reasons. For example, site and extent of arterial occlusion and recanalization rates are unknown. In addition, collateral status, comorbidities, and lesion location were not considered. Lastly, consistent with prior important large clinical trials, the author’s dichotomized outcome into favorable (modified Rankin Scale 1) versus unfavorable (modified Rankin Scale 2), yet, some may feel that categorizing modified Rankin Scale 2 as “unfavorable” might be too stringent. Additional valuable information might be provided by analysis modalities such as the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel shift test independent on prespecified binary outcomes. See p 1251.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke A Journal of Cerebral Circulation\",\"volume\":\"17 51\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke A Journal of Cerebral Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.621334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke A Journal of Cerebral Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.621334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定MRI组织特征,预测静脉注射组织纤溶酶原激活剂的有利反应,可能允许识别患者可在既定时间窗之外接受治疗。kr tzelmann及其同事分析了来自一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究的174例急性缺血性卒中患者的数据,根据时间窗(0 - 3小时)或MRI标准(3 - 6小时),在症状出现后6小时内接受静脉注射组织纤溶酶原激活剂治疗。预后良好的预测因子(受试者工作特征曲线分析定义阈值)为较年轻的年龄(63岁)、较低的入院美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(13)和较小的弥散加权成像病变体积(16 mL)。通过多变量回归分析,作者发现发病时间对治疗时间(3小时vs 3 - 6小时)没有显著影响。相反,死亡率只能通过年龄来预测。与先前的研究一致,预处理弥散加权成像病变体积似乎与预后相关;然而,作者提醒,由于各种原因,定义的弥散加权成像阈值不应用于临床决策。例如,动脉闭塞的部位和程度以及再通率都是未知的。此外,没有考虑侧枝状态、合并症和病变位置。最后,与之前重要的大型临床试验一致,作者将结果分为有利(修改的Rankin量表1)和不利(修改的Rankin量表2),然而,有些人可能会觉得将修改的Rankin量表2归类为“不利”可能过于严格。其他有价值的信息可能由分析模式提供,如Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel漂移检验,独立于预先指定的二元结果。见第1251页。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stroke
Defining MRI tissue signatures predicting favorable response to intravenous tissue plasminogen activator may allow for identifying patients amenable to treatment beyond the established time window. Krützelmann and colleagues analyzed data from 174 patients with acute ischemic stroke from a prospective multicenter observational study receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator treatment within 6 hours from symptom onset based on time window (0 to 3 hours) or MRI criteria (3 to 6 hours). Predictors of favorable outcome (receiver operating characteristic curve analysis-defined threshold) were a younger age ( 63 years), lower admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ( 13), and smaller diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume ( 16 mL). The authors found that there was no significant effect of onset to treatment time ( 3 hours versus 3 to 6 hours) following multivariate regression analysis. Conversely, mortality was predicted by age only. In line with prior studies, pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume appears associated with outcome; however, as the author’s caution, the defined diffusion-weighted imaging threshold should not be used for clinical decision-making for various reasons. For example, site and extent of arterial occlusion and recanalization rates are unknown. In addition, collateral status, comorbidities, and lesion location were not considered. Lastly, consistent with prior important large clinical trials, the author’s dichotomized outcome into favorable (modified Rankin Scale 1) versus unfavorable (modified Rankin Scale 2), yet, some may feel that categorizing modified Rankin Scale 2 as “unfavorable” might be too stringent. Additional valuable information might be provided by analysis modalities such as the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel shift test independent on prespecified binary outcomes. See p 1251.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信