{"title":"第二轨道外交及其对巴以奥斯陆和平进程的贡献","authors":"N. F.","doi":"10.33581/2521-6848-2022-1-19-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Track two diplomacy is designed to deal with conflicts that are deemed to be intractable, because the rational calculation \nof the antagonists leads to a zero-sum game. Track two diplomacy is non-official, it acts on the perceptions and beliefs and \nis expected to change the way each actor perceives their strategic interests and threats to their core values. We apply the \nconceptual frames derived from track two diplomacy theories to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict because it was a typical case \nof an intractable conflict transformed with track two diplomacy initiatives. Successful track two diplomacy initiatives were \ninitiated by a third party that socialised the antagonistic elites – i. e. US official and non-official actors, or think tanks. They \nwere combined with track one-and-a-half diplomacy, with an effect on the track one, i. e. the official diplomatic negotiations \non peace. Nevertheless, that did not lead to the in-depth transformation on the grassroots level advocated by peace and conflict resolution organisations.","PeriodicalId":299793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Belarusian State University. International relations","volume":"25 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE TRACK TWO DIPLOMACY AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE ISRAELI PALESTINIAN OSLO PEACE PROCESS\",\"authors\":\"N. F.\",\"doi\":\"10.33581/2521-6848-2022-1-19-30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Track two diplomacy is designed to deal with conflicts that are deemed to be intractable, because the rational calculation \\nof the antagonists leads to a zero-sum game. Track two diplomacy is non-official, it acts on the perceptions and beliefs and \\nis expected to change the way each actor perceives their strategic interests and threats to their core values. We apply the \\nconceptual frames derived from track two diplomacy theories to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict because it was a typical case \\nof an intractable conflict transformed with track two diplomacy initiatives. Successful track two diplomacy initiatives were \\ninitiated by a third party that socialised the antagonistic elites – i. e. US official and non-official actors, or think tanks. They \\nwere combined with track one-and-a-half diplomacy, with an effect on the track one, i. e. the official diplomatic negotiations \\non peace. Nevertheless, that did not lead to the in-depth transformation on the grassroots level advocated by peace and conflict resolution organisations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Belarusian State University. International relations\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Belarusian State University. International relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6848-2022-1-19-30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Belarusian State University. International relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6848-2022-1-19-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
THE TRACK TWO DIPLOMACY AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE ISRAELI PALESTINIAN OSLO PEACE PROCESS
Track two diplomacy is designed to deal with conflicts that are deemed to be intractable, because the rational calculation
of the antagonists leads to a zero-sum game. Track two diplomacy is non-official, it acts on the perceptions and beliefs and
is expected to change the way each actor perceives their strategic interests and threats to their core values. We apply the
conceptual frames derived from track two diplomacy theories to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict because it was a typical case
of an intractable conflict transformed with track two diplomacy initiatives. Successful track two diplomacy initiatives were
initiated by a third party that socialised the antagonistic elites – i. e. US official and non-official actors, or think tanks. They
were combined with track one-and-a-half diplomacy, with an effect on the track one, i. e. the official diplomatic negotiations
on peace. Nevertheless, that did not lead to the in-depth transformation on the grassroots level advocated by peace and conflict resolution organisations.